Improving Bounds on the Football Pool Problem by Integer Programming and High-Throughput Computing

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1090.0334

References

  • Anstreicher K., Brixius N., Goux J.-P., Linderoth J. T. Solving large quadratic assignment problems on computational grids. Math. Programming Ser. B (2002) 91(3):563–588CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Applegate D. L., Bixby R. E., Chvátal V., Cook W. J.The Trav- eling Salesman Problem (2006) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Barnhart C., Johnson E. L., Nemhauser G. L., Savelsbergh M. W. P., Vance P. H. Branch-and-price: Column generation for solving huge integer programs. Oper. Res. (1998) 46(3):316–329LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bazaraa M. S., Kirca O. A branch-and-bound-based heuristic for solving the quadratic assignment problem. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. (1983) 30(2):287–304CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradley D. Schedd on the side. (2006) Presentation, Condor Week 2006April 25(University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison) Google Scholar
  • Butler G., Lam C. W. H. A general backtrack algorithm for the isomorphism problem of combinatorial objects. J. Symbolic Comput. (1985) 1(4):363–381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Q., Ferris M. C., Linderoth J. T. FATCOP 2.0: Advanced features in an opportunistic mixed integer programming solver. Ann. Oper. Res. (2001) 103:17–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epema D. H. J., Livny M., van Dantzig R., Evers X., Pruyne J. A worldwide flock of Condors: Load sharing among workstation clusters. J. Future Generation Comput. Systems (1996) 12(1):53–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foster I., Kesselman C. Globus: A metacomputing infrastructure toolkit. Internat. J. Supercomputer Appl. (1997) 11(2):115–128CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foster I., Kesselman C., Foster I., Kesselman C. Computational grids. The Grid: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure (1999) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco) 15–52Chapter 2Google Scholar
  • Frey J., Tannenbaum T., Livny M., Foster I., Tuecke S. Condor-G: A computation management agent for multi-institutional grids. Cluster Comput. (2002) 5(3):237–246CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glankwamdee W., Linderoth J., Talbi E. MW: A software framework for combinatorial optimization on computational grids. Parallel Combinatorial Optimization (2006) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) 239–261CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goux J.-P., Leyffer S. Solving large MINLPs on computational grids. Optim. Engrg. (2003) 3(3):327–346CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goux J.-P., Kulkarni S., Yoder M., Linderoth J. T. Master-worker: An enabling framework for master-worker applications on the computational grid. Cluster Comput. (2001) 4(1):63–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hämäläinen H., Honkala I., Litsyn S., Östergård P. Football pools–A game for mathematicians. Amer. Math. Monthly (1995) 102(7):579–588CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holm S., Sørensen M. M. The optimal graph partitioning problem: Solution method based on reducing symmetric nature and combinatorial cuts. OR Spectrum (1993) 15(1):1–8CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ivanov A. V. Constructive enumeration of incidence systems. Ann. Discrete Math. (1985) 114(26):227–246Google Scholar
  • Kaibel V., Pfetsch M. Packing and partitioning orbitopes. Math. Programming (2008) 114(1):1–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kreher D. L., Stinson D. R.Combinatorial Algorithms, Generation, Enumeration, and Search (1999) (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL) Google Scholar
  • Lenstra A. K., Lenstra H. W., Lovász L. Factoring polynomials with rational coefficients. Mathematische Annalen (1982) 261(4):515–534CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Linderoth J., Thain G., Wright S. J.User's Guide to MW (2007) (University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison) . http://www.cs.wisc.edu/condor/mwGoogle Scholar
  • Litzkow M. J., Livny M., Mutka M. W. Condor—A hunter of idle workstations. Proc. 8th Internat. Conf. Distributed Comput. Systems (1998) San Jose, CA(IEEE Press, Los Alamitos, CA) 104–111Google Scholar
  • Macambira E. M., Maculan N., de Souza C. C. Reducing symmetry of the SONET ring assignment problem using hierarchical inequalities. (2004) . Technical Report ES-636/04, Programa de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computação, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  • Margot F. Pruning by isomorphism in branch-and-cut. Math. Programming (2002) 94(1):71–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Margot F. Small covering designs by branch-and-cut. Math. Programming (2003) 94(2–3):207–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKay B. autoson—A distributed batch system for UNIX workstation networks (version 1.3). (1996) . Technical report, Computer Sciences Department, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  • McKay B. D. Isomorph-free exhaustive generation. J. Algorithms (1998) 26(2):306–324CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Méndez-Díaz I., Zabala P. A branch-and-cut algorithm for graph coloring. Discrete Appl. Math. (2006) 154(5):826–847CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mezmaz M., Melab N., Talbi E.-G. A grid-enabled branch and bound algorithm for solving challenging combinatorial optimization problems. (2006) . Research Report 5945, INRIA, Lille, FranceGoogle Scholar
  • Östergård P. R. J., Blass W. On the size of optimal binary codes of length 9 and covering radius 1. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory (2001) 47(6):2556–2557CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Östergård P. R. J., Wassermann A. A new lower bound for the football pool problem for six matches. J. Combinatorial Theory Ser. A (2002) 99(1):175–179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ostrowski J., Linderoth J., Rossi F., Smriglio S. Constraint orbital branching. IPCO 2008: 13th Conf. Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optim. (2008) 5035(Springer, Berlin) 225–239Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Read R. C., Alspach B., Hell P., Miller D. J. Every one a winner, or how to avoid isomorphism search when cataloguing combinatorial configurations. Algorithmic Aspects of Combinatorics. Annals of Discrete Mathematics (1978) 2(North-Holland, Amsterdam) 107–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherali H. D., Smith J. C. Improving zero-one model representations via symmetry considerations. Management Sci. (2001) 47(10):1396–1407LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wille L. T. The football pool problem for 6 matches: A new upper bound obtained by simulated annealing. J. Combinatorial Theory Ser. A (1987) 45(2):171–177CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xu Y., Ralphs T. K., Ladányi L., Saltzman M. J. ALPS: A framework for implementing parallel search algorithms. Proc. Ninth INFORMS Comput. Soc. Conf. (2005) Annapolis, MD(INFORMS, Hanover, MD) 319–334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.