Adaptive Auction Mechanism Design and the Incorporation of Prior Knowledge

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1090.0353

References

  • Ainslie G.Picoeconomics: The Strategic Interaction of Successive Motivational States Within the Person (1992) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ariely D., Simonson I. Buying, bidding, playing, or competing? Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions. J. Consumer Psych. (2003) 13(1–2):113–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atkeson C. G., Moore A. W., Schaal S. Locally weighted learning. Artificial Intelligence Rev. (1997) 11(15):11–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bapna R., Goes P., Gupta A. Analysis and design of business-to-consumer online auctions. Management Sci. (2003) 49(1):85–101LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bapna R., Jank W., Shmueli G. Price formation and its dynamics in online auctions. Decision Support Systems (2008a) 44(3):641–656CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bapna R., Goes P., Gupta A., Jin Y. User heterogeneity and its impact on electronic auction market design: An empirical exploration. MIS Quart. (2004) 28:21–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bapna R., Goes P., Gupta A., Karuga G. Predicting bidders' willingness to pay in online multiunit ascending auctions: Analytical and empirical insights. INFORMS J. Comput. (2008b) 20(3):345–355LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blum A., Hartline J. D. Near-optimal online auctions. SODA '05: Proc. 16th Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (2005) (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia) 1156–1163Google Scholar
  • Blum A., Kumar V., Rudra A., Wu F. Online learning in online auctions. SODA '03: Proc. 14th Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (2003) (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia) 137–146Google Scholar
  • Budish E. B., Takeyama L. N. Buy prices in online auctions: Irrationality on the Internet? Econom. Lett. (2001) 72(3):325–333CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Byde A. Applying evolutionary game theory to auction mechanism design. Proc. 4th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (2003) (ACM Press, New York) 192–193Google Scholar
  • Cliff D. Evolution of market mechanism through a continuous space of auction types. (2001) . Technical Report HPL-2001-326. HP Labs, Bristol, UKGoogle Scholar
  • Cramton P. C. The FCC spectrum auctions: An early assessment. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1997) 6(3):431–495CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dodonova A., Khoroshilov Y. Optimal auction design when bidders are loss averse. (2005) . Working paper, University of Ottawa, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  • Dholakia U. M., Simonson I. The effect of explicit reference points on consumer choice and online bidding behavior. Marketing Sci. (2005) 24(2):206–217LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Friedman J. H. On bias, variance, 0/1-loss, and the curse-of-dimensionality. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (1997) 1(1):55–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ginsburgh V., van Ours J. C. On organizing a sequential auction: Results from a natural experiment by Christie's. Oxford Econom. Papers (2007) 59(1):1–15CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jansen B. J., Mullen T. Sponsored search: An overview of the concept, history, and technology. Internat. J. Electronic Bus. (2008) 6(2):114–131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jeitschko T. Learning in sequential auctions. Southern Econom. J. (1998) 65(1):98–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Juda A. I., Parkes D. C. The sequential auction problem on eBay: An empirical analysis and a solution. Proc. 7th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (2006) (ACM, New York) 180–189CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee R. P. Mechanism design by competing sellers. Econometrica (1993) 61(6):1281–1312CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee R. P., McMillan J. Auctions and bidding. J. Econom. Literature (1987) 25(2):699–738Google Scholar
  • Mills T. C.Time Series Techniques for Economists (1990) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Myerson R. B. Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. (1981) 6(1):58–73LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pardoe D., Stone P., Saar-Tsechansky M., Tomak K. Adaptive mechanism design: A metalearning approach. Proc. Eighth Internat. Conf. Electronic Commerce (2006) (ACM, New York) 92–102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parkes D. C. Iterative combinatorial auctions: Achieving economic and computational efficiency. (2001) . Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  • Peters M. A competitive distribution of auctions. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1997) 64(1):97–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peters M., Severinov S. Competition among sellers who offer auction instead of prices. J. Econom. Theory (1997) 75(1):141–179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robbins H. Some aspects of the sequential design of experiments. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (1952) 58(5):527–535CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers A., David E., Schiff J., Kraus S., Jennings N. R. Learning environmental parameters for the design of optimal English auctions with discrete bid levels. AAMAS 2005 Workshop Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce VII (2005) (IFAAMAS, Utrecht, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Roth A. S., Ockenfels A. Last-minute bidding and the rules for ending second-price auctions: Evidence from eBay and Amazon auctions on the Internet. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92(4):1093–1103CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothkopf M. H., Harstad R. M. Modeling competitive bidding: A critical essay. Management Sci. (1994) 40(3):364–384LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Saar-Tsechansky M., Provost F. Active sampling for class probablity estimation and ranking. Machine Learn. (2004) 54(2):153–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shmueli G., Jank G., Aris A., Plaisant C., Shneiderman B. Exploring auction databases through interactive visualization. Decision Support Systems (2006) 42(3):1521–1538CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spall J. C. An overview of the simultaneous perturbation method for efficient optimization. Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest (1998) 19(4):482–492Google Scholar
  • Stanley K. O., Miikkulainen R. Evolving neural networks through augmenting topologies. Evolutionary Comput. (2002) 10(2):99–127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sutton R. S., Barto A. G.Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction (1998) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Weber R. J. Making more from less: Strategic demand reduction in the FCC spectrum auctions. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1997) 6(3):529–548CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yahoo! Search Marketing Blog Reserve prices. (2008) . Posted February 26; accessed September 10, 2009. http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2008/02/26/minimum-bidsGoogle Scholar
  • Zeithammer R. Forward-looking bidding in online auctions. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(3):462–476CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.