Backdoor Branching

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1120.0531

References

  • Achterberg T (2007) Constraint integer programming. Doctoral dissertation, Technischen Universität, Berlin.Google Scholar
  • Achterberg T, Koch T, Martin A (2005) Branching rules revisited. Oper. Res. Lett. 33:42–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Achterberg T, Koch T, Martin A (2006) MIPLIB 2003. Oper. Res. Lett. 34:361–372.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Applegate D, Bixby RE, Chvatal V, Cook W (1995) Finding cuts in the TSP. Technical Report 95-09, DIMACS, Piscataway, NJ.Google Scholar
  • Balas E, Ceria S, Cornuéjols G, Natraj N (1996) Gomory cuts revisited. Oper. Res. Lett. 19:1–9.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bénichou M, Gauthier JM, Girodet P, Hentges G, Ribière G, Vincent O (1971) Experiments in mixed integer linear programming. Math. Programming 1:76–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chvátal V (1997) Resolution search. Discrete Appl. Math. 73:81–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • COR@L (2005) Computational optimization research at Lehigh. Available at http://coral.ie.lehigh.edu/data-sets/mixed-integer-instances/.Google Scholar
  • Dilkina B, Gomes CP, Malitsky Y, Sabharwal A, Sellmann M (2009) Backdoors to combinatorial optimization: Feasibility and optimality. van Hoeve WJ, Hooker JN, eds. CPAIOR2009, Proc. 6th Internat. Conf. Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optim. Problems (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg), 56–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischetti M, Monaci M (2011) Backdoor branching. Günlük O, Woeginger GJ, eds. IPCO 2011, Proc. 15th Conf. Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optim. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg), 183–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hutter F, Hoos HH, Leyton-Brown K (2010) Automated configuration of mixed integer programming solvers. Lodi A, Milano M, Toth P, eds. CPAIOR2010, Proc. 7th Internat. Conf. Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optim. Problems (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg), 186–202.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karzan FK, Nemhauser GL, Savelsbergh MWP (2009) Information-based branching schemes for binary linear mixed integer problems. Math. Programming Comput. 1:249–293.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koch T, Achterberg T, Andersen E, Bastert O, Berthold T, Bixby RE, Danna E, et al. (2011) MIPLIB 2010 mixed integer programming library version 5. Math. Programming Comput. 3:103–163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Linderoth JT, Savelsbergh MWP (1999) A computational study of search strategies for mixed integer programming. INFORMS J. Comput. 11:173–187.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Patel J, Chinneck JW (2007) Active-constraint variable ordering for faster feasibility of mixed integer linear programs. Math. Programming 110:445–474.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pryor J, Chinneck JW (2011) Faster integer-feasibility in mixed-integer linear programs by branching to force change. Comput. Oper. Res. 38:1143–1152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams R, Gomes CP, Selman B (2003) Backdoors to typical case complexity. Gottlob G, Walsh T, eds. IJCAI-03, Proc. Eighteenth Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco), 1173–1178.Google Scholar
  • Wojtaszek DT, Chinneck JW (2010) Faster MIP solutions via new node selection rules. Comput. Oper. Res. 37:1544–1556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.