Separation and Extension of Cover Inequalities for Conic Quadratic Knapsack Constraints with Generalized Upper Bounds

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1120.0511

References

  • Atamtürk A. Cover and pack inequalities for (mixed) integer programming. Ann. Opre. Res. (2005) 139:21–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atamtürk A, Narayanan V. Polymatroids and risk minimization in discrete optimization. Oper. Res. Lett. (2008) 36:618–622CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atamtürk A, Narayanan V. The submodular 0–1 knapsack polytope. Discrete Optim. (2009) 6:333–344CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atamtürk A, Narayanan V. Conic mixed-integer rounding cuts. Math. Programming (2010) 122:1–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atamtürk A, Narayanan V. Lifting for conic mixed-integer programming. Math. Programming (2011) 126:351–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balas E. Facets of the knapsack polytope. Math. Programming (1975) 8:146–164CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boyd S, Vandenberghe L. Convex Optimization (2004) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Büsing C, Koster AMCA, Kutschka M. Recoverable robust knapsacks: The discrete scenario case. Optim. Lett. (2011) 5(3):379–392CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cezik MT, Iyengar G. Cuts for mixed 0–1 conic programming. Math. Programming (2005) 104:179–202CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crowder H, Johnson EL, Padberg M. Solving large-scale 0–1 linear programming problems. Oper. Res. (1983) 31:803–834LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ferreira CE, Martin A, Weismantel R. Solving multiple knapsack problems by cutting planes. SIAM J. Optim. (1996) 6:858–877CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fujishige S. Submodular Functions and Optimization (2005) Vol. 58(Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam) Google Scholar
  • Gu Z, Nemhauser GL, Savelsbergh MWP. Lifted cover inequalities for 0–1 integer programs: Computation. INFORMS J. Comput. (1998) 10:427–437LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gu Z, Nemhauser GL, Savelsbergh MWP. Lifted cover inequalities for 0–1 integer programs: Complexity. INFORMS J. Comput. (1999) 11:117–123LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hammer PL, Johnson EL, Peled UN. Facet of regular 0–1 polytopes. Math. Programming (1975) 8:179–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hartvigsen D, Zemel E. The complexity of lifted inequalities for the knapsack problem. Discrete Appl. Math. (1992) 39:113–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iwata S. Submodular function minimization. Math. Programming (2008) 112:45–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson EL, Padberg MW. A note of the knapsack problem with special ordered sets. Oper. Res. Lett. (1981) 1:18–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaparis K, Letchford AN. Cover inequalities. (2010) . Technical report, Lancaster UniversityGoogle Scholar
  • Karp RM, Miller RE, Thatcher JW. Reducibility among combinatorial problems. Complexity of Computer Computations (1972) (Plenum Press, New York) 85–103CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klabjan D, Nemhauser GL, Tovey C. The complexity of cover inequality separation. Oper. Res. Lett. (1998) 23:35–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klopfenstein O, Nace D. Cover inequalities for a robust knapsack sets—Application to the robust bandwidth packing problem. Networks (2012) 59(1):59–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nemhauser GL, Vance PH. Lifted cover facets of the 0–1 knapsack polytope with GUB constraints. Opre. Res. Lett. (1994) 16:255–263CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wolsey LA. Faces for a linear inequality in 0–1 variables. Math. Programming (1975) 8:165–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wolsey LA. Valid inequalities for 0–1 knapsacks and mips with generalised upper bound constraints. Discrete Appl. Math. (1990) 29:251–261CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zemel E. Easily computable facets of the knapsack polytope. Math. Oper. Res. (1989) 14:760–764LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.