Algorithms for Recognizing Economic Properties in Matrix Bid Combinatorial Auctions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1090.0336

References

  • Ausubel L. M., Milgrom P., Cramton P., Shoham Y., Steinberg R. The lovely but lonely Vickrey auction. Combinatorial Auctions (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 17–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ball M. O., Donohue G. L., Hoffman K., Cramton P., Shoham Y., Steinberg R. Auctions for the safe, efficient, and equitable allocation of airspace system resources. Combinatorial Auctions (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 507–538CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bevia C., Quinzii M., Silva J. A. Buying several indivisible goods. Math. Soc. Sci. (1999) 37(1):1–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bikhchandani S., Mamer J. W. Competitive equilibrium in an exchange economy with indivisibilities. J. Econom. Theory (1997) 74(2):385–413CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bikhchandani S., de Vries S., Schummer J., Vohra R., Dietrich B., Vohra R. V. Linear programming and Vickrey auctions. Mathematics of the Internet: E-Auction and Markets (2002) (Springer, New York) 75–116CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bleischwitz Y., Kliewer G. Accelerating Vickrey payment computation in combinatorial auctions for an airline alliance. WEA '05: Proc. 4th Internat. Workshop Experiment. Efficient Algorithms (2005) 3503(Springer, Berlin) 228–239Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cantillon E., Pesendorfer M., Cramton P., Shoham Y., Steinberg R. Auctioning bus routes: The London experience. Combinatorial Auctions (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 573–591CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caplice C., Sheffi Y., Cramton P., Shoham Y., Steinberg R. Combinatorial auctions for truckload transportation. Combinatorial Auctions (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 539–571CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cramton P., Shoham Y., Steinberg R.Combinatorial Auctions (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Day R. W. Expressing preferences with price-vector agents in combinatorial auctions. (2004) . Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, College ParkGoogle Scholar
  • Day R. W., Raghavan S. Matrix bidding in combinatorial auctions. Oper. Res. (2009) 57(4):916–933LinkGoogle Scholar
  • de Vries S., Vohra R. V. Combinatorial auctions: A survey. INFORMS J. Comput. (2003) 15(3):284–309LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dobzinski S., Nisan N., Schapira M. Approximation algorithms for combinatorial auctions with complement-free bidders. STOC '05: Proc. 37th Ann. ACM Sympos. Theory of Comput. (2005) Baltimore(ACM Press, New York) 610–618CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epstein R., Henríquez L., Catalán J., Weintraub G. Y., Martínez C. A combinational auction improves school meals in Chile. Interfaces (2002) 32(6):1–14LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eso M., Dietrich B., Vohra R. V. An iterative online auction for airline seats. Mathematics of the Internet: E-Auction and Markets (2001) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) 45–58Google Scholar
  • Fujishige S., Yang Z. A note on Kelso and Crawford's gross substitutes condition. Math. Oper. Res. (2003) 28(3):463–469LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goossens D. R., Spieksma F. C. R. Exact algorithms for the matrix bid auction. Comput. Oper. Res. (2009) 36(4):1090–1109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goossens D. R., Maas A. J. T., Spieksma F. C. R., van de Klundert J. J. Exact algorithms for procurement problems under a total quantity discount structure. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2007) 178(2):603–626CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grötschel M., Lovász L., Schrijver A. The ellipsoid method and its consequences in combinatorial optimization. Combinatorica (1981) 1(2):169–197CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gul F., Stacchetti E. Walrasian equilibrium with gross substitutes. J. Econom. Theory (1999) 87(1):95–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hohner G., Rich J., Ng E. d., Reid G., Davenport A. J., Kalagnanam J. R., Lee H. S., An C. Combinatorial and quantity-discount procurement auctions benefit Mars, Incorporated and its suppliers. Interfaces (2003) 33(1):23–35LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kelso A. S., Crawford V. P. Job matching, coalition formation, and gross substitutes. Econometrica (1982) 50(6):1483–1504CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khot S., Lipton R. J., Markakis E., Mehta A. Inapproximability results for combinatorial auctions with submodular utility functions. WINE '05: Proc. 1st Internat. Workshop on Internet and Network Econom. (2005) Hong Kong, China(Springer, New York) 92–101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ledyard J. O., Olson M., Porter D., Swanson J. A., Torma D. P. The first use of a combined-value auction for transportation services. Interfaces (2002) 32(5):4–12LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lehmann B., Lehmann D., Nisan N. Combinatorial auctions with decreasing marginal utilities. Games Econom. Behav. (2006) 55(2):270–296CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leyton-Brown K., Shoham Y., Cramton P., Shoham Y., Steinberg R. A test suite for combinatorial auctions. Combinatorial Auctions (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 451–478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leyton-Brown K., Shoham Y., Tennenholtz M. An algorithm for multi-unit combinatorial auctions. AAAI/IAAI '00: Proc. 17th National Conf. Artificial Intelligence 12th Conf. Innovative Appl. Artificial Intelligence (2000) Austin(AAAI Press/The MIT Press, Menlo Park, CA) 56–61Google Scholar
  • Moulin H.Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making (1988) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murota K., Tamura A. New characterizations of M-convex functions and their applications to economic equilibrium models with indivisibilities. Discrete Appl. Math. (2003) 131(2):495–512CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nisan N. Bidding and allocation in combinatorial auctions. EC '00: Proc. 2nd ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (2000) Minneapolis(ACM Press, New York) 1–12CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nisan N., Cramton P., Shoham Y., Steinberg R. Bidding languages for combinatorial auctions. Combinatorial Auctions (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 215–231CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nisan N., Segal I. The communication requirements of efficient allocations and supporting prices. J. Econom. Theory (2006) 129(1):192–224CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rassenti S. J., Smith V. L., Bulfin R. L. A combinatorial auction mechanism for airport time slot allocation. Bell J. Econom. (1982) 13(2):402–417CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reijnierse H., van Gellekom A., Potters J. A. M. Verifying gross substitutability. Econom. Theory (2002) 20(4):767–776CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothkopf M. H., Pekeç A., Harstad R. M. Computationally manageable combinational auctions. Management Sci. (1998) 44(8):1131–1147LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sandholm T. Algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions. Artificial Intelligence (2002) 135(1-2):1–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sandholm T., Suri S., Gilpin A., Levine D. Winner determination in combinatorial auction generalizations. AAMAS '02: Proc. First Internat. Joint Conf. Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2002) Bologna, Italy(ACM Press, New York) 69–76CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sandholm T., Suri S., Gilpin A., Levine D. CABOB: A fast optimal algorithm for winner determination in combinatorial auctions. Management Sci. (2005) 51(3):374–390LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sheffi Y. Combinatorial auctions in the procurement of transportation services. Interfaces (2004) 34(4):245–252LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.