A Lifted Linear Programming Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for Mixed-Integer Conic Quadratic Programs

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1070.0256

References

  • Abhishek K., Leyffer S., Linderoth J. T. Filmint: An outer-approximation-based solver for nonlinear mixed integer programs. (2006) . Preprint ANL/MCS-P1374-0906, Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Akturk M. S., Atamturk A., Gurel S. A strong conic quadratic reformulation for machine-job assignment with controllable processing times. Optimization Online (2007) . http://www.optimization-online.org/DB_HTML/2007/06/1698.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Ball K. M., Levy S. An elementary introduction to modern convex geometry. Flavors of Geometry, Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications (1997) 31(Cambridge University Press, New York) 1–58Google Scholar
  • Ben-Tal A., Nemirovski A. Robust solutions of uncertain linear programs. Oper. Res. Lett. (1999) 25:1–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Tal A., Nemirovski A.Lectures on Modern Convex Optimization: Analysis, Algorithms, and Engineering Applications (2001a) (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Tal A., Nemirovski A. On polyhedral approximations of the second-order cone. Math. Oper. Res. (2001b) 26:193–205LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsimas D., Shioda R. An algorithm for cardinality constrained quadratic optimization problems. (2004) . Working paper, MIT, Cambridge, MA, http://web.mit.edu/dbertsim/www/papers.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Bienstock D. Computational study of a family of mixed-integer quadratic programming problems. Math. Programming (1996) 74:121–140CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bonami P., Waechter A., Biegler L. T., Conn A. R., Cornuejols G., Grossmann I. E., Laird C. D., Lee J., Lodi A., Margot F., Sawaya N. An algorithmic framework for convex mixed integer nonlinear programs. (2005) . IBM Research Report RC23771, IBM, Yorktown Heights, NYGoogle Scholar
  • Borchers B., Mitchell J. E. An improved branch and bound algorithm for mixed integer nonlinear programs. Comput. Oper. Res. (1994) 21:359–367CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ceria S., Stubbs R. A. Incorporating estimation errors into portfolio selection: Robust portfolio construction. J. Asset Management (2006) 7:109–127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chang T.-J., Meade N., Beasley J. E., Sharaiha Y. M. Heuristics for cardinality constrained portfolio optimisation. Comput. Oper. Res. (2000) 27:1271–1302CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dolan E. D., Moré J. J. Benchmarking optimization software with performance profiles. Math. Programming (2002) 91:201–213CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duran M. A., Grossmann I. E. An outer-approximation algorithm for a class of mixed-integer nonlinear programs. Math. Programming (1986) 36:307–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fletcher R., Leyffer S. Solving mixed integer nonlinear programs by outer approximation. Math. Programming (1994) 66:327–349CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geoffrion A. Generalized Benders decomposition. J. Optim. Theory Appl. (1972) 10:237–260CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glineur F. Computational experiments with a linear approximation of second order cone optimization. (2000) . Image Technical Report 0001, Service de Mathématique et de Recherche Opérationnelle, Faculté Polytechnique de Mons, Mons, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  • Grossmann I. E. Review of nonlinear mixed-integer and disjunctive programming techniques. Optim. Engrg. (2002) 3:227–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta O. K., Ravindran A. Branch and bound experiments in convex nonlinear integer programming. Management Sci. (1985) 31:1533–1546LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Horst R., Pardalos P. M., Thoai N. V.Introduction to Global Optimization, Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications (1995) 3(Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • ILOGCplex 10: User's Manual and Reference Manual (2005) (ILOG, Mountain View, CA) Google Scholar
  • Leyffer S. Integrating SQP and branch-and-bound for mixed integer nonlinear programming. Comput. Optim. Appl. (2001) 18:295–309CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lobo M. S., Fazel M., Boyd S. Portfolio optimization with linear and fixed transaction costs. Ann. Oper. Res. (2007) 152:341–365CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lobo M. S., Vandenberghe L., Boyd S. Application of second-order cone programming. Linear Algebra Appl. (1998) 284:193–228CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maringer D., Kellerer H. Optimization of cardinality constrained portfolios with a hybrid local search algorithm. OR Spectrum (2003) 25:481–495CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quesada I., Grossmann I. E. An LP/NLP based branch and bound algorithm for convex MINLP optimization problems. Comput. Chem. Engrg. (1992) 16:937–947CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stubbs R. A., Mehrotra S. A branch-and-cut method for 0-1 mixed convex programming. Math. Programming (1999) 86:515–532CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tawarmalani M., Sahinidis N. V. Global optimization of mixed-integer nonlinear programs: A theoretical and computational study. Math. Programming (2004) 99:563–591CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westerlund T., Pettersson F. An extended cutting plane method for solving convex MINLP problems. Comput. Chem. Engrg. (1995) 19:S131–S136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westerlund T., Pettersson F., Grossmann I. E. Optimization of pump configurations as a MINLP problem. Comput. Chem. Engrg. (1994) 18:845–858CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.