An Asymptotic Test of Optimality Conditions in Multiresponse Simulation Optimization

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1100.0438

References

  • Bashyam S., Fu M. C. Optimization of (s, S) inventory systems with random lead times and a service level constraint. Management Sci. (1998) 44(12, Part 2):243–256LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bettonvil B., del Castillo E., Kleijnen J. P. C. Statistical testing of optimality conditions in multiresponse simulation-based optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2009) 199(2):448–458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Efron B., Tibshirani R. J.An Introduction to the Bootstrapped (1993) (Chapman & Hall, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fu M. C. Optimization for simulation: Theory vs. practice. INFORMS J. Comput. (2002) 14(3):192–215LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gill P. E., Murray W., Wright M. H.Practical Optimization (2000) 12th ed.(Academic Press, London) Google Scholar
  • Glasserman P.Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering (2003) (Springer, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Higle J. L., Sen S. Statistical verification of optimality conditions for stochastic programs with recourse. Ann. Oper. Res. (1991) 30(1–4):215–240CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karaesmen I., van Ryzin G. Overbooking with substitutable inventory classes. Oper. Res. (2004) 52(1):83–104LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Khuri A. I., Ghosh S., Rao C. R. Multiresponse surface methodology. Handbook of Statistics, Design and Analysis of Experiments (1996) 13(Elsevier, Amsterdam) 377–406CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kleijnen J. P. C.Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiments (2008) (Springer Science + Business Media, New York) . [Chinese translation published by Publishing House of Electronics Industry, Beijing, 2010.]Google Scholar
  • Kleijnen J. P. C., Wan J. Optimization of simulated systems: OptQuest and alternatives. Simulation Modelling Practice Theory (2007) 15(3):354–362CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kodde D. A., Palm F. C. Wald criteria for jointly testing equality and inequality restrictions. Econometrica (1986) 54(5):1243–1248CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lehmann E. L.Elements of Large-Sample Theory (1999) (Springer, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao C. R., Lecam L. M., Neyman J. Least squares theory using an estimated dispersion matrix and its application to measurement of signals. Proc. Fifth Berkeley Sympos. Math. Statist. Probab. (1967) I(University of California Press, Berkeley) 355–372Google Scholar
  • Rubinstein R. Y., Shapiro A.Discrete Event Systems: Sensitivity Analysis and Stochastic Optimization by the Score Function Method (1993) (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) Google Scholar
  • Safizadeh M. H. Minimizing the bias and variance of the gradient estimate in RSM simulation studies. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2002) 136(1):121–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro A. Towards a unified theory of inequality constrained testing in multivariate analysis. Internat. Statist. Rev. (1988) 56(1):49–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro A., Homem-de-Mello T. A simulation-based approach to two-stage stochastic programming with recourse. Math. Programming (1998) 81(3):301–325CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spall J. C.Introduction to Stochastic Search and Optimization: Estimation, Simulation, and Control (2003) (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Theil H.Principles of Econometrics (1971) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Zazanis M. A., Suri R. Convergence rates of finite-difference sensitivity estimates for stochastic systems. Oper. Res. (1993) 41(4):694–703LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.