Resource Allocation via Message Passing

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1100.0395

References

  • Aldous D. Asymptotics in the random assignment problem. Probab. Theory Related Fields (1992) 93:507–534CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aldous D. The ζ(2) limit in the random assignment problem. Random Struct. Algorithms (2001) 18(4):381–418CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aldous D., Steele J. M., Kesten H. The objective method: Probabilistic combinatorial optimization and local weak convergence. Probability on Discrete Structures (2003) (Springer, Berlin) 1–72Google Scholar
  • Aliprantis C. D., Tourky R., Yannelis N. C. A theory of value with non-linear prices: Equilibrium analysis beyond vector lattices. J. Econom. Theory (2001) 100(1):22–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow K. J., Hurwicz L.Studies in Resource Allocation (1977) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aurell E., Gordon U., Kirkpatrick S., Saul L. K., Weiss Y., Bottou L. Comparing beliefs, surveys, and random walks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2005) 17(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 49–56Google Scholar
  • Bayati M., Shah D., Sharma M. Maximum weight matching via max-product belief propagation. Proc. IEEE Internat. Sympos. Inform. Theory, Adelaide, Australia (2005) (IEEE, New York) 1763–1767CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benedetto S., Divsalar D., Montorsi G., Pollara F. Soft-output decoding algorithms in iterative decoding of turbo codes. (1996) . Telecommunications and Data Acquisition Progress Report 42–142, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, 63–87Google Scholar
  • Berliant M., Dunz K. Nonlinear supporting prices: The superadditive case. J. Math. Econom. (1990) 19(4):357–367CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berrou C., Glavieux A., Thitimajshima P. Near Shannon limit error-correcting coding and decoding: Turbo-codes. Proc. IEEE Internat. Comm. Conf., Geneva (1993) 2(IEEE, New York) 1064–1070CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertsekas D. P.Constrained Optimization and Lagrange Multiplier Methods (1982) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Braunstein A., Zecchina R. Survey propagation as local equilibrium equations. J. Statist. Mech. (2004) 2004PO6007CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Braunstein A., Mézard M., Zecchina R. Survey propagation: An algorithm for satisfiability. Random Struct. Algorithms (2005) 27(2):201–226CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coughlan J. M., Ferreira S. J. Finding deformable shapes using loopy belief propagation. Eur. Conf. Comput. Vision, Vol 2352 (2002) (Springer, Berlin) 53–73Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fazel M., Chiang M. Network utility maximization with nonconcave utilities using sum-of-squares method. Proc. 44th Conf. Decision Control (2005) 2(IEEE, New York) 1867–1874CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman W. T., Pasztor E. C., Carmichael O. T. Learning low-level vision. Internat. J. Comput. Vision (2000) 40(1):25–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fréville A. The multidimensional 0–1 knapsack problem: An overview. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2004) 155(1):1–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frey B. J.Graphical Models for Machine Learning and Digital Communication (1998) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gamarnik D., Nowicki T., Swirscsz G. Maximum weight independent sets and matchings in sparse random graphs: Exact results using the local weak convergence method. Random Struct. Algorithms (2005) 28(1):76–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hande P., Zhang S., Chiang M. Distributed rate allocation for inelastic flows. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking (2005) 15(6):1240–1253CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kellerer H., Pferschy U., Pisinger D.Knapsack Problems (2004) (Springer, Berlin) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelly F. Charging and rate control for elastic traffic. Eur. Trans. Telecomm. (1997) 8(1):33–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee J. W., Mazumdar R. R., Shroff N. B. Non-convex optimization and rate control for multi-class services in the Internet. IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking (2005) 13(4):841–853CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leone M., Pagnani A. Predicting protein functions with message passing algorithms. Bioinformatics (2005) 21(2):239–247CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Letovsky S., Kasif S. Predicting protein function from protein/protein interaction data: A probabilistic approach. Bioinformatics (2003) 19(Supplement 1):i197–i204CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malioutov D. M., Johnson J. K., Willsky A. S. Walk-sums and belief propagation in Gaussian graphical models. J. Machine Learn. Res. (2006) 7(December):2031–2064Google Scholar
