Tonal Description of Polyphonic Audio for Music Content Processing

References

• Bonada J. Automatic technique in frequency domain for near-lossless time-scale modification of audio. Internat. Comput. Music Conf., Berlin (2000) ICMA, San Francisco, CA:396–399Google Scholar
• Brown J. C., Puckette M. S. An efficient algorithm for the calculation of a constant Q transform. J. Acoustic Soc. America (1992) 92:2698–2701Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chew E. Towards a mathematical model of tonality. (2000) . Ph.D. thesis, Operations Research Center, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Dannenberg R. B. A brief survey of music representation issues, techniques and systems. Comput. Music J. (1993) 17:20–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• FreeDB (2004) . Free DB database, online publication, accessed February 2004. http://www.freedb.orgGoogle Scholar
• Fujishima T. Realtime chord recognition of musical sound: A system using common lisp music. Internat. Comput. Music Conf., Beijing, China (1999) ICMA, San Francisco, CA:464–467Google Scholar
• Goto M., Muraoka Y. Real-time beat tracking for drumless audio signals: Chord change detection for musical decisions. Speech Comm. (1999) 27:311–335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Janata P., Birk J. L., Van Horn J. D., Leman M., Tillmann B., Bharucha J. J. The cortical topography of tonal structures underlying western music science. Science (2002) 298:2167–2170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klapuri A. Signal processing methods for the automatic transcription of music. (2003) . Ph.D. thesis, Signal Processing Laboratory, Tampere Institute of Technology, Tampere, FinlandGoogle Scholar
• Krumhansl C. L.Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch (1990) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Leman M., Meij J. Musical audio mining. Dealing with the Data Flood Symposium, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (2002) (STT Netherlands Study Centre for Technology Trends, Rotterdam, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
• Leman M., Clarisse L. P., De Baets B., De Meyer H., Lesaffre M., Martens G., Martens J. P., Van Steelant D., Manzano A. Calvo, López A. Pérez, Santiago J. Salvador. Tendencies, perspectives, and opportunities of musical audio-mining. Forum Acusticum, Session SS-MUS-01 (2002) (Seville, Spain). http://www.ia.csic.es/sea/4375cd.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Purwins H., Blankertz B., Obermayer K., Amari S. I., Giles C. L., Gori M., Piuri V. A new method for tracking modulations in tonal music in audio data format. Neural Networks-IJCNN (2000) Vol. 6(IEEE Computer Society, New York) 270–275Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purwins H., Graepel T., Blankertz B., Obermayer K., Puebla E. L., Mazzola G., Noll T. Correspondence analysis for visualizing interplay of pitch class, key, and composer. Perspectives in Mathematical Music Theory (2003) (Verlag epOs-Music, Osnabruck, Germany) 432–454Google Scholar
• Sadie S., Tyrrell J., Kernfeld B.Grove Music Online: The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians (2004) 2nd ed.The New Grove Dictionary of Opera and The New Grove Dictionary of Jazz, 2nd ed. http://www.grovemusic.comGoogle Scholar
• Serra X., Poli G. D., Picialli A., Pope S. T., Roads C. Musical sound modeling with sinusoids plus noise. Musical Signal Processing (1996) (Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, The Netherlands) 91–122Google Scholar
• Sheh A., Ellis D., Hoos H. H., Bainbridge D. Chord segmentation and recognition using EM-trained hidden Markov models. Proc. 4th Internat. Sympos. Music Inform. Retrieval (2003) Baltimore, MD:183–189 http://www.ismir.netGoogle Scholar
• Temperley D. What’s key for key? The Krumhansl-Schmuckler key finding algorithm reconsidered. Music Perception (1999) 17:65–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tzanetakis G., Fingerhut M. Pitch histograms in audio and symbolic music information retrieval. Internat. Sympos. Music Inform. Retrieval (2002) Paris, France:31–38 http://www.ismir.netGoogle Scholar