Robust Optimization in Simulation: Taguchi and Krige Combined

References

• Ankenman B., Nelson B. L., Staum J. Stochastic kriging for simulation metamodeling. Oper. Res. (2010) 58(2):371–382Link, Google Scholar
• Barton R. R., Meckesheimer M., Henderson S. G., Nelson B. L. Metamodel-based simulation optimization. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science (2006) 13(Elsevier, Amsterdam) 535–574Google Scholar
• Batur D., Choobineh F. A quantile-based approach to system selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2010) 202(3):764–772Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bekki J. M., Fowler J. W., Mackulak G. T., Kulahci M. Simulation-based cycle-time quantile estimation in manufacturing settings employing non-FIFO dispatching policies. J. Simulation (2009) 3(2):69–83Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D., Nohadani O., Teo K. M. Robust optimization for unconstrained simulation-based problems. Oper. Res. (2010) 58(1):161–178Link, Google Scholar
• Beyer H.-G., Sendhoff B. Robust optimization—A comprehensive survey. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. (2007) 196(33–34):3190–3218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgonovo E. Sensitivity analysis with finite changes: An application to modified EOQ models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2010) 200(1):127–138Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgonovo E., Peccati L. Global sensitivity analysis in inventory management. Internat. J. Production Econom. (2007) 108(1–2):302–313Crossref, Google Scholar
• Branke J., Schmidt C., Schmeck H., Spector L., Goodman E. D., Wu A., Langdon W. B., Voight H.-M., Gen M., Sen S., et al. Efficient fitness estimation in noisy environments. Proc. Genetic Evol. Comput. (2001) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco) 243–250Google Scholar
• Cannella S., Ciancimino E., Dangelmaier W., Blecken A., Delius R., Klöpfer S. Up-to-date supply chain management: The coordinated (S, R) order-up-to. Adv. Manufacturing Sustainable Logist.: 8th Internat. Heinz Nixdorf Sympos. (2010) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) 175–185Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen X., Ankenman B., Nelson B. L. The effects of common random numbers on stochastic Kriging metamodels. Indust. Engrg. (2010) 1:1–31Google Scholar
• Chen Y., Xu M., Zhang Z. G. A risk-averse newsvendor model under CVaR criterion. Oper. Res. (2009) 57(4):1040–1044Link, Google Scholar
• Cressie N. A. C.Statistics for Spatial Data (1993) revised ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dehlendorff C., Kulahci M., Andersen K. Designing simulation experiments with controllable and uncontrollable factors for applications in healthcare. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. C (2011) 60(1):31–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dehlendorff C., Kulahci M., Merser S., Andersen K. Conditional value at risk as a measure for waiting time in simulations of hospital units. Quality Tech. Quant. Management (2010) 7(3):321–336Crossref, Google Scholar
• del Castillo E.Process Optimization: A Statistical Approach (2007) (Springer, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellino G., Kleijnen J. P. C., Meloni C. Robust optimization in simulation: Taguchi and response surface methodology. Internat. J. Production Econom. (2010) 125(1):52–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellino G., Lino P., Meloni C., Rizzo A., Grosan C., Abraham A., Ishibuchi H. Enhanced evolutionary algorithms for MDO: A control engineering perspective. Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithms (2007) 75(Springer, Berlin) 41–80Studies in Computational IntelligenceCrossref, Google Scholar
• de Rocquigny E., Devictor N., Tarantola S., de Rocquigny E., Devictor N., Tarantola S. Uncertainty settings and natures of uncertainty. Uncertainty in Industrial Practice: A Guide to Quantitative Uncertainty Management. (2008) (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) 199–212Crossref, Google Scholar
• Efron B., Tibshirani R. J.An Introduction to the Bootstrap (1993) (Chapman & Hall, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• García-González J., Parrilla E., Mateo A. Risk-averse profit-based optimal scheduling of a hydro-chain in the day-ahead electricity market. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2007) 181(3):1354–1369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Helton J. C. Conceptual and computational basis for the quantification of margins and uncertainty. (2009) . Report SAND2009-3055, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NMGoogle Scholar
• Hillier F. S., Lieberman G. J.Introduction to Operations Research (2001) 7th ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Jin Y., Sendhoff B., Fonseca C. M., Fleming P. J., Zitzler E., Deb K., Thiele L. Trade-off between performance and robustness: An evolutionary multiobjective approach. Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization (2003) 2632(Springer, Berlin) 237–252Lecture Notes in Computer ScienceCrossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney R. L., Raiffa H.Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (1976) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Kleijnen J. P. C.Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiments (2008) (Springer, New York) Google Scholar
• Kleijnen J. P. C., Cochran J. J., Cox L. A., Keskinocak P., Kharoufeh J. P., Smith J. C. Sensitivity analysis of simulation models. Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science (2010) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) 1–10Google Scholar