  • Maneva E. N., Mossel E., Wainwright M. J. A new look at survey propagation and its generalizations. Proc. 16th Annual ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (2005) Philadelphia:1089–1098Society for Industrial and Applied MathematicsGoogle Scholar
  • McCallum A., Meek C., Kjærulff U. Efficiently inducing features of conditional random fields. Proc. 19th Conf. Uncertainty Artificial Intelligence (2003) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco) 403–410Google Scholar
  • Mézard M., Parisi G., Zecchina R. Analytic and algorithmic solution of random satisfiability problems. Science (2002) 297(5582):812–815CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moallemi C. C., Van Roy B. Consensus propagation. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory (2006) 52(11):4753–4766CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moallemi C. C., Van Roy B. Convergence of the min-sum algorithm for convex optimization. (2007) . Technical report, Management Science and Engineering Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Moallemi C. C., Van Roy B. Convergence of min-sum message passing for quadratic optimization. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory (2009) 55(5):2413–2423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Montanari A., Tse D. Analysis of belief propagation for non-linear problems: The example of CDMA (or: How to prove Tanaka's formula). Proc. IEEE Inform. Theory Workshop, Punta del Este, Uruguay (2006) 160–164CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Montanari A., Prabhakar B., Tse D. Belief propagation based multi-user detection. Proc. 43rd Allerton Conf. Comm. Control Comput. (2005) Monticello, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Mordukhovich B. S. Nonlinear prices in nonconvex economies with classical Pareto and strong Pareto optimal allocations. Positivity (2005) 9(3):541–568CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pinto D., McCallum A., Wei X., Croft W. B. Table extraction using conditional random fields. Proc. 26th Annual Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. Res., Dev. Inform. (2003) (ACM, New York) 235–242CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richardson T., Urbanke R., Marcus B., Rosenthal J. An introduction to the analysis of iterative coding systems. Codes, Systems, and Graphical Models. (2001a) (Springer, New York) 1–37IMA Volume in Mathmatics and Its ApplicationsCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richardson T., Urbanke R. The capacity of low-density parity check codes under message-passing decoding. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory (2001b) 47(2):599–618CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rockafellar R. T.Convex Analysis (1970) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rockafeller R. T. Augmented Lagrange multiplier functions and duality in nonconvex programming. SIAM J. Control (1974) 12(2):268–285CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rusmevichientong P., Van Roy B. An analysis of belief propagation on the turbo decoding graph with Gaussian densities. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory (2001) 47(2):745–765CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shenker S. Fundamental design issues for the future Internet. IEEE J. Selected Areas Comm. (1995) 13(7):1176–1188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spence M. Nonlinear prices and welfare. J. Public Econom. (1977) 8(1):1–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun J., Shum H.-Y., Zheng N.-N. Stereo matching using belief propagation. Eur. Conf. Comput. Vision (ECCV 2002), Vol 2351 (2002) (Springer, Berlin) 450–452Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sutton C. A., Rohanimanesh K., McCallum A. Dynamic conditional random fields: Factorized probabilistic models for labeling and segmenting sequence data. Proc. 21st Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. ACM Internat. Conf. Proc. Ser. (2004) 69(ACM, New York) 99CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Talagrand M.Spin Glasses: A Challenge for Mathematicians: Cavity and Mean Field Models. (2003) 46(Springer, Berlin) . Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer GrenzgebieteGoogle Scholar
  • Tatikonda S. C., Jordan M. I., Darwiche A., Friedman N. Loopy belief propagation and Gibbs measures. Proc. 18th Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (2002) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco) 493–500Google Scholar
  • Wainwright M. J., Jaakkola T., Willsky A. S. Tree consistency and bounds on the performance of the max-product algorithm and its generalizations. Statist. Comput. (2004) 14(2):143–166CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weiss Y., Freeman W. T. Correctness of belief propagation in Gaussian graphical models of arbitrary topology. Neural Comput. (2001a) 13(10):2173–2200CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weiss Y., Freeman W. T. On the optimality of solutions of the max-product belief propagation algorithm in arbitrary graphs. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory (2001b) 47(2):736–744CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.