Solving the Order-Preserving Submatrix Problem via Integer Programming

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1090.0358

References

  • Ahuja R. K., Magnanti T. L., Orlin J. B.Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications (1993) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Balasundaram B., Butenko S., Trukhanov S. Novel approaches for analyzing biological networks. J. Combin. Optim. (2005) 10(1):23–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baz M., Hunsaker B., Brooks P., Gosavi A. Automated tuning of optimization software parameters. (2007) . Technical report, University of Pittsburgh Department of Industrial Engineering, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Dor A., Chor B., Karp R., Yakhini Z. Discovering local structure in gene expression data: The order-preserving submatrix problem. Proc. 6th Annual Internat. Conf. Comput. Biology (RECOMB '02) (2002) (ACM, New York) 49–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Dor A., Chor B., Karp R., Yakhini Z. Discovering local structure in gene expression data: The order-preserving submatrix problem. J. Comput. Biology (2003) 10(3–4):373–384CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Busygin S., Prokopyev O. A., Pardalos P. M. Feature selection for consistent biclustering via fractional 0–1 programming. J. Combin. Optim. (2005) 10(1):7–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Busygin S., Prokopyev O. A., Pardalos P. M. Biclustering in data mining. Comput. Oper. Res. (2008) 35(9):2964–2987CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cheng Y., Church G. M. Biclustering of expression data. Proc. Eighth Internat. Conf. Intelligent Systems Molecular Biology (2000) (AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA) 93–103Google Scholar
  • Cheung L., Cheung D. W., Kao B., Yip K. Y. On mining micro-array data by order-preserving submatrix. Internat. J. Bioinformatics Res. Appl. (2007) 3(1):42–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Downey R. G., Fellows M. R.Parameterized Complexity (1999) (Springer-Verlag, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forrester R. J., Greenberg H. J. Quadratic binary programming models in computational biology. Algorithmic Oper. Res. (2008) 3(2):110–129Google Scholar
  • Fung H. K., Rao S., Floudas C. A., Prokopyev O. A., Pardalos P. M., Rendl F. Computational comparison studies of quadratic assignment like formulations for the in silico sequence selection problem in de novo protein design. J. Combin. Optim. (2005) 10(1):41–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garey M. R., Johnson D. S.Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness (1979) (W. H. Freeman & Company, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hedenfalk I., Duggan D., Chen Y., Radmacher M., Bittner M., Simon R., Meltzer P., et al. Gene-expression profiles in hereditary breast cancer. New England J. Medicine (2001) 344(8):539–548CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • HumanGene Expression Index (2009) . HuGE index.org. http://www.hugeindex.orgGoogle Scholar
  • ILOG (2007) . CPLEX 11.0 User's Manual. ILOG CPLEX Division, Incline Village, NVGoogle Scholar
  • Madeira S. C., Oliveira A. L. Biclustering algorithms for biological data analysis: A survey. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biology Bioinformatics (2004) 1(1):24–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meneses C. N., Lu Z., Oliveira C. A. S., Pardalos P. M. Optimal solutions for the closest-string problem via integer programming. INFORMS J. Comput. (2004) 16(4):419–429LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Murray A. T., Church R. L. Constructing and selecting adjacency constraints. INFOR (1996) 34(3):232–248Google Scholar
  • Murray A. T., Church R. L. Facets for node packing. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1997) 101(3):598–608CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Padberg M. W. On the facial structure of set packing polyhedra. Math. Programming (1973) 5(1):199–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schensted C. Longest increasing and decreasing subsequences. Canadian J. Math. (1961) 13(2):179–191CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherali H. D., Adams W. P.A Reformulation-Linearization Technique for Solving Discrete and Continuous Nonconvex Problems (1998) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Tan M. P., Broach J. R., Floudas C. A. A novel clustering approach and prediction of optimal number of clusters: Global optimum search with enhanced positioning. J. Global Optim. (2007) 39(3):323–346CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trapp A., Prokopyev O. A., Busygin S. Finding checkerboard patterns via fractional 0–1 programming. J. Combin. Optim. (2008) . ePub ahead of print September 18, http://www.springerlink.com/content/kt061p80467t8w11Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.