Solving Beam-Angle Selection and Dose Optimization Simultaneously via High-Throughput Computing

References

• Aleman D. M., Romeijn H. E., Dempsey J. F. A response surface-based approach to beam orientation optimization in IMRT treatment planning. IIE Annual Conf. Exposition (2006) May 20–24Orlando, FL(Institute of Industrial Engineers, Norcross, GA) 6–11Google Scholar
• Bortfeld T. IMRT: A review and preview. Phys. Med. Biol. (2006) 51(13):R363–R379Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cotrutz C., Lahanas M., Kappas K., Baltas D. A multiobjective gradient-based dose optimization algorithm for external beam conformal radiotherapy. Phys. Med. Biol. (2001) 46:2161–2175Crossref, Google Scholar
• Djajaputra D., Wu Q., Wu Y., Mohan R. Algorithm and performance of a clinical IMRT beam-angle optimization system. Phys. Med. Biol. (2003) 48(19):3191–3212Crossref, Google Scholar
• D'Souza W. D., Meyer R. R., Shi L. Selection of beam orientations in intensity-modulated radiation therapy using single-beam indices and integer programming. Phys. Med. Biol. (2004) 49(15):3465–3481Crossref, Google Scholar
• D'Souza W. D., Zhang H. H., Nazareth D. P., Shi L., Meyer R. R. A nested partitions framework for beam angle optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Phys. Med. Biol. (2008) 53(12):3293–3307Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehrgott M., Johnston R. Optimisation of beam directions in intenstiy modulated radiation therapy planning. OR Spectrum (2003) 25(2):251–264Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehrgott M., Holder A., Reese J. Beam selection in radiotherapy design. (2005) . Report, http://ramanujan.math.trinity.edu/tumath/research/reports/report95.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Engel K., Tabbert E. Fast simultaneous angle, wedge, and beam intensity optimization in inverse radiotherapy planning. Optim. Engrg. (2005) 6(4):393–419Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferris M. C., Meyer R. R., D'Souza W. Radiation treatment planning: Mixed integer programming formulations and approaches. (2002) . Optimization Technical Report 02–08, Computer Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin–Madison, MadisonGoogle Scholar
• Gunawardena A., Meyer R. R. Discrete approximations to real-valued leaf sequencing problems in radiation therapy. Discrete Appl. Math. (2008) 156(17):3178–3186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holder A., Salter B., Greenberg H. A tutorial on radiation oncology and optimization. Tutorials on Emerging Methodologies and Applications in Operations Research (2004) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) . Chapter 4Google Scholar
• Lahanas M., Schreibmann E., Baltas D. Multiobjective inverse planning for intensity modulated radiotherapy with constraint-free gradient-based optimization algorithms. Phys. Med. Biol. (2003) 48(17):2843–2871Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langer M., Thai V., Papiez L. Improved leaf sequencing reduces segments or monitor units needed to deliver IMRT using multileaf collimators. Med. Phys. (2001) 28(12):2450–2458Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee E. K., Fox T., Crocker I. Optimization of radiosurgery treatment planning via mixed integer programming. Med. Phys. (2000) 27(5):995–1004Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee E. K., Fox T., Crocker I. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Internat. J. Radiation Oncol. Biol. Phys. (2006) 64(1):301–320Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim G. J., Choi J., Mohan R. Iterative solution methods for beam angle and fluence map optimization in intensity modulated radiation therapy planning. OR Spectrum (2007) 30(2):289–309Crossref, Google Scholar
• Llacer J. Inverse radiation treatment planning using the dynamically penalized likelihood method. Med. Phys. (1997) 24(11):1751–1764Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu H. M., Kooy H. M., Leber Z. H., Ledoux R. J. Optimized beam planning for linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery. Internat. J. Radiation Oncol. Biol. Phys. (1997) 39(5):1183–1189Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCormick T., Dink D., Orcun S., Pekny J., Rardin R., Baxter L., Thai V., Langer M. Target volume uncertainty and a method to visualize its effect on the target dose prescription. Internat. J. Radiation Oncol. Biol. Phys. (2004) 60(5):1580–1588Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meedt G., Alber M., Nüsslin F. Non-coplanar beam direction optimization for intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Phys. Med. Biol. (2003) 48(18):2999–3019Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer R. R., Zhang H. H., Goadrich L., Nazareth D. P., Shi L., D'Souza W. D. A multiplan treatment-planning framework: A paradigm shift for intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Internat. J. Radiation Oncol. Biol. Phys. (2007) 68(4):1178–1189Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ólafsson A., Wright S. J. Linear programming formulations and algorithms for radiotherapy treatment planning. Optim. Methods Software (2006) 21(2):201–231Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ólafsson A., Jeraj R., Wright S. J. Optimization of intensity-modulated radiation therapy with biological objectives. Phys. Med. Biol. (2005) 50(22):5357–5379Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pi L., Pan Y., Shi L. Hybrid nested partitions and mathematical programming approach and its applications. