Generalized Networks: The Theory of Preprocessing and an Empirical Analysis

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1030.0031

References

  • Adler I., Karmarkar N., Resende M. G., Veiga G. Data structures and programming techniques for the implementation of Karmarkar’s algorithm. ORSA J. Comput. (1989) 1:84–106LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Andersen E. D., Andersen K. D. Presolving in linear programming. Math. Programming (1995) 71:221–245CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradley G. H., Brown G. G., Graves G. W., Karwan M. H., Lofti V., Telgen J., Zionts S. Structural redundancy in large-scale optimization models. Redundancy in Mathematical Programming (1983) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany) 145–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brearley A. L., Mitra G., Williams H. P. Analysis of mathematical programming problems prior to applying the simplex algorithm. Math. Programming (1975) 8:54–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown G. G., Olson M. P. Dynamic factorization in large-scale optimization. Math. Programming (1994) 64:17–51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown G. G., Thomen D. S. Automatic identification of generalized upper bounds in large-scale optimization models. Management Sci. (1980) 26:1166–1184LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Frangioni A., Gallo G. A bundle type dual-ascent approach to linear multicommodity min-cost flow problems. INFORMS J. Comput. (1999) 11:370–393LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gondzio J. Presolve analysis of linear programs prior to applying an interior point method. INFORMS J. Comput. (1997) 9:73–91LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gulpinar N., Gutin G., Mitra G., Maros I. Detecting embedded networks in LP using GUB structures and independent set algorithms. Comput. Optim. Appl. (2000) 15:235–247CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulpinar N., Mitra G., Maros I. Creating advanced bases for large scale linear programs exploiting embedded network structure. Comput. Optim. Appl. (2002) 21:71–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kennington J. L., Lewis K. R. Preprocessing techniques for generalized networks: Theory and an empirical analysis. (2000) . Technical Report 00-CSE-10, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TXGoogle Scholar
  • Klein D., Holm S. J. Some reduction of linear programs using bounds on problem variables. Redundancy in Mathematical Programming (1983) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany) 80–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis K.R. Preprocessing algorithms for generalized networks: Theory and an empirical analysis. (2001) . Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TXGoogle Scholar
  • Lustig I. J., Marsten R. E., Shanno D. F. Interior point methods for linear programming: Computational state of the art. ORSA J. Comput. (1994) 6:1–14LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McBride R. D. Advances in solving the multicommodity-flow problem. Interfaces (1998) 28:32–41LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McBride R. D., Mamer J. W. Solving multicommodity flow problems with a primal embedded network simplex algorithm. INFORMS J. Comput. (1997) 9:154–163LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tomlin J. A., Welch J. S. Finding duplicate rows in a linear programming model. Oper. Res. Lett. (1986) 5:7–11CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams H. P, Karwan M. H., Lofti V., Telgen J., Zionts S. A reduction procedure for linear and integer programming models. Redundancy in Mathematical Programming (1983) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany) 87–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.