Methodologies for Evaluation of Note-Based Music-Retrieval Systems

References

• Barlow H., Morganstern S.A Dictionary of Musical Themes (1948) (Crown, New York) Google Scholar
• Beeferman Doug. QPD: Query by pitch dynamics indexing tonal music by content. (1997) . Unpublished report, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
• Blackburn S., DeRoure D. A tool for content-based navigation of music. Proc. ACM Internat. Multimedia Conf. (1998) (ACM, New York) 361–368Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blair D. C. STAIRS redux: Thoughts on the STAIRS evaluation, ten years after. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. (1996) 47:4–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borchers J., Muhlhauser M. Design patterns for interactive musical systems. IEEE Multimedia (1998) 5:36–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buckley C., Voorhees E. M., Järvelin K., Allan J., Bruza P. Retrieval evaluation with incomplete information. Proc. ACM-SIGIR Internat. Conf. Res. Development in Inform. Retrieval (2004) (ACM, New York) 25–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen B. Query by singing. (1998) . Master’s thesis, Department of Computer Science, National Tsing Hua University, TaiwanGoogle Scholar
• Chen J. C. C., Chen A. L. P. Query by rhythm: An approach for song retrieval in music databases. Proc. IEEE Internat. Workshop Res. Issues in Data Engrg. (1998) (IEEE, New York) 139–146Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chou T.-C., Chen A. L. P., Liu C.-C. Music databases: Indexing techniques and implementation. Proc. IEEE Internat. Workshop in Multimedia DBMS (1996) (IEEE, New York) 46–53Google Scholar
• Crane F., Fiehler J., Lincoln H. B. Numerical methods of comparing musical styles. The Computer and Music (1970) (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY) 209–222Chap. 15Google Scholar
• Dannenberg R., Birmingham W., Tzanetakis G., Meek C., Hu N., Pardo B., Hoos H. H., Bainbridge D. The MUSART testbed for query-by-humming evaluation. Internat. Conf. Music Inform. Retrieval (2003) Vol. 4(Baltimore, MD)41–47Google Scholar
• Dovey M. J. Heuristic models of relevance ranking in searching polyphonic music. Diderot Mathematical Forum: Conf. Comput. Math. Methods in Music (1999) (European Mathematical Society, Vienna, Austria) 111–113Google Scholar
• Dowling W. J. Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies. Psych. Rev. (1978) 85:341–354Crossref, Google Scholar
• Downie J. S., Toms E. Informetrics and music information retrieval: An informetric examination of a folksong database. Proc. Canadian Assoc. Inform. Sci., 1998 Annual Conf. (1998) CAIS, Canadian Association for Information Science, Toronto, Canada:375–392Google Scholar
• Francès R.La Perception de la Musique (1958) (L. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) . Translated by W. J. Dowling, 1988Google Scholar
• Ghias A., Logan J., Chamberlin D., Smith B., Zellweger P. Query by humming—Musical information retrieval in an audio database. Proc. ACM Internat. Multimedia Conf. (1995) (ACM, New York) 231–236Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halperin D. Musical chronology by seriation. Comput. Humanities (1994) 28:13–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hudson B., Lincoln H. B. Toward a comprehensive French chanson catalog. The Computer and Music (1970) (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY) 277–287Chap. 17Google Scholar
• Kageyama T., Mochizuki K., Takashima Y. Melody retrieval with humming. Proc. Internat. Comput. Music Conf. (1993) ICMA, San Francisco, CA:349–351Google Scholar
• Kassler M., Lincoln H. B. MIR: A simple programming language for musical information retrieval. The Computer and Music (1970) (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY) 299–327Chap. 20Google Scholar
