A Robust Approach to Quantifying Uncertainty in Matching Problems of Causal Inference

References

• Abadie A, Imbens GW (2006) Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica 74(1):235–267.Google Scholar
• Abadie A, Imbens GW (2011) Bias-corrected matching estimators for average treatment effects. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 29(1):1–11.Google Scholar
• Coker B, Rudin C, King G (2021) A theory of statistical inference for ensuring the robustness of scientific results. Management Sci. 67(10):6174–6197.Link, Google Scholar
• Diamond A, Sekhon JS (2013) Genetic matching for estimating causal effects: A general multivariate matching method for achieving balance in observational studies. Rev. Econom. Stat. 95(3):932–945.Google Scholar
• Fanaee-T H, Gama J (2014) Event labeling combining ensemble detectors and background knowledge. Progress Artificial Intelligence 2(2-3):113–127.Google Scholar
• Holland PW (1986) Statistics and causal inference. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 81(396):945–960.Google Scholar
• Hosmer D, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant R (2013) Applied Logistic Regression, 3rd ed. (John Wiley and Sons Inc., Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2011) Multivariate matching methods that are monotonic imbalance bounding. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 106(493):345–361.Google Scholar
• Iacus SM, King G, Porro G (2012) Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Polit. Anal. 20(1):1–24.Google Scholar
• Imai K, King G, Stuart EA (2008) Misunderstandings between experimentalists and observationalists about causal inference. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A 171(2):481–502.Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Rubin DB (2015) Causal Inference in Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Morgan SL, Winship C (2007) Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Morucci M, Rudin C (2020) Matching bounds: How choice of matching method affects treatment effect estimates and what to do about it. Preprint, submitted September 6, https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.02776.Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR (1984) Conditional permutation tests and the propensity score in observational studies. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 79(387):565–574.Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P (1989) Optimal matching for observational studies. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 84:1024–1032.Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P (2010) Evidence factors in observational studies. Biometrika 97(2):333–345.Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PR (2012) Optimal matching of an optimally chosen subset in observational studies. J. Comput. Graphical Statist. 21:57–71.Google Scholar
• Rubin DB (1974) Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J. Ed. Psych. 5(66):688–701.Google Scholar
• Rubin D (2007) The design vs. the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: Parallels with the design of randomized trials. Statist. Med. 26(1):20–36.Google Scholar
• Tamhane A, Dunlop D (2000) Statistics and Data Analysis (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Zubizarreta J (2012) Using mixed integer programming for matching in an observational study of kidney failure after surgery. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 107(500):1360–1371.Google Scholar