Help
Cart
Skip main navigation

Available Issues

July 20, 2022 - June 3, 2026

Available Issues

July 20, 2022 - June 3, 2026

Multiblock Parameter Calibration in Computer Models

Published Online:12 May 2023https://doi.org/10.1287/ijds.2023.0029

References

  • Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (1972) Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables (National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  • Bhattacharjee NV, Ranjan P, Mandal A, Tollner EW (2019) A history matching approach for calibrating hydrological models. Environment. Ecological Statist. 26(1):87–105.Google Scholar
  • Booth A, Choudhary R, Spiegelhalter D (2013) A hierarchical Bayesian framework for calibrating micro-level models with macro-level data. J. Building Performance Simulations 6(4):293–318.Google Scholar
  • Boyd SP, Vandenberghe L (2004) Convex Optimization (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Byon E, Choe Y, Yampikulsakul N (2016) Adaptive learning in time-variant processes with application to wind power systems. IEEE Trans. Automated Sci. Engrg. 13(2):997–1007.Google Scholar
  • Byon E, Shrivastava AK, Ding Y (2010) A classification procedure for highly imbalanced class sizes. IIE Trans. 42(4):288–303.Google Scholar
  • Chong A, Lam KP (2017) A comparison of MCMC algorithm for the Bayesian calibration of building energy models. Barnaby CS, Wetter M, eds. Proc. 15th IBPSA Building Simulation Conf. (International Building Performance Simulation Association, San Francisco), 1319–1328.Google Scholar
  • Chong A, Menberg K (2018) Guidelines for the Bayesian calibration of building energy models. Energy Buildings 174:527–547.Google Scholar
  • Chong A, Lam KP, Pozzi M, Yang J (2017) Bayesian calibration of building energy models with large datasets. Energy Buildings 154:343–355.Google Scholar
  • Coakley D, Raftery P, Keane M (2014) A review of methods to match building energy simulation models to measured data. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 37:123–141.Google Scholar
  • Duncan OJ, Tollner EW, Ssegane H (2013) An instantaneous unit hydrograph for estimating runoff from windrow composting pads. Appl. Engrg. Agriculture 29(2):209–223.Google Scholar
  • Frazier P (2018) A tutorial on Bayesian optimization. Preprint, submitted July 8, https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.02811.Google Scholar
  • Gramacy RB (2020) Surrogate: Gaussian Process Modeling, Design, and Optimization for the Applied Sciences (Chapman & Hall/CRC, London).Google Scholar
  • Gramacy RB, Bingham D, Holloway JP, Grosskoph MJ, Kuranz CC, Rutter E, Trantham M, et al. (2015) Calibrating a large computer experiment simulating radioactive shock hydrodynamics. Ann. Appl. Statist. 9:1141–1168.Google Scholar
  • Heo Y, Augenbroe G, Choudhary R (2013) Quantitative risk management for energy retrofit projects. J. Buildings Performance Simulations 6(4):257–268.Google Scholar
  • Heo Y, Choudhary R, Augenbroe G (2012) Calibration of building energy models for retrofit analysis under uncertainty. Energy Buildings 47:550–560.Google Scholar
  • Heo Y, Graziano DJ, Guzowski L, Muehleisen RT (2015) Evaluation of calibration efficacy under different levels of uncertainty. J. Buildings Performance Simulations 8(3):135–144.Google Scholar
  • Higdon D, Kennedy M, Cavendish JC, Cafeo JA, Ryne RD (2004) Combining field data and computer simulations for calibration and prediction. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 26(2):448–466.Google Scholar
  • Howland MF, Quesada JB, Martinez JJP, Larrañaga FP, Yadav Ne, Chawla JS, Sivaram V, et al. (2022) Collective wind farm operation based on a predictive model increases utility-scale energy production. Natural Energy. 7(9):818–827.Google Scholar
  • Jang Y, Byon E, Jahani E, Cetin K (2020) On the long-term density prediction of peak electricity load with demand side management in buildings. Energy Buildings 228:110450.Google Scholar
  • Jones DR, Schonlau M, Welch WJ (1998) Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. J. Global Optim. 13(4):455–492.Google Scholar
  • Kennedy MC, O’Hagan A (2001) Bayesian calibration of computer models. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Ser. B Statist. Methodology 63:425–464.Google Scholar
  • Kim YJ, Park CS (2016) Stepwise deterministic and stochastic calibration of an energy simulation model for an existing building. Energy Buildings 133:455–468.Google Scholar
  • Kristensen MH, Choudhary R, Petersen S (2017a) Bayesian calibration of building energy models: Comparison of predictive accuracy using metered utility data of different temporal resolution. Energy Proc. 122:277–282.Google Scholar
