An Optimization Framework for Conformal Radiation Treatment Planning

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1060.0179

References

  • Bahr G. K., Kereiakes J. G., Horwitz H., Finney R., Galvin J., Goode K. The method of linear programming applied to radiation treatment planning. Radiology (1968) 91:686–693CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bortfeld Th., Schlegel W. Optimization of beam orientations in radiation therapy: Some theoretical considerations. Phys. Medicine Biol. (1993) 38:291–304CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bortfeld Th. R., Burkelbach J., Boesecke R., Schlegel W. Methods of image reconstruction from projections applied to conformation radiotherapy. Phys. Medicine Biol. (1990) 25:1423–1434CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bortfeld Th. R., Boyer A. L., Schlegel W., Kahler D. L., Waldron T. J. Realization and verification of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with modulated fields. Internat. J. Radiation Oncology, Biol. Phys. (1994) 30:899–908CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brooke A., Kendrick D., Meeraus A.GAMS: A User’s Guide (1988) (The Scientific Press, South San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Chen G. T. Y., Spelbring D. R., Pelizzari C. A., Balter J. M., Myrianthopoulous L. C., Vijayakumar S., Halpern H. The use of beam eye view volumetrics in the selection of noncoplanar radiation portals. Internat. J. Radiation Oncology: Biol., Phys. (1992) 23:153–163CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y., Michalski D., Houser C., Galvin J. M. A deterministic iterative least-squares algorithm for beam weight optimization in conformal radiotherapy. Phys. Medicine Biol. (2002) 47:1647–1658CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cho B. C. J., Roa W. H., Robinson D., Murray B. The development of target-eye-view maps for selection of coplanar or noncoplanar beams in conformal radiotherapy treatment planning. Medical Phys. (1999) 26:2367–2372CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cormack A., Quinto E. The mathematics and physics of radiation dose planning using X-rays. Contemporary Math. (1990) 113:41–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crooks S. M., Pugachev A., King C., Xing L. Examination of the effect of increasing the number of radiation beams on a radiation treatment plan. Phys. Medicine Biol. (2002) 47:3485–3501CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dai J., Zhu Y., Ji Q. Optimizing beam weights and wedge filters with the concept of the super-omni wedge. Medical Phys. (2000) 27:2757–2762CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dennis J., Das I. A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems. Structural Optim. (1997) 14:63–69CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Earl M. A., Shepard D. M., Naqvi S., Li X. A., Yu C. Inverse planning for intensity modulated arc therapy using direct aperture optimization. Phys. Medicine Biol. (2003) 48:1075–1089CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ehrgott M., Burjony M. Radiation therapy planning by multicriteria optimization. Proc. 36th Annual Conf. Oper. Res. Soc. (2001) New Zealand:244–253Google Scholar
  • Ehrgott M., Johnston R. Optimisation of beam directions in intensity modulated radiation therapy planning. OR Spectrum (2003) 25:251–264CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferris M. C., Lim J.-H., Shepard D. M. Optimization approaches for treatment planning on a Gamma Knife. SIAM J. Optim. (2003a) 13:921–937CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferris M. C., Lim J.-H., Shepard D. M. Radiosurgery treatment planning via nonlinear programming. Ann. Oper. Res. (2003b) 119:247–260CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferris M. C., Meyer R. R., D’Souza W., Williams H. P., Appa G., Pitsoulis L. Radiation treatment planning: Mixed integer programming formulations and approaches. Handbook on Modelling for Discrete Optimization (2005) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Ferris M. C., Einarsson R., Jiang Z., Shepard D. Sampling issues for optimization in radiotherapy. (2004) . Technical Report, Comput. Sci. Dept., University of Wisconsin, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  • Goitein M., Abrams M., Rowell S., Pollari H., Wiles J. Multi-dimensional treatment planning: II. Beam’s eye-view, back projection, and projection through ct sections. Internat. J. Radiation Oncology, Biol., Phys. (1983) 9:789–797CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gokhale P., Hussein E. M. A., Kulkarni N. Determination of beam orientation in radiotherapy planning. Medical Phys. (1994) 21:393–400CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamacher H. W., Küfer K.-H. Inverse radiation therapy planning—A multiple objective optimization approach. Discrete Appl. Math. (2002) 118:145–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hass O. C. L., Burnham K. J., Mills J. A. Optimization of beam orientation in radiotherapy using planar geometry. Phys. Medicine Biol. (1998) 43:2179–2193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holder A. Partitioning multiple objective optimal solutions with applications in radiotherapy design. (2001) . Math. Technical Report 54, Trinity University, San Antonio, TXGoogle Scholar
  • Holder A. Designing radiotherapy plans with elastic constraints and interior point methods. Health Care and Management Sci. (2003) 6:5–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holder A., Brandeau M. L., Sainfort F., Pierskalla W. P. Radiotherapy treatment design and linear programming. Oper. Res. and Health Care: A Handbook of Methods and Applications (2004) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) 741–774Google Scholar
  • Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Collaborative Working Group Intensity-modulated radiotherapy: Current status and issues of interest. Internat. J. Radiation Oncology: Biol., Phys. (2001) 51:880–914CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jordan T. J., Williams P. C. The design and performance characteristics of a multileaf collimator. Phys. Medicine Biol. (1994) 39:231–251CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langer M., Brown R., Urie M., Leong J., Stracher M., Shapiro J. Large scale optimization of beam weights under dose-volume restrictions. Internat. J. Radiation Oncology, Biol. Phys. (1990) 18:887–893CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee E. K., Fox T., Crocker I. Optimization of radiosurgery treatment planning via mixed integer programming. Medical Phys. (2000) 27:995–1004CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee E. K., Fox T., Crocker I. Integer programming applied to intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning. Ann. Oper. Res. (2003) 119:165–181CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Legras J., Legras B., Lambert J. Software for linear and non-linear optimization in external radiotherapy. Comput. Programs Biomedicine (1982) 15:233–242CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leong J., Langer M. Optimization of beam weights under dose-volume restrictions. Internat. J. Radiation Oncology, Biol. Phys. (1987) 13:1255–1260CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li J. G., Boyer A. L., Xing L. Clinical implementation of wedge filter optimization in three-dimensional radiotherapy treatment planning. Radiotherapy and Oncology (1999) 53:257–264CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lodwick W., McCourt S., Newman F., Humphries S., Borgers C., Natterer F. Optimization methods for radiation therapy plans. Computational Radiology and Imaging: Therapy and Diagnosis (1999) (Springer-Verlag)229–250IMA Series in Appl. Math.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morrill S., Rosen I., Lane R., Belli J. The influence of dose constraint point placement on optimized radiation therapy treatment planning. Internat. J. Radiation Oncology, Biol. Phys. (1990) 19:129–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Myrianthopoulos L. C., Chen G. T. Y., Vijayakumar S., Halpern H., Spelbring D. R., Pelizzari C. A. Beams eye view volumetrics—An aid in rapid treatment plan development and evaluation. Internat. J. Radiation Oncology: Biol., Phys. (1992) 23:367–375CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nemhauser G. L., Wolsey L. A.Integer and Combinatorial Optimization (1988) (Wiley, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Preciado-Walters F., Rardin R., Langer M., Thai V. A coupled column generation, mixed-integer approach to optimal planning of intensity modulated radiation therapy for cancer. Math. Programming (2004) 101:319–338CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pugachev A., Xing L. Pseudo beam’s-eye-view as applied to beam orientation selection in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Internat. J. Radiation Oncology, Biol., Phys. (2001) 51:1361–1370CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pugachev A., Xing L. Incorporating prior knowledge into beam orientation optimization in IMRT. Internat. J. Radiation Oncology, Biol. Phys. (2002) 54:1565–1574CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosen I., Lane R., Morrill S., Belli J. Treatment plan optimization using linear programming. Medical Phys. (1990) 18:141–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rowbottom C. G., Khoo V. S., Webb S. Simultaneous optimization of beam orientations and beam weights in conformal radiotherapy. Medical Phys. (2001) 28:1696–1702CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rowbottom C. G., Webb S., Oldham M. Improvements in prostate radiotherapy from the customization of beam directions. Medical Phys. (1998) 25:1171–1179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rowbottom C. G., Webb S., Oldham M. Beam-orientation customization using an artificial neural network. Phys. Medicine Biol. (1999) 44:2251–2262CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shalev S., Viggars D., Carey M., Hahn P. The objective evaluation of alternative treatment plans 2 score functions. Internat. J. Radiation Oncology: Biol., Phys. (1991) 20:1067–1073CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shepard D. M., Earl M. A., Li X. A., Yu C. Direct aperture optimization: A turnkey solution for step-and-shoot IMRT. Medical Phys. (2002) 29:1007–1018CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shepard D. M., Ferris M. C., Olivera G., Mackie T. R. Optimizing the delivery of radiation to cancer patients. SIAM Rev. (1999) 41:721–744CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherouse G. W. A mathematical basis for selection of wedge angle and orientation. Medical Phys. (1993) 20:1211–1218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soderstrom S., Gustafsson A., Brahme A. Few-field radiation-therapy optimization in the phase-space of complication-free tumor central. Internat. J. Imaging Systems Tech. (1995) 6:91–103CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sonderman D., Abrahamson P. Radiotherapy treatment design using mathematical programming models. Oper. Res. (1985) 33:705–725LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tervo J., Kolmonen P. A model for the control of a multileaf collimator in radiation therapy treatment planning. Inverse Problems (2000) 16:1875–1895CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Webb S. Optimisation of conformal radiotherapy dose distributions by simulated annealing. Phys. Medicine Biol. (1989) 34:1349–1370CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Webb S. Optimization by simulated annealing of three-dimensional, conformal treatment planning for radiation fields defined by a multileaf collimator. Phys. Medicine Biol. (1991) 36:1201–1226CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Webb S. Optimization by simulated annealing of three-dimensional, conformal treatment planning for radiation fields defined by a multileaf collimator: II. Inclusion of the two-dimensional modulation of the x-ray intensity. Phys. Medicine Biol. (1992) 37:1689–1704CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Webb S.The Physics of Conformal Radiotherapy: Advances in Technology (1997) (Institute of Physics Publishing Ltd., Bristol, England) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Webb S. Configuration options for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using multiple static fields shaped by a multileaf collimator. Phys. Medicine Biol. (1998) 43:241–260CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu X., Zhu Y. A global optimization method for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys. Medicine Biol. (2001) 46:109–119CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xiao Y., Censor Y., Michalski D., Galvin J. M. The least-intensity feasible solution for aperture-based inverse planning in radiation therapy. Ann. Oper. Res. (2003) 119:183–203CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xing L., Hamilton R. J., Pelizzari C. A., Chen G. T. Y. A three-dimensional algorithm for optimizing beam weights and wedge filters. Medical Phys. (1998) 25:1858–1865CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xing L., Pelizzari C. A., Kuchnir F. T., Chen G. T. Y. Optimization of relative weights and wedge angles in treatment planning. Medical Phys. (1997) 24:215–221CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.