Risk Minimization and Minimum Description for Linear Discriminant Functions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1070.0248

References

  • Bajgier S. M., Hill A. V. An experimental comparison of statistical and linear programming approaches to the discriminant problem. Decision Sci. (1982) 13:604–618CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Belfiore N. P., Esposito A. Theoretical and experimental study of crossover operators of genetic algorithms. J. Optim. Theory Appl. (1998) 99(2):271–302CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradley P. S., Mangasarian O. L., Shavlik J. W. Feature selection via concave minimization and support vector machines. Proc. 15th Internat. Conf. Machine Learning (1998) Madison, WI(Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco) 82–90Google Scholar
  • Bradley P. S., Mangasarian O. L., Street W. N. Feature selection via mathematical programming. INFORMS J. Comput. (1998) 10:209–217LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chang C. C., Lin C. J. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. (2001) . http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/∼cjlin/papers/libsvm.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Cooley W. W., Lohnes P. R.Multivariate Data Analysis (1971) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Cristianini N., Shawe-Taylor J.An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-Based Learning Methods (2000) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher R. A. The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann. Eugenics (1936) 7:179–188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freed N., Glover F. A linear programming approach to the discriminant problem. Decision Sci. (1981) 12:68–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freed N., Glover F. Linear programming and statistical discrimination—The LP side. Decision Sci. (1982) 13:172–175CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fung G., Mangasarian O. L. A feature selection Newton method for support vector machine classification. Computational Optim. Appl. (2004) 28(2):185–202CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glover F. Improved linear and integer programming models for discriminant analysis. (1988) . Centre for Applied Artificial Intelligence (CAAI) Report 88-1 February, University of Colorado, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  • Goldberg D. E.Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization & Machine Learning (1989) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Goldberg D. E.The Design of Innovation: Lessons from and for Competent Genetic Algorithms (2002) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guyon I., Weston J., Barnhill S., Vapnik V. Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Machine Learning (2002) 46(1–3):389–422CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hand D. J.Discrimination and Classification (1981) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • ILOG Inc. CPLEX Division. (2003) . ILOG CPLEX 8 User's Manual, Incline Village, NVGoogle Scholar
  • Keerthi S. S., Shevade S. K., Bhattacharyya C., Murthy K. R. K. Improvements to Platt's SMO algorithm for SVM classifier design. Neural Comput. (2001) 13:637–649CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koehler G. J. Characterization of unacceptable solutions in LP discriminant analysis. Decision Sci. (1989) 20(2):239–257CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koehler G. J. Discriminant functions determined by genetic search. INFORMS J. Comput. (1991) 3(4):345–357LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Koehler G. J., Erenguc S. S. Minimizing misclassifications in linear discriminant analysis. Decision Sci. (1990) 21(1):63–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lim T. S., Loh W. Y., Shih Y. S. A comparison of prediction accuracy, complexity, and training time of thirty-three old and new classification algorithms. Machine Learning (2000) 40(3):203–228CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mangasarian O. L. Misclassification minimization. J. Global Optim. (1994) 5(4):309–323CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mangasarian O. L., Fischer H., Riedmueller B., Schaeffler S. Machine learning via polyhedral concave minimization. Applied Mathematics and Parallel Computing—Festschrift for Klaus Ritter (1995) (Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany) 175–188Google Scholar
  • Mangasarian O. L., Wolberg W. H. Machine learning for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. . ftp://ftp.cs.wisc.edu/math-prog/cpo-dataset/machine-learn/cancer/Google Scholar
  • Markowski E. P., Markowski C. A. Some difficulties and improvements in applying linear programming formulations to the discriminant problem. Decision Sci. (1985) 16:237–247CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Michie D., Spiegelhalter D. J., Taylor C. C.Machine Learning, Neural and Statistical Classification (1994) (Horwood, New York) Google Scholar
  • Mitchell M.An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms (Complex Adaptive Systems) (1996) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Platt J. Sequential minimal optimization: A fast algorithm for training support vector machines. (1998) . Microsoft Research Technical Report MSR-TR-98-14, Redmond, WAGoogle Scholar
  • Rissanen J. Modeling by shortest data description. Automatica (1978) 14:465–471CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothlauf F.Representation for Genetic and Evolutionary Algorithms (2006) (Physica-Verlag, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schölkopf B., Smola A. J.Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization and Beyond (2001) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Schölkopf B., Burges C., Vapnik V., Fayyad U. M., Uthurusamy R. Extracting support data for a given task. Proc. First Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (1995) Montreal(AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA) 252–257Google Scholar
  • Stam A., Joachimsthaler E. A. Solving the classification problem in discriminant analysis via linear and nonlinear programming methods. Decision Sci. (1989) 20:285–293CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stam A., Joachimsthaler E. A. A comparison of a robust mixed-integer approach to existing methods for establishing classification rules for the discriminant problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1990) 46:113–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vapnik V.Statistical Learning Theory (1998) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wallace C. S., Boulton D. M. An information measure for classification. Comput. J. (1969) 11:185–195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whitley D., Rowe J., Wright A. Gray, binary and real valued encodings: Quad search and locality proofs. Foundations of Genetic Algorithm Theory 2005 (2005) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) 21–36LNCS 3469CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.