An Automated Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning System

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1090.0374

References

  • Ahnesjö A. Collapsed cone convolution of radiant energy for photon dose calculation in heterogeneous media. Medical Phys. (1989) 16(4):577–592CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bahr G. K., Kereiakes J. G., Horwitz H., Finney R., Galvin J., Goode K. The method of linear programming applied to radiation treatment planning. Radiology (1968) 91(4):686–693CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bedford J. L., Webb S. Direct-aperture optimization applied to selection of beam orientations in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Phys. Medicine Biol. (2007) 52(2):479–498CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bortfeld T. IMRT: A review and preview. Phys. Medicine Biol. (2006) 51(13):R363–R379CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boyer A. L., Butler E. B., DiPetrillo T. A., Engler M. J., Fraass B., Grant W., Ling C. C., et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy: Current status and issues of interest. Internat. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys. (2001) 51(4):880–914CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • D'Souza W. D., Meyer R. R., Shi L. Y. Selection of beam orientations in intensity-modulated radiation therapy using single-beam indices and integer programming. Phys. Medicine Biol. (2004) 49(15):3465–3481CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ehrgott M., Holder A., Reese J. Beam selection in radiotherapy design. Linear Algebra Its Appl. (2008) 428(5–6):1272–1312CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Girinsky T., Pichenot C., Beaudre A., Ghalibafian M., Lefkopoulos D. Is intensity-modulated radiotherapy better than conventional radiation treatment and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for mediastinal masses in patients with Hodgkin's disease, and is there a role for beam orientation optimization and dose constraints assigned to virtual volumes? Internat. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys. (2006) 64(1):218–226CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holder A. Designing radiotherapy plans with elastic constraints and interior point methods. Health Care Management Sci. (2003) 6(1):5–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kessler M. L., McShan D. L., Epelman M. A., Vineberg K. A., Eisbruch A., Lawrence T. S., Fraass B. A. Costlets: A generalized approach to cost functions for automated optimization of IMRT treatment plans. Optim. Engrg. (2005) 6(4):421–448CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee E. K., Fox T., Crocker I. Integer programming applied to intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning. Ann. Oper. Res. (2003) 119(1–4):165–181CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee E. K., Fox T., Crocker I. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Internat. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys. (2006) 64(1):301–320CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lim G. J., Choi J., Mohan R. Iterative solution methods for beam angle and fluence map optimization in intensity modulated radiation therapy planning. OR Spectrum (2008) 30(2):289–309CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mackie T. R., Scrimger J. W., Battista J. J. A convolution method of calculating dose for 15-MV x-rays. Medical Phys. (1985) 12(2):188–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mohan R., Chui C., Lidofsky L. Differential pencil beam dose computation model for photons. Medical Phys. (1986) 13(1):64–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Price R. A., Murphy S., McNeeley S. W., Ma C. M. C., Horwitz E., Movsas B., Raben A., Pollack A. A method for increased dose conformity and segment reduction for SMLC delivered IMRT treatment of the prostate. Internat. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys. (2003) 57(3):843–852CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pugachev A., Lei X. Pseudo beam's-eye-view as applied to beam orientation selection in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Internat. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys. (2001) 51(5):1361–1370CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Romeijn H. E., Ahuja R. K., Dempsey J. F., Kumar A. A new linear programming approach to radiation therapy treatment planning problems. Oper. Res. (2006) 54(2):201–216LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shepard D. M., Ferris M. C., Olivera G. H., Mackie T. R. Optimizing the delivery of radiation therapy to cancer patients. SIAM Rev. (1999) 41(4):721–744CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stein J., Mohan R., Wang X. H., Bortfeld T., Wu Q. W., Preiser K., Ling C. C., Schlegel W. Number and orientations of beams in intensity-modulated radiation treatments. Medical Phys. (1997) 24(2):149–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Veldeman L., Madani I., Hulstaert F., De Meerleer G., Mareel M., De Neve W. Evidence behind use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy: A systematic review of comparative clinical studies. Lancet Oncology (2008) 9(4):367–375CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Webb S. The physical basis of IMRT and inverse planning. British J. Radiology (2003) 76(910):678–689CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang Y., Xing L. Clinical knowledge-based inverse treatment planning. Phys. Medicine Biol. (2004) 49(22):5101–5117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang R. J., Dai J. R., Yang Y., Hu Y. M. Beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using mixed integer programming. Phys. Medicine Biol. (2006) 51(15):3653–3666CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.