Reactive Tabu Search in a Team-Learning Problem

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1070.0259

References

  • Baker K., Magazine M., Polak G. Optimal block design models for cohorts timetabling. Oper. Res. Lett. (2002) 30:1–8CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker K., Magazine M., Polak G., Shen Y., Duenyas I., Zhang R. Cohort timetabling. Proc. MSOM Conf. (2000) Ann Arbor, MI(University of Michigan, Ann Arbor) Google Scholar
  • Bardadym V., Carter M., Ross P. Computer aided school and university timetabling: The new wave. Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling (1996) 1153(Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg) 22–45Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science SeriesCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Battiti R., Tecchiolli G. The reactive tabu search. ORSA J. Comput. (1994) 6:126–140LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burke E., Petrovic S. Recent research directions in automated timetabling. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2002) 140:266–280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burke E., Kingston J., de Werra D., Gross J., Yellen J. Application to timetabling. Handbook of Graph Theory (2004) (Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL) 445–474Google Scholar
  • Burke E., Jackson K., Kingston J., Weare R. Automated timetabling: The state of the art. Comput. J. (1997) 40:565–571CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carter M. A survey of practical applications of examination timetabling algorithms. Oper. Res. (1986) 34:193–202LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carter M., Laporte G., Burke E., Ross P. Recent developments in practical exam timetabling. Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling (1996) 1153(Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg) 3–21Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science SeriesCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carter M., Laporte G., Burke E., Carter M. Recent developments in practical course timetabling. Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling (1998) 1408(Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg) 3–19Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science SeriesCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cela E.The Quadratic Assignment Problem (1998) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chaovalitwongse W., Pardalos P., Iasemidis L., Shiau D., Sackellares J. Dynamic approaches and multi-quadratic integer programming for seizure prediction. Optim. Methods Software (2005) 20:383–394CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chiang W., Russell R. A reactive tabu search metaheuristic for the vehicle routing problem with time windows. INFORMS J. Comput. (1997) 9:417–430LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chiang W., Kouvelis P., Urban T. Improving workflow interference in facility design: The quartic assignment problem. Management Sci. (2002) 48:584–590LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Darby-Dowman K., Little J. Properties of some combinatorial optimization problems and their effect on the performance of integer programming and constraint logic programming. INFORMS J. Comput. (1998) 10:276–286LinkGoogle Scholar
  • de Werra D. An introduction to timetabling. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1985) 19:151–162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dey A.Theory of Block Designs (1986) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dongarra J. Performance of various computers using standard linear equations software. (2006) . Technical Report CS-89-85. University of Tennessee, KnoxvilleGoogle Scholar
  • Fourer R. “Balanced” assignment. (1997) . Reprinted from Compass News, Fall 1997, no. 5. http://www.ampl.com/CASES/balassign.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Glover F. Future paths for integer programming and links to artificial intelligence. Comput. Oper. Res. (1986) 5:533–549CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glover F., Laguna M.Tabu Search (1997) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glover F., Kochenberger G., Alidaee B. Adaptive memory tabu search for binary quadratic programs. Management Sci. (1998) 44:337–345LinkGoogle Scholar
  • John J.Cyclic Designs (1987) (Chapman and Hall, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson K., Johnson J.School Timetabling (1989) (Hutchinson Ltd., London) Google Scholar
  • Kirkwood C. Selecting student project teams when it really matters: An optimization-based approach using Internet resources. INFORMS Trans. Ed. (2004) 4:9–27LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Landa Silva J., Burke E., Petrovic S., Gandibleux X., Sevaux M., Sorensen K., T'kindt V. An introduction to multiobjective metaheuristics for scheduling and timetabling. Metaheuristic for Multiobjective Optimization. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (2004) 535(Springer, Berlin) 91–129Google Scholar
  • Lawler E. The quadratic assignment problem. Management Sci. (1963) 9:586–599LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marriott K., Stuckey P.Programming with Constraints (1998) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petrovic S., Burke E., Leung J. University timetabling. Handbook of Scheduling: Algorithms, Models, and Performance Analysis (2004) (Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL) 45-1–45-23Chapter 45Google Scholar
  • Schaerf A. A survey of automated timetabling. Artificial Intelligence Rev. (1999) 13:87–127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Skorin-Kapov J. Tabu search applied to the quadratic assignment problem. ORSA J. Comput. (1990) 2:33–45LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Timmers K. Learning together better: The structured design of learning teams. (2004) . Master's thesis, Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  • Van Hentenryck P.The Optimization Programming Language (1999) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Wren A., Burke E., Ross P. Scheduling, timetabling and rostering—A special relationship? Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling. Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series (1996) 1153(Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg) 46–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.