Synthetic Optimization Problem Generation: Show Us the Correlations!
Published Online:29 Jun 2009https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1090.0330
References
- A rigorous computational comparison of alternative solution methods for the generalized assignment problem. Management Sci. (1994) 40(7):868–890Link, Google Scholar
- Pivot and complement—A heuristic for 0–1 programming. Management Sci. (1980) 26(1):86–96Link, Google Scholar
- An algorithm for large zero-one knapsack problems. Oper. Res. (1980) 28(5):1130–1154Link, Google Scholar
- An approximate dynamic programming approach to multidimensional knapsack problems. Management Sci. (2002) 48(4):550–565Link, Google Scholar
- Modeling and generating random vectors with arbitrary marginal distributions and correlation matrix. (1997) . Technical report, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
- , Uszoy R., Schmeiser B. Alternative methods for generating synthetic generalized assignment problems. Proc. 4th Indust. Engrg. Res. Conf. (1995) (Institute of Industrial Engineers, Norcross, GA) 1080–1089Google Scholar
- An investigation of the relationship between problem characteristics and algorithm performance: A case study of the GAP. IIE Trans. (2002) 34(March):297–312Crossref, Google Scholar
- A multiplier adjustment method for the generalized assignment problem. Management Sci. (1986) 32(9):1095–1103Link, Google Scholar
- An efficient preprocessing procedure for the multidimensional 0–1 knapsack problem. Discrete Appl. Math. (1994) 49(1–3):189–212Crossref, Google Scholar
- The 0–1 bidimensional knapsack problem: Toward an efficient high-level primitive tool. J. Heuristics (1996) 2(2):147–167Crossref, Google Scholar
- An improved dual based algorithm for the generalized assignment problem. Oper. Res. (1989) 37(4):658–663Link, Google Scholar
- Generating experimental data for computational testing with machine scheduling applications. Oper. Res. (2001) 49(6):854–865Link, Google Scholar
- Multivariate composite distributions for coefficients in synthetic optimization problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2000a) 121(1):64–77Crossref, Google Scholar
- The effects of coefficient correlation in two-dimensional knapsack problems on solution procedure performance. Management Sci. (2000b) 46(2):302–317Link, Google Scholar
- Needed: An empirical science of algorithms. Oper. Res. (1994) 42(2):201–212Link, Google Scholar
- A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables. Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput. (1982) 11(3):311–334Crossref, Google Scholar
- Tradeoff solutions in single machine production scheduling for minimizing flow time and maximum penalty. Comput. Oper. Res. (1989) 16(5):471–479Crossref, Google Scholar
- New greedy heuristics for the multi-dimensional 0–1 knapsack problem. Oper. Res. (1979) 27(6):1101–1114Link, Google Scholar
- , Mingozzi A., Sandi C. The 0–1 knapsack problem. Combinatorial Optimization (1979) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) 237–279Google Scholar
- , Brans J. An algorithm for the generalized assignment problem. Proc. 9th IFORS Conf. (1981) (North Holland, Amsterdam) 589–603Google Scholar
- Algorithms for knapsack problems. Ann. Discrete Math. (1987) 31:213–258Google Scholar
- A new algorithm for the 0–1 knapsack problem. Management Sci. (1988) 34(5):633–644Link, Google Scholar
- Upper bounds and algorithms for hard 0–1 knapsack problems. Oper. Res. (1997) 45(5):768–778Link, Google Scholar
- Dynamic programming and strong bounds for the 0–1 knapsack problem. Management Sci. (1999) 45(3):414–424Link, Google Scholar
- New trends in exact algorithms for the 0–1 knapsack problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2000) 123(2):325–332Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Balci O., Sadowski R. P., Nance R. E. Characterizing distributions of discrete bivariate random variables for simulation and evaluation of solution methods. Proc. 22nd Conf. Winter Simulation (1990) New Orleans(IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) 294–302Crossref, Google Scholar
- A minimal algorithm for the 0–1 knapsack problem. Oper. Res. (1997) 45(5):758–767Link, Google Scholar
- Algorithms for scheduling a single machine to minimize the weighted number of late jobs. Management Sci. (1988) 34(7):843–858Link, Google Scholar
- , Nelson B. L., Kelton W. D., Clark G. M. Optimization problems with uniformly distributed coefficients. Proc. 23rd Conf. Winter Simulation (1991) Phoenix(IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) 866–874Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Evans G. W., Mollaghasemi M., Russell E. C., Biles W. E. A comparison of alternative input models for synthetic optimization problems. Proc. 25th Conf. Winter Simulation (1993) Los Angeles(IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) 356–364Crossref, Google Scholar
- Generating coefficients for optimization test problems with implicit correlation induction. Proc. 1997 IEEE-SMC Conf. (1997) Orlando, FL(IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA) 2438–2443Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Farrington P. A., Nembhard H. B., Sturrock D. T., Evans G. W. Input models for synthetic optimization problems. Proc. 31st Conf. Winter Simulation: Simulation—A Bridge to the Future (1999) 1(ACM, New York) 116–121Crossref, Google Scholar
- Experiments with parallel branch-and-bound algorithms for the set covering problem. Oper. Res. Lett. (1993) 13(5):277–285Crossref, Google Scholar
- A linear relaxation heuristic for the generalized assignment problem. Naval Res. Logist. (1992) 39(2):137–151Crossref, Google Scholar
- A computational study on 0–1 knapsack problems generated under explicit correlation induction. (1994) . Unpublished master's dissertation, Ohio State University, ColumbusGoogle Scholar

