A New Mathematical-Programming Framework for Facility-Layout Design

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1040.0103

References

  • Anjos M. F. New convex relaxations for the maximum cut and VLSI layout problems. (2001) . Ph.D. thesis, Department of Combinatorics and Optimization, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  • Anjos M. F., Vannelli A. An attractor-repeller approach to floorplanning. Math. Methods Oper. Res. (2002) 56:3–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anstreicher K., Brixius N., Goux J.-P., Linderoth J. Solving large quadratic assignment problems on computational grids. Math. Programming Ser. B (2002) 91:563–588CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Armour G., Buffa E. A heuristic algorithm and simulation approach to relative location of facilities. Management Sci. (1963) 9:294–309LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Balas E. Disjunctive programming: Properties of the convex hull of feasible points. Discrete Appl. Math. (1998) 89:3–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brooke A., Kendrick D., Meeraus A.GAMS—A User's Guide, Release 2.25 (1992) (The Scientific Press, South San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Ceria S., Soares J. Convex programming for disjunctive convex optimization. Math. Programming Ser. A (1999) 86:595–614CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drezner Z. DISCON: A new method for the layout problem. Oper. Res. (1980) 28:1375–1384LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ferris M. C., Pang J. S. Engineering and economic applications of complementarity problems. SIAM Rev. (1997) 39:669–713CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fletcher R., Leyffer S. Numerical experience with solving MPECs as NLPs. (2002) . Technical report NA\210, University of Dundee, Dundee, ScotlandGoogle Scholar
  • Foulds L.Graph Theory Applications (1991) (Springer Verlag, New York) Google Scholar
  • Huntley C., Brown D. A parallel heuristic for quadratic assignment problems. Comput. Oper. Res. (1991) 18:275–289CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luo Z.-Q., Pang J.-S., Ralph D.Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints (1996) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mavridou T., Pardalos P. Simulated annealing and genetic algorithms for the facility layout problem: A survey. Comput. Optim. Appl. (1997) 7:111–126CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meller R., Gau K.-Y. The facility layout problem: Recent and emerging trends and perspectives. J. Manufacturing Systems (1996) 15:351–366CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meller R., Narayanan V., Vance P. Optimal facility layout design. Oper. Res. Lett. (1998) 23:117–127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Montreuil B., White J., Pence I. A modelling framework for integrating layout design and flow network design. Progress in Material Handling and Logistics (1991) Vol. 2(Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany) 95–116CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murtagh B., Saunders M. Large-scale linearly constrained optimization. Math. Programming (1978) 14:41–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murtagh B., Saunders M. A projected Lagrangian algorithm and its implementation for sparse nonlinear constraints. Math. Programming Stud. (1982) 16:84–117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murtagh B., Saunders M. MINOS 5.1 User's Guide. (1987) . Technical Report SOL 83-20R, Department of Operations Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Nesterov Y., Nemirovskii A.Interior-Point Polynomial Algorithms in Convex Programming (1994) (SIAM, Philadelphia, PA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pardalos P., Wolkowicz H.Quadratic Assignment and Related Problems (1994) (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scriabin M., Vergin R. Comparison of computer algorithms and visual based methods for plant layout. Management Sci. (1975) 22:172–181LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sherali H., Fraticelli B., Meller R. Enhanced model formulations for optimal facility layout. Oper. Res. (2003) 51:629–644LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tate D., Smith A. Unequal-area facility layout by genetic search. IIE Trans. (1995) 27:465–472CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Camp D., Carter M., Vannelli A. A nonlinear optimization approach for solving facility layout problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1991) 57:174–189CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wright S.Primal-Dual Interior-Point Methods (1997) (SIAM, Philadelphia, PA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.