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Engrg. (2008) 5(4):573–586Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preciado-Walters F., Rardin R., Langer M., Thai V. A coupled column generation, mixed integer approach to optimal planning of intensity modulated radiation therapy for cancer. Math. Programming (2004) 101(2):319–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pugachev A., Xing L. Pseudo beam's-eye-view as applied to beam orientation selection in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Internat. J. Radiation Oncol. Biol. Phys. (2001) 51(5):1361–1370Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pugachev A., Xing L. Incorporating prior knowledge into beam orientation optimization in IMRT. Internat. J. Radiation Oncol. Biol. Phys. (2002) 54(5):1565–1574Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pugachev A. B., Boyer A. L., Xing L. Beam orientation optimization in intensity-modulated radiation treatment planning. Med. Phys. (2000) 27(6):1238–1245Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reid P. P., Compton W. D., Grossman J. H., Fanjiang G.Building a Better Delivery System: A New Engineering/Health Care Partnership (2005) (National Academies Press, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Romeijn H. E., Ahuja R. K., Dempsey J. F., Kumar A. A column generation approach to radiation therapy treatment planning using aperture modulation. SIAM J. Optim. (2005) 15(3):838–862Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romeijn H. E., Ahuja R. K., Dempsey J. F., Kumar A. A new linear programming approach to radiation therapy treatment planning problems. Oper. Res. (2006) 54(2):201–216Link, Google Scholar
• Rosen I. I., Lane R. G., Morrill S. M., Belli J. A. Treatment plan optimization using linear programming. Med. Phys. (1991) 18(2):141–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rowbottom C. G., Webb S., Oldham M. Beam-orientation customization using an artificial neural network. Phys. Med. Biol. (1999) 44(9):2251–2262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schreibmann E., Lahanas M., Xing L., Baltas D. Multi-objective evolutionary optimization of the number of beams, their orientations and weights for intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Phys. Med. Biol. (2004) 49(5):747–770Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shepard D. M., Earl M. A., Li X. A., Naqvi S., Yu C. Direct aperture optimization: A turnkey solution for step-and-shoot IMRT. Med. Phys. (2002) 29(6):1007–1018Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi L., Men S. Optimal buffer allocation in production lines. IIE Trans. (2003) 35:1–10Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi L., Ólafsson S. Convergence rate of the nested partitions method for stochastic optimization. Methodology Comput. Appl. Probab. (2000a) 2:37–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi L., Ólafsson S. Nested partitions method for global optimization. Oper. Res. (2000b) 48(3):390–407Link, Google Scholar
• Shi L., Ólafsson S., Chen Q. An optimization framework for product design. Management Sci. (2001) 47(12):1681–1692Link, Google Scholar
• Shi L., Ólafsson S., Sun N. Parallel randomized algorithm for the traveling salesman problem. Comput. Oper. Res. (1999) 26(4):371–394Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi L., Pi L., Chen W. Nested partitions and its applications to the intermodal hub location problem. Computational Optimization and Logistics Challenges in the Enterprise (2009) (Springer, New York) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Shu H. Z., Yan Y. L., Bao X. D., Fu Y., Luo L. M. Treatment planning optimization by quasi-Newton and simulated annealing methods for gamma unit treatment system. Phys. Med. Biol. (1998) 43(10):2795–2805Crossref, Google Scholar
• Söderström S., Brahme A. Which is the most suitable number of photon beam portals in coplanar radiation therapy? Internat. J. Radiation Oncol. Biol. Phys. (1995) 33(1):151–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu Q., Mohan R. Multiple local minima in IMRT optimization based on dose-volume criteria. Med. Phys. (2002) 29(7):1514–1527Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu X., Zhu Y. A maximum-entropy method for the planning of conformal radiotherapy. Med. Phys. (2001a) 28(11):2241–2246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu X., Zhu Y. An optimization method for importance factors and beam weights based on genetic algorithms for radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys. Med. Biol. (2001b) 46(4):1085–1099Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xing L., Li J. G., Pugachev A., Le Q. T., Boyer A. L. Estimation theory and model parameter selection for therapeutic treatment plan optimization. Med. Phys. (1999) 26(11):2348–2358Crossref, Google Scholar