Enhancing Lagrangian Dual Optimization for Linear Programs by Obviating Nondifferentiability

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1050.0158

References

  • Adams W. P., Sherali H. D. Mixed-integer bilinear-programming problems. Math. Programming (1993) 59:279–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barahona F., Anbil R. The volume algorithm: Producing primal solutions with a subgradient method. Math. Programming (2000) 87:385–399CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bazaraa M. S., Jarvis J. J., Sherali H. D.Linear Programming and Network Flows (2005) 3rd ed.(Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bazaraa M. S., Sherali H. D., Shetty C. M.Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms (2006) 3rd ed.(Wiley, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerini P. M., Fratta L., Maffioli F. On improving relaxation methods by modified gradient techniques. Math. Programming Stud. (1975) 3:26–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher M. L. The Lagrangian relaxation method for solving integer programming problems. Management Sci. (1981) 27:1–18LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fletcher R., Reeves C. M. Function minimization by conjugate gradients. Comput. J. (1964) 7:149–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Held M., Wolfe P., Crowder H. Validation of subgradient optimization. Math. Programming (1974) 6:62–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hestenes M. R., Stiefel E. Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems. J. Res. National Bureau Standards, Section B (1952) 48:409–436CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larsson T., Patriksson M., Stromberg A. B. Ergodic, primal convergence in dual subgradient schemes for convex programming. Math. Programming (1999) 86:283–312CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lemarechal C., Lemarechal C., Mifflin R. Bundle methods in nonsmooth optimization. Proc. IIASA Workshop, Laxenburg, Austria (1977) 3:79–109Google Scholar
  • Lim C. Nondifferentiable optimization of Lagrangian dual formulations for linear programs with recovery of primal solutions. (2004) . Ph.D. dissertation, Grado Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VAGoogle Scholar
  • Lim C., Sherali H. D. Convergence and computational analyses for some variable target value and subgradient deflection methods. Comput. Optim. Appl. (2006) 34:409–428CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Makela M. M. Survey of bundle methods for nonsmooth optimization. Optim. Methods Software (2002) 17:1–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mifflin R. An algorithm for constrained optimization with semismooth functions. Math. Oper. Res. (1977) 2:191–207LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nesterov Y. Smooth minimization of non-smooth functions. Math. Programming (2005) 103:127–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polak E., Ribiere G. Note on the convergence of methods of conjugate directions. Rev. Française d’Informatique Recherche Operationelle (1969) 3:35–43Google Scholar
  • Polyak B. T. A general method of solving extremum problems. Soviet Math. (1967) 8:593–597Google Scholar
  • Polyak B. T. Minimization of unsmooth functionals. USSR Comput. Math. Math. Phys. (1969) 9:14–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell M. J. D. Restart procedures for the conjugate gradient method. Math. Programming (1977) 12:241–254CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shanno D. F. Conjugate gradient methods with inexact searches. Math. Oper. Res. (1978) 3:244–256LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sherali H. D., Choi G. Recovery of primal solutions when using subgradient optimization methods to solve Lagrangian duals of linear programs. Oper. Res. Lett. (1996) 19:105–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherali H. D., Myers D. C. Dual formulations and subgradient optimization strategies for linear programming relaxations of mixed-integer programs. Discrete Appl. Math. (1988) 20:51–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherali H. D., Tuncbilek C. H. New reformulation linearization/convexification relaxations for univariate and multivariate polynomial programming problems. Oper. Res. Lett. (1997) 21:1–9CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherali H. D., Ulular O. A primal-dual conjugate subgradient algorithm for specially structured linear and convex programming problems. Appl. Math. Optim. (1989) 20:193–221CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherali H. D., Ulular O. Conjugate gradient methods using quasi-Newton updates with inexact line searches. J. Math. Anal. Appl. (1990) 150:359–377CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherali H. D., Choi G., Ansari Z. Limited memory space dilation and reduction algorithms. Comput. Optim. Appl. (2001) 19:55–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherali H. D., Choi G., Tuncbilek C. H. A variable target value method for nondifferentiable optimization. Oper. Res. Lett. (2000) 26:1–8CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shor N. Z. Utilization of the operation of space dilatation in the minimization of convex functions. Kibernetika (1970a) 6:6–12Google Scholar
  • Shor N. Z. Convergence rate of the gradient descent method with dilatation of the space. Kibernetika (1970b) 6:80–85Google Scholar
  • Shor N. Z.Minimization Methods for Non-Differentiable Functions (1985) (Springer-Verlag, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.