  • Kristensen MH, Choudhary R, Pedersen RH, Petersen S (2017b) Bayesian calibration of residential building clusters using a single geometric building representation. Proc. 15th IBPSA Building Simulation Conf., 1294–1303.Google Scholar
  • Li Q, Augenbroe G, Brown J (2016) Assessment of linear emulators in lightweight Bayesian calibration of dynamic building energy models for parameter estimation and performance prediction. Energy Buildings 124:194–202.Google Scholar
  • Li D, Menassa CC, Kamat VR, Byon E (2020) Heat-human embodied autonomous thermostat. Building Environment 178:106879.Google Scholar
  • Lim H, Zhai ZJ (2017) Comprehensive evaluation of the influence of meta-models on Bayesian calibration. Energy Buildings 155:66–75.Google Scholar
  • Liu H, Ong Y, Cai J (2018) A survey of adaptive sampling for global metamodeling in support of simulation-based complex engineering design. Structural Multidisciplinary Optim. 57(1):393–416.Google Scholar
  • Liu B, Yue X, Byon E, Kontar R (2021) Parameter calibration in wake effect simulation model with stochastic gradient descent and stratified sampling. Ann. Appl. Statist. 16(3):1795–1821.Google Scholar
  • Manfren M, Aste N, Moshksar R (2013) Calibration and uncertainty analysis for computer models: A meta-model based approach for integrated building energy simulation. Appl. Energy 103:627–641.Google Scholar
  • Menberg K, Heo Y, Choudhary R (2017) Efficiency and reliability of Bayesian calibration of energy supply system models. Proc. 15th IBPSA Building Simulation Conf.Google Scholar
  • Moré JJ, Wild SM (2012) Estimating derivatives of noisy simulations. ACM Trans. Math. Software 38(3):1–21.Google Scholar
  • Nocedal J, Wright J (2006) Numerical Optimization, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin).Google Scholar
  • Santner TJ, Williams BJ, Notz WI (2018) The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin).Google Scholar
  • Shahriari B, Swersky K, Wang Z, Adams RP, De Freitas N (2015) Taking the human out of the loop: A review of Bayesian optimization. Proc. IEEE 104(1):148–175.Google Scholar
  • Sokol J, Davila CC, Reinhart CF (2017) Validation of a Bayesian-based method for defining residential archetypes in urban building energy models. Energy Building 134:11–24.Google Scholar
  • Srinivas N, Krause A, Kakade S, Seeger M (2010) Gaussian process optimization in the bandit setting: No regret and experimental design. Proc. 27th Internat. Conf. on Machine Learn., 1015–1022.Google Scholar
  • Swersky K, Snoek J, Adams RP (2013) Multi-task Bayesian optimization. Burges CJ, Bottou L, Welling M, Ghahramani Z, Weinberger KQ, eds. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems vol. 26 (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY).Google Scholar
  • Tian W, Yang S, Li Z, Wei S, Pan W, Liu Y (2016) Identifying informative energy data in Bayesian calibration of building energy models. Energy Building 119:363–376.Google Scholar
  • Tuo R, Wu CJ (2015) Efficient calibration for imperfect computer models. Ann. Statist. 43:2331–2352.Google Scholar
  • Tuo R, Wu CJ (2016) A theoretical framework for calibration in computer models: Parametrization, estimation and convergence properties. SIAM/ASA J. Uncertainty Quantification 4(1):767–795.Google Scholar
  • Tuo R, He S, Pourhabib A, Ding Y, Huang JZ (2021) A reproducing kernel hilbert space approach to functional calibration of computer models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 1–15.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Energy (2019) Eneryplus essentials. Technical report, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Wahba G (1990) Spline Models for Observational Data (SIAM, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
  • Xu Z, Jeong C, Byon E, Cetin K (2021) Season-dependent parameter calibration in building energy simulation. Proc. IISE Annual Conf., 423–428.Google Scholar
  • You M, Byon E, Jin J, Lee G (2017) When wind travels through turbines: A new statistical approach for characterizing heterogeneous wake effects in multi-turbine wind farms. IISE Trans. 49(1):84–95.Google Scholar
  • You M, Liu B, Byon E, Huang S, Jin J (2018) Direction-dependent power curve modeling for multiple interacting wind turbines. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 33(2):1725–1733.Google Scholar
  • Zhang Y, Yang Q (2021) A survey on multi-task learning. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 34(12):5586–5609.Google Scholar
Previous
Back to Top
Next
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.
Agree