• Kleijnen J. P. C., Pierreval H., Zhang J. Methodology for determining the acceptability of given designs in uncertain environments. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2011) 209(2):176–183Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleijnen J. P. C., Sanchez S. M., Lucas T. W., Cioppa T. M. State-of-the-art review: A user's guide to the brave new world of designing simulation experiments. INFORMS J. Comput. (2005) 17(3):263–289Link, Google Scholar
• Koch P. N., Mavris D., Allen J. K., Mistree F. Modeling noise in approximation-based robust design: A comparison and critical discussion. ASME Design Engrg. Tech. Conf. (1998) Atlanta(ASME, New York) 1–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee Y., Nelder J. A. Robust design. J. Quality Tech. (2003) 35(1):2–12Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee K.-H., Park G.-J. A global robust optimization using Kriging based approximation model. J. Japan Soc. Mech. Engrg. (2006) 49(3):779–788Google Scholar
• Lehman J. S., Santner T. J., Notz W. I. Designing computer experiments to determine robust control variables. Statistica Sinica (2004) 14(2):571–590Google Scholar
• Lophaven S. N., Nielsen H. B., Søndergaard J. DACE: A MATLAB Kriging toolbox (version 2.0). (2002) . Technical Report IMM-TR-2002-12, Technical University of Denmark, LyngbyGoogle Scholar
• MathWorks Inc.Statistics Toolbox (2005) (MathWorks, Natick, MA) . User's manualGoogle Scholar
• Miettinen K. M.Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) Google Scholar
• Miranda A. K., del Castillo E. Robust parameter design optimization of simulation experiments using stochastic perturbation methods. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2011) 62(1):198–205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myers R. H., Montgomery D. C., Anderson-Cook C. M.Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments (2009) 3rd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Nair V. N., Abraham B., Mackay J., Box G., Kacker R. N., Lorenzen T. J., Lucas J. M., et al. Taguchi's parameter design: A panel discussion. Technometrics (1992) 34(2):127–161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narasimhan R., Talluri S. Perspectives on risk management in supply chains. J. Oper. Management (2009) 27(2):114–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Natarajan K., Pachamanova D., Sim M. Constructing risk measures from uncertainty sets. Oper. Res. (2009) 57(5):1129–1141Link, Google Scholar
• Neumaier A., Shcherbina O., Huyer W., Vinkó T. A comparison of complete global optimization solvers. Math. Programming Ser. B (2005) 103(2):335–356Crossref, Google Scholar
• Novikov I., Oberman B. Optimization of large simulations using statistical software. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. (2007) 51(5):2747–2752Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oberguggenberger M., King J., Schmelzer B. Classical and imprecise probability methods for sensitivity analysis in engineering: A case study. Internat. J. Approximate Reasoning (2009) 50(4):680–693Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park G.-J., Lee T.-H., Lee K. H., Hwang K.-H. Robust design: An overview. AIAA J. (2006) 44(1):181–191Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao S., Goldsby T. J. Supply chain risks: A review and typology. Internat. J. Logist. Management (2009) 20(1):97–123Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sacks J., Welch W. J., Mitchell T. J., Wynn H. P. Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statist. Sci. (1989) 4(4):409–435Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santner T. J., Williams B. J., Notz W. I.The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments (2003) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shukla S. K., Tiwari M. K., Wan H.-D., Shankar R. Optimization of the supply chain network: Simulation, Taguchi, and psychoclonal algorithm embedded approach. Comput. Indust. Engrg. (2010) 58(1):29–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simar L., Wilson P. W. Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management Sci. (1998) 44(1):49–61Link, Google Scholar
• Sordo M. A. Comparing tail variabilities of risks by means of the excess wealth order. Insurance: Math. Econom. (2009) 45(3):466–469Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stinstra E., den Hertog D. Robust optimization using computer experiments. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2008) 191(3):816–837Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taguchi G.System of Experimental Designs (1987) Vols. 1 and 2(UNIPUB/Krauss International, White Plains, New York) Google Scholar
• van Beers W. C. M., Kleijnen J. P. C. Kriging for interpolation in random simulation. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2003) 54(3):255–262Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Beers W. C. M., Kleijnen J. P. C., Ingalls R. G., Rossetti M. D., Smith J. S., Peters B. A. Kriging interpolation in simulation: A survey. Proc. 2004 Winter Simulation Conf. (2004) (IEEE, Washington, DC) 113–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu C. F. J., Hamada M.Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Parameter Design Optimization (2000) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Wu J., Li J., Wang S., Cheng T. C. E. A note on mean-variance analysis of the newsvendor model with stockout cost. Omega (2009) 37(3):724–730Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin Y., Madanat S. M., Lu X.-Y. Robust improvement schemes for road networks under demand uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2009) 198(2):470–479Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu G. Robust economic order quantity models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1997) 100(3):482–493Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zipkin P. H.Foundations of Inventory Management (2000) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar