Estimating Sensitivities of Portfolio Credit Risk Using Monte Carlo

References

• Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber J-M, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 9(3):203–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asmussen S, Glynn PW (2007) Stochastic Simulation: Algorithms and Analysis (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bassamboo A, Juneja S, Zeevi A (2008) Portfolio credit risk with extremal dependence: Asymptotic analysis and efficient simulation. Oper. Res. 56(3):593–606.Link, Google Scholar
• Bernis G, Gobet E, Kohatsu-Higa A (2003) Monte Carlo evaluation of Greeks for multidimensional barrier and lookback options. Math. Finance 13(1):99–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bock RD (1985) Multivariate Statistical Methods in Behavioral Research, 2nd ed. (Scientific Software International, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Broadie M, Glasserman P (1996) Estimating security price derivatives using simulation. Management Sci. 42(2):269–285.Link, Google Scholar
• Chan JH, Joshi MS (2013) Fast Monte Carlo Greeks for financial products with discontinuous pay-offs. Math. Finance 23(3):459–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen N, Glasserman P (2007) Malliavin Greeks without Malliavin calculus. Stochastic Processes Their Appl. 117(11):1689–1723.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Glasserman P (2008) Sensitivity estimates for portfolio credit derivatives using Monte Carlo. Finance Stochastics 12(4):507–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Credit-Suisse-Finanical-Products (1997) CreditRisk+: A credit risk management framework. Technical report, http://www.csfb.com/institutional/research/assets/creditrisk.pdf.Google Scholar
• Duffie D, Gârleanu N (2001) Risk and valuation of collateralized debt obligations. Financial Analysts J. 57(1):41–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffie D, Singleton KJ (1999) Modeling term structures of defaultable bonds 1999. Rev. Financial Stud. 12(4):687–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Durrett R (2005) Probability: Theory and Examples, 3rd ed. (Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA).Google Scholar
• Embrechts P, Lindskog F, McNeil A (2003) Modeling dependence with copulas and applications to risk management. Rachev ST, ed. Handbook of Heavy Tailed Distribution in Finance (Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam), 329–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey R, McNeil A (2003) Dependent defaults in models of portfolio credit risk. J. Risk 6(1):59–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fu MC (2008) What you should know about simulation and derivatives. Naval Res. Logist. 55(8):723–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fu MC, Hu JQ (1995) Sensitivity analysis for Monte Carlo simulation of option pricing. Probab. Engrg. Inform. Sci. 9(3):417–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fu MC, Hu JQ (1997) Conditional Monte Carlo: Gradient Estimation and Optimization Applications (Kluwer, Norwell, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fu MC, Hong LJ, Hu J-Q (2009) Conditional Monte Carlo estimation of quantile sensitivities. Management Sci. 55(12):2019–2027.Link, Google Scholar
• Giesecke K, Kakavand H, Mousavi M, Takada H (2010) Exact and efficient simulation of correlated defaults. SIAM J. Financial Math. 1(1):868–896.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glasserman P (1991) Gradient Estimation via Perturbation Analysis (Kluwer, Norwell, MA).Google Scholar
• Glasserman P (2004) Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glynn PW (1987) Likelihood ratio gradient estimation: An overview. Thesen A, Grant H, Kelton WD, eds. Proc. 19th Conf. Winter Simulation (WSC'87) (ACM, New York), 366–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupton GM, Finger CC, Bhatia M (1997) CreditMetrics®—Technical Document (J. P. Morgan & Co. New York).Google Scholar
• Heidergott B, Vázquez–Abad FJ, Pflug G, Yuan TF (2010) Gradient estimation for discrete-event systems by measure-valued differentiation. ACM Trans. Modeling Comput. Simulation 20(1):Article 5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho YC, Cao XR (1983) Perturbation analysis and optimization of queueing networks. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 40(4):559–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homescu C (2011) Adjoints and automatic (algorithmic) differentiation in computational finance. Working paper, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1828503.Google Scholar
• Hong LJ (2009) Estimating quantile sensitivities. Oper. Res. 57(1):118–130.Link, Google Scholar
• Hong LJ, Liu G (2009) Simulating sensitivities of conditional value at risk. Management Sci. 55(2):281–293.Link, Google Scholar
• Hong LJ, Liu G (2010) Pathwise estimation of probability sensitivities through terminating or steady-state simulations. Oper. Res. 58(2):357–370.Link, Google Scholar
• Joshi MS, Kainth DS (2004) Rapid computation of prices and deltas of nth to default swaps in the Li model. Quant. Finance 4(3):266–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kealhofer S, Bohn JR (2001) Portfolio Management of Default Risk (KMV, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• L'Ecuyer P (1991) An overview of derivative estimation. Proc. 23rd Conf. Winter Simulation (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 207–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li D (2000) On default correlation: A copula function approach. J. Fixed Income 9(4):43–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu G, Hong LJ (2011) Kernel estimation of the Greeks for options with discontinuous payoffs. Oper. Res. 59(1):96–108.Link, Google Scholar
• Mashal R, Zeevi A (2002) Beyond correlation: Extreme co-movements between financial assets. Working paper, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
• Merton R (1974) On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates. J. Finance 29(2):449–470.Google Scholar
• Pflug G (1988) Derivatives of probability measures-concepts and applications to the optimization of stochastic systems. Varaiya P, Kurzhanski AB, eds. Discrete Event Systems: Models and Applications, Lecture Notes Control Inform. Sci., Vol. 103 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 252–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein RY (1989) Sensitivity analysis and performance extrapolation for computer simulation models. Oper. Res. 37(1):72–81.Link, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein RY (1992) Sensitivity analysis of discrete event systems by the “push-out” method. Ann. Oper. Res. 39(1):229–250.Crossref, Google Scholar