An Improved Branch-and-Bound Method for Maximum Monomial Agreement
Published Online:17 Jun 2011https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1110.0459
References
- Chance constrained uncertain classification via robust optimization. Math. Programming (2011) 127(1):115–173Crossref, Google Scholar
- Logical analysis of numerical data. Math. Programming (1997) 79(1–3):163–190Crossref, Google Scholar
- Finding essential attributes from binary data. Ann. Math. Artificial Intelligence (2003) 39(3):223–257Crossref, Google Scholar
- An implementation of logical analysis of data. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. (2000) 12(2):292–306Crossref, Google Scholar
- Maximizing agreements and coagnostic learning. Theoret. Comput. Sci. (2006) 350(1):24–39Crossref, Google Scholar
- Binarized support vector machines. INFORMS J. Comput. (2010) 22(1):154–167Link, Google Scholar
- A simple, fast, and effective rule learner. Proc. 16th National Conf. Artificial Intelligence (1999) (AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA) 335–342Google Scholar
- Cause-effect relationships and partially defined Boolean functions. Ann. Oper. Res. (1988) 16(1–4):299–326Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Möhring R., Raman R. Branch-and-bound algorithms for the test cover problem. Proc. 10th Annual Eur. Symp. Algorithms, Vol. 2461 (2002) (Springer, Berlin) 223–233Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceCrossref, Google Scholar
- Linear programming boosting via column generation. Machine Learn. (2002) 46(1–3):225–254Crossref, Google Scholar
- Computing the maximum bichromatic discrepancy, with applications to computer graphics and machine learning. J. Comput. Sys. Sci. (1996) 52(3):453–470Crossref, Google Scholar
- PEBBL 1.0 user guide. (2006) . RUTCOR Research Report RRR 19-2006, RUTCOR, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJGoogle Scholar
- The maximum box problem and its application to data analysis. Comput. Optim. Appl. (2002) 23(2):285–298Crossref, Google Scholar
- Optimal hardness results for maximizing agreements with monomials. Proc. 21st Annual IEEE Conf. Comput. Complexity (2006) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ) 226–236Crossref, Google Scholar
- UCI Machine Learning Repository. (2010) . University of California, Irvine, Irvine. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/mlGoogle Scholar
- A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J. Comput. System Sci. (1997) 55(1):119–139Crossref, Google Scholar
- Predictive learning via rule ensembles. Ann. Appl. Statist. (2008) 2(3):916–954Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Fürnkranz J., Joachims T. Boosting classifiers with tightened L0-relaxation penalties. Proc. 27th Internat. Conf. Machine Learning (2010) (Omnipress, Madison, WI) 383–390Google Scholar
- , Aple C., Liu B., Parthasarathy S., Skillicorn D. Boosting optimal logical patterns using noisy data. Proc. 7th SIAM Internat. Conf. Data Mining (2007) (SIAM, Philadelphia) 228–236Crossref, Google Scholar
- Classification on proximity data with LP-machines. Proc. 9th Internat. Conf. Artificial Neural Networks (1999) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ) 304–309Crossref, Google Scholar
- Learning in the presence of malicious errors. SIAM J. Comput. (1993) 22(4):807–837Crossref, Google Scholar
- Toward efficient agnostic learning. Machine Learn. (1994) 17(2–3):115–141Crossref, Google Scholar
- Ruling out PTAS for graph min-bisection, dense k-subgraph, and bipartite clique. SIAM J. Comput. (2006) 36(4):1025–1071Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Smola A. J., Bartlett P. J., Schölkopf B., Schuurmans D. Robust ensemble learning. Advances in Large Margin Classifiers (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 207–219Crossref, Google Scholar
- The strength of weak learnability. Machine Learn. (1990) 5(2):197–227Crossref, Google Scholar
- Improved boosting algorithms using confidence-rate predictions. Machine Learn. (1999) 37(3):297–336Crossref, Google Scholar
- Smooth boosting and learning with malicious noise. J. Machine Learn. Res. (2003) 4:633–648Google Scholar
- Computer Systems That Learn (1991) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco) Google Scholar

