Regression Models Augmented with Direct Stochastic Gradient Estimators

References

• Ankenman B, Nelson BL, Staum J (2010) Stochastic kriging for simulation metamodeling. Oper. Res. 58(2):371–382.Link, Google Scholar
• Asmussen S, Glynn P (2007) Stochastic Simulation: Algorithms and Analysis (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barton RR, Meckesheimer M (2006) Metamodel-based simulation optimization. Henderson SG, Nelson BL, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Simulation, Chapter 18 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 535–574.Google Scholar
• Beckman RJ, Cook RD (1983) Outliers. Technometrics 25(2):119–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Box GEP, Draper NR (2007) Response Surfaces, Mixtures, and Ridge Analyses (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen X, Ankenman BE, Nelson BL (2013) Enhancing stochastic kriging metamodels with gradient estimators. Oper. Res. 61(2):512–528.Link, Google Scholar
• Fu MC (1990) Convergence of a stochastic approximation algorithm for the GI/G/1 queue using infinitesimal perturbation analysis. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 65(1):149–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fu MC (2006) Gradient estimation. Henderson SG, Nelson BL, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Simulation, Chapter 19 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 575–616.Google Scholar
• Fu MC (2008) What you should know about simulation and derivatives. Naval Res. Logist. 55(8):723–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glasserman P (1991) Gradient Estimation via Perturbation Analysis (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston).Google Scholar
• Glasserman P (2004) Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho YC, Cao XR (1991) Perturbation Analysis and Discrete Event Dynamic Systems (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho YC, Shi L, Dai L, Gong W-B (1992) Optimizing discrete event dynamic systems via the gradient surface method. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems 2(2):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleijnen JPC (2008) Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiments (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Kleijnen JPC, Sargent RG (2000) A methodology for the fitting and validation of metamodels in simulation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 120(1):14–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lauridsen S, Vitali R, Van Keulen F, Haftka RT, Madsen JI (2001) Response surface approximation using gradient information. Cheng G, Gu Y, Liu S, Wang Y, eds. Proc. 4th World Congress Structural Multidisciplinary Optim. (Liaoning Electronic Press, Dalian, China).Google Scholar
• L'Ecuyer P, Giroux N, Glynn PW (1994) Stochastic optimization by simulation: Numerical experiments with the M/M/1 queue in steady-state. Management Sci. 40(10):1245–1261.Link, Google Scholar
• Morris MD, Mitchell TJ, Ylvisaker D (1993) Bayesian design and analysis of computer experiments: Use of derivatives in surface prediction. Technometrics 35(3):243–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qu H, Fu MC (2012) On direct gradient enhanced simulation metamodels. Proc. 2012 Winter Simulation Conf. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., Piscataway, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rencher AC, Schaalje GB (2007) Linear Models in Statistics (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein RY, Shapiro A (1993) Discrete Event Systems: Sensitivity Analysis and Stochastic Optimization by the Score Function Method (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Suri R, Zazanis MA (1988) Perturbation analysis gives strongly consistent sensitivity estimates for the M/G/1 queue. Management Sci. 34(1):39–64.Link, Google Scholar
• Weisberg S (2005) Applied Linear Regression, 3rd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhigljavsky A, Dette H, Pepelyshev A (2010) A new approach to optimal design for linear models with correlated observations. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 105(491):1093–1103.Crossref, Google Scholar