Recurrent Neural Networks for Music Computation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1050.0131

References

  • Allen P., Dannenberg R. Tracking musical beats in real time. Internat. Comput. Music Conf. (1990) International Computer Music Association, San Francisco, CA:140–143Google Scholar
  • Berg S.Jazz Improvisation: The Goal-Note Method (1990) 2nd ed.(Kendor Music, Inc., Delevan, NY) Google Scholar
  • Campolucci P. A circuit theory approach to recurrent neural network architectures and learning methods. (1998) . Ph.D. thesis, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica, Universitá Degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  • Dannenberg R., Thom B., Watson D. A machine learning approach to musical style recognition. Proc. Internat. Comput. Music Conf. (1997) ICMA, San Francisco, CA:344–347Google Scholar
  • Desain P., Honing H., de Rijk K. A connectionist quantizer. Proc. 1989 Internat. Comput. Music Conf. (1989) ICMA, San Francisco, CA:80–85Google Scholar
  • Eck D., Schmidhuber J. Learning the long-term structure of the blues. Proc. 2002 Internat. Conf. Artificial Neural Networks (ICANN) (2002) 284–289CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Franklin J. A. Multi-phase learning for jazz improvisation and interaction. Proc. Eighth Biennial Connecticut College Sympos. Arts and Tech. (2000) Connecticut College, New London, CT:51–60Google Scholar
  • Franklin J. A., Dietterich T. G., Becker S., Ghahramani Z. Learning and improvisation. Neural Information Processing Systems 14 (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 1377–1384Google Scholar
  • Franklin J. A. Recurrent neural networks and pitch representations for music tasks. Proc. 2004 Florida AI Research Sympos. (FLAIRS04) Special Track on AI and Music (2004a) AAAI Press, Cambridge, MA:33–37Google Scholar
  • Franklin J. A. Predicting reinforcement of pitch sequences via LSTM and TD. Proc. 2004 Internat. Comput. Music Conf. (2004b) ICMA, San Francisco, CA:130–136Google Scholar
  • Gers F. A., Schmidhuber J., Cummins F. Learning to forget: Continual prediction with LSTM. Neural Comput. (2000) 12(10):2451–2471CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffith N., Todd P.Musical Networks: Parallel Distributed Perception and Performance (1999) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hochreiter S., Bengio Y., Frasconi P., Schmidhuber J. Gradient flow in recurrent nets: The difficulty of learning long-term dependencies. A Field Guide to Dynamical Recurrent Networks (2001) (IEEE Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hochreiter S., Schmidhuber J. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. (1997) 9(8):1735–1780CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jordan M. Attractor dynamics and parallelism in a connectionist sequential machine. Proc. Eighth Annual Conf. Cognitive Sci. Soc. (1986) Amherst, MA:531–546Google Scholar
  • Kolen J. F., Kremer S. C.A Field Guide to Dynamical Recurrent Networks (2001) (IEEE Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Laden B., Keefe D. H., Todd P. M., Loy E. D. The representation of pitch in a neural net model of chord classification. Music and Connectionism (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Large E. W., Kolen J. F. Resonance and the perception of musical meter. Connection Sci. (1994) 6(2 & 3):177–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mandic D. P., Chambers J. A.Recurrent Neural Networks for Prediction (2001) (Wiley, West Sussex, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Messick P.Maximum MIDI (1988) (Manning Publications, Greenwich, CT) Google Scholar
  • Mozer M. C. Neural network music composition by prediction: Exploring the benefits of psychophysical constraints and multiscale processing. Connection Sci. (1994) 6:247–280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • PG Music Band-in-a-Box. . http://www.pgmusic.com/bandbox.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Rumelhart D., Hinton G., Williams R., Rumelhart D. E., McClelland J. L. Learning internal representations by error propagation. Parallel Distributed Processing 1 (1986) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 318–362Google Scholar
  • Sabatella M.A Whole Approach to Jazz Improvisation (1996) (ADG Productions, Lawndale, CA) Google Scholar
  • Shepard R. N. Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science (1987) 237:1317–1323CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steedman M. The well-tempered computer. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Ser. A (1994) 149:115–131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson T. Keykit programming language and graphical environment for MIDI. (2003) . http://nosuch.com/tjt/Google Scholar
  • Todd P. M., Todd P. M., Loy E. D. A connectionist approach to algorithmic composition. Music and Connectionism (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Todd P. M., Loy E. D.Music and Connectionism (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams R. J., Peng J. An efficient gradient-based algorithm for on-line training of recurrent network trajectories. Neural Comput. (1990) 2(4):490–501CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams R. J., Zipser D. A learning algorithm for continually running fully recurrent networks. (1988) . Technical Report ICS-8805, Institute for Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.