Multi-Issue Automated Negotiations Using Agents

References

• Bazerman M. H., Neale M. A. Improving negotiation effectiveness under final offer arbitration: The role of selection and training. J. Appl. Psych. (1982) 67:543–548Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chavez A., Maes P. Kasbah: An agent marketplace for buying and selling goods. Proc. First Internat. Conf. Practical Appl. Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Tech. (1996) (Practical Application, London, UK) 75–90Google Scholar
• Chicago Board of TradeCommodity Trading Manual (1998) (Chicago Board of Trade, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Deveaux L., Paraschiv C., Latourrette M. Bargaining on an Internet-based market: Behavioral vs. optimizing agents. Electronic Commerce Res. (2001) 1:371–401Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faratin P., Sierra C., Jennings N. R. Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. Robotics and Autonomous Systems (1998) 24:159–182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fatima S. S., Wooldridge M., Jennings N. R. An agenda-based framework for multi-issue negotiation. Artificial Intelligence (2004) 152:1–45Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fatima S. S., Wooldridge M., Jennings N. R. On efficient procedures for multi-issue negotiation. Proc. Internat. Workshop Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce (2006) Hakodate, Japan:71–85Google Scholar
• Kahneman D. Reference points, anchors, norms and mixed feelings. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1992) 51:296–312Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kambil A., Heck E. V. Reengineering the Dutch flower auctions: A framework for analyzing exchange organizations. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9:1–19Link, Google Scholar
• Kersten G. E., Noronha S. WWW-based negotiation support: Design, implementation and use. Dec. Support Systems (1999) 25:135–154Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraus S., Wilkenfeld J. A strategic negotiation model with applications to an international crisis. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics (1993) 23:313–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kristensen H., Garling T. Anchor points, reference points and counteroffers in negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiation (2000) 9:493–505Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lange D., Oshima M.Programming and Deploying Java Mobile Agents with Aglets (1998) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Luo X., Jennings N. R., Shadbolt N., Leung H., Lee J. H. A fuzzy constraint-based model for bilateral, multi-issue negotiations in semi-competitive environment. Artificial Intelligence (2003) 148:53–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mumpower J. L. The judgment policies of negotiators and the structure of negotiation problems. Management Sci. (1991) 37:1304–1324Link, Google Scholar
• Oliver J. R. A machine learning approach to automated negotiation and prospects for electronic commerce. J. Management Inform. Systems (1996) 13:126–164Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paurobally S., Turner P. J., Jennings N. R. Automating negotiation for m-services. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part A (2003) 33:709–724Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raiffa H.Art and Science of Negotiation (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Rangaswamy A., Shell G. R. Using computers to realize joint gains in negotiations: Toward an “electronic bargaining table. Management Sci. (1997) 43:1147–1163Link, Google Scholar
• Rietz T. A. Implementing and testing risk-preference-induction mechanisms in experimental sealed-bid auctions. J. Risk and Uncertainty (1993) 7:199–213Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon H. A.Models of Man (1957) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Smith V. L. Experimental economics: Induced value theory. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1976) 66:274–279Google Scholar
• Sycara K. Negotiation planning: An AI approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1990) 46:216–234Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahnemann D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (1974) 185:1124–1131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeng D., Sycara K. Bayesian learning in negotiation. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. (1998) 48:125–141Crossref, Google Scholar