• Knopoff L., Hutchinson W. Entropy as a measure of style: The influence of sample length. J. Music Theory (1983) 27:75–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kosugi N., Nishihara Y., Kon’ya S., Yamamuro M., Kushima K. Music retrieval by humming—Using similarity retrieval over high dimensional feature vector space. Proc. IEEE Pacific Rim Conf. Comm., Comput. Signal Processing (1999) (IEEE, New York) 404–407Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lemström K., Tarhio J., Mariani J., Harman D. Detecting monophonic patterns within polyphonic sources. Proc. Conf. Content-Based Multimedia Inform. Access, RIAO (2000) Vol. 6CID, Paris, France:1261–1279Google Scholar
• Lindsay A. T. Using contour as a mid-level representation of melody. (1996) . Master’s thesis, MIT Media Laboratory, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Logrippo L., Stepien B. Cluster analysis for the computer-assisted statistical analysis of melodies. Comput. Humanities (1986) 20:19–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• McNab R. J., Smith L. A., Bainbridge D., Witten I. H. The New Zealand Digital Library MELody inDEX. D-Lib. Magazine (1997) 3(5Crossref, Google Scholar
• McNab R. J., Smith L. A., Witten I. H., Henderson C. L., Cunningham S. J. Towards the digital music library: Tune retrieval from acoustic input. Proc. ACM Digital Libraries (1996) (ACM, New York) 11–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melucci M., Orio N. The use of melodic segmentation for content-based retrieval of musical data. Proc. Internat. Comput. Music Conf. (1999) International Computer Music Association, San Francisco, CA:120–123Google Scholar
• Mongeau M., Sankoff D. Comparison of musical sequences. Comput. Humanities (1990) 24:161–175Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ó’Maídin D. A geometrical algorithm for melodic difference. Comput. Musicology (1998) 11:65–72Google Scholar
• Parsons D.The Directory of Tunes (1975) (Spencer Brown, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Rolland P., Raskinis G., Ganascia J. Musical content-based retrieval: An overview of the Melodiscov approach. Proc. ACM Internat. Multimedia Conf. (1999) ACM, New York:81–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schaffrath H., Marsden A., Pople A. The retrieval of monophonic melodies and their variants: Concepts and strategies for computer-aided analysis. Computer Representations and Models in Music (1992) (Academic Press, London, UK) 95–110Google Scholar
• Shifrin J., Birmingham W., Hoos H. H., Bainbridge D. Effectiveness of HMM-based retrieval on large databases. Internat. Conf. on Music Inform. Retrieval (2003) Vol. 4Baltimore, MD:33–39Google Scholar
• Stinson J. The scribe database. Comput. Musicology (1992) 8:65Google Scholar
• Tseng Y-H. Content-based retrieval for music collections. Proc. ACM-SIGIR Internat. Conf. Res. Development in Inform. Retrieval (1999) ACM SIGIR(ACM Press, New York) 176–182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uitdenbogerd A. L., Yap Y. W., Hoos H. H., Bainbridge D. Was Parsons right? An experiment in usability of music representations for melody-based music retrieval. Internat. Conf. Music Inform. Retrieval (2003) Baltimore, MD:75–79Google Scholar
• Uitdenbogerd A. L., Zobel J., Bulterman D., Jeffay K., Zhang H. J. Melodic matching techniques for large music databases. Proc. ACM Internat. Multimedia Conf. (1999) ACM(ACM Press, New York) 57–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uitdenbogerd A. L., Zobel J., Oudshoorn M. Music ranking techniques evaluated. Proc. Australasian Comput. Sci. Conf. (2002) Australian Computer Society, Sydney, Australia:275–283Google Scholar
• Wang A., Hoos H. H., Bainbridge D. An industrial-strength audio search algorithm. Internat. Conf. Music Inform. Retrieval (2003) Vol. 4Baltimore, MD:7–13Google Scholar
• Witten I. H., Moffat A., Bell T. C.Managing Gigabytes: Compressing and Indexing Documents and Images (1999) 2nd ed.(Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Zobel J., Wilkinson R., Croft B., van Rijsbergen K., Moffat A., Zobel J. How reliable are the results of large-scale information retrieval experiments? Proc. ACM-SIGIR Internat. Conf. Res. Development in Inform. Retrieval (1998) (ACM Press, New York) 307–314Crossref, Google Scholar