Role Refinement in Access Control: Model and Analysis
Published Online:28 Jul 2014https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2014.0603
References
- (2006) Algorithmic construction of sets for k-restrictions. ACM Trans. Algorithms 2(2):153–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Managing data quality risk in accounting information systems. Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):453–473.Link, Google Scholar
- (2012) On the prevention of fraud and privacy exposure in process information flow. INFORMS J. Comput. 24(3):416–432.Link, Google Scholar
- (2002) Research commentary: Workflow management issues in e-business. Inform. Systems Res. 13(1):1–14.Link, Google Scholar
- (2001) Separation of duties for access control enforcement in workflow environments. IBM Systems J. 40(3):666–682.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) On the set multi-cover problem in geometric settings. Proc. 25th Annual Sympos. Computational Geometry (ACM, New York), 341–350.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1979) A greedy heuristic for the set-covering problem. Math. Oper. Res. 4(3):233–235.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) A cost-driven approach to role engineering. Proc. 2008 ACM Sympos. Appl. Comput. (ACM, New York), 2129–2136.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) A business-driven decomposition methodology for role mining. Comput. Security 31(7):844–855.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009a) A probabilistic bound on the basic role mining problem and its applications. Proc. 24th IFIP TC 11 Internat. Inform. Security Conf., Cyprus Greece.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009b) A formal framework to elicit roles with business meaning in RBAC systems. Proc. 14th ACM Sympos. Access Control Models Tech. (ACM, New York), 85–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Taming role mining complexity in RBAC. Comput. Security 29(5):548–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) A new role mining framework to elicit business roles and to mitigate enterprise risk. Decision Support Systems 50(4):715–731.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Separation of duties and IT security. Accessed July 1, 2014, http://www.csoonline.com/article/446017/separation-of-duties-and-it-security.Google Scholar
- (1995) Role-engineering. 1st ACM Workshop on Role-Based Access Control (ACM Press, New York), 4.Google Scholar
- (2010) Role explosion: Acknowledging the problem. Proc. 2010 Internat. Conf. Software Engrg. Res. Practice, Las Vegas, NV, 349–355.Google Scholar
- (2008) Fast exact and heuristic methods for role minimization problems. Proc. 13th ACM Sympos. Access Control Models Tech. (ACM, New York), 1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992) Role-based access control. 15th National Comput. Security Conf., Baltimore.Google Scholar
- (1999) A role-based access control model and reference implementation within a corporate intranet. ACM Trans. Inform. System Security 2(1):34–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Role-based access control (RBAC): Features and motivations. Proc. 11th Annual Comput. Security Appl. Conf., New Orleans, 241–248.Google Scholar
- (1993) An examination of federal and commercial access control policy needs. Proc. 16th NIST-NSA National Comput. Security Conf., Baltimore, 107–116.Google Scholar
- (2007) Role-Based Access Control, 2nd ed. (Artech House, Norwood, MA).Google Scholar
- (2001) Proposed NIST standard for role-based access control. ACM Trans. Inform. System Security 4(3):224–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) A class of probabilistic models for role engineering. Proc. 15th ACM Conf. Comput. Comm. Security (ACM, New York), 299–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) On the definition of role mining. Proc. 15th ACM Sympos. Access Control Models Tech. (ACM, New York), 35–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Role mining with probabilistic models. ACM Trans. Inform. System Security 15(4):Article 15.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) The role hierarchy mining problem: Discovery of optimal role hierarchies. Comput. Security Appl. Conf., 237–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1986) A fast approximation algorithm for the multicovering problem. Discrete Appl. Math. 15(1):35–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1992) The multicovering problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 62(3):323–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Weighted geometric set cover problems revisited. J. Computational Geometry 3(1):65–85.Google Scholar
- (1972) Reducibility among combinatorial problems. Miller RE, Thatcher JW, eds. Complexity Comput. Comput. (Plenum Press, New York), 85–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Role mining–revealing business roles for security administration using data mining technology. Proc. 8th ACM Sympos. Access Control Models Tech. (ACM, New York), 179–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Beyond separation of duty: An algebra for specifying high-level security policies. J. ACM 55(3):Article 12.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) On mutually exclusive roles and separation-of-duty. ACM Trans. Inform. System Security 10(2):Article 5.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Optimal Boolean matrix decomposition: Application to role engineering. Proc. 2008 IEEE 24th Internat. Conf. Data Engrg. (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 297–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Mining roles with semantic meanings. Proc. 13th ACM Sympos. Access Control Models Tech. (ACM, New York), 21–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Economic Analysis of role-based access control. Accessed July 1, 2014, http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/SNS/rbac/documents/20101219_RBAC2_Final_Report.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2000) Configuring role-based access control to enforce mandatory and discretionary access control policies. ACM Trans. Inform. System Security 3(2):85–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) How to streamline role-based access control. Accessed July 1, 2014, http://searchfinancialsecurity.techtarget.com/tip/How-to-streamline-role-based-access-control.Google Scholar
- (1987) Randomized rounding: A technique for provably good algorithms and algorithmic proofs. Combinatorica 7(4):365–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1974) Protection and the control of information sharing in multics. Comm. ACM 17(7):388–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) How to do discretionary access control using roles. Proc. Third ACM Workshop Role-Based Access Control (ACM, New York), 47–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2000) The NIST model for role-based access control: Towards a unified standard. Proc. Fifth ACM Workshop Role-Based Access Control (ACM, New York),47–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Role-based access control models. Computer 29(2):38–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Saviynt (2012) Information provided via letter from the CEO of Saviynt to the authors, June 4.Google Scholar
- (2000) Enforceable security policies. ACM Trans. Inform. System Security 3(1):30–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) A role-based access control policy verification framework for real-time systems. Proc. 10th IEEE Internat. Workshop Object-Oriented Real-Time Dependable Systems (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 13–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) StateMiner: An efficient similarity-based approach for optimal mining of role hierarchy. Proc. 15th ACM Sympos. Access Control Models Tech. (ACM, New York),55–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Security and privacy challenges in cloud computing environments. Security Privacy, IEEE 8(6):24–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) RoleMiner: Mining roles using subset enumeration. Proc. 13th ACM Conf. Comput. Comm. Security (ACM, New York), 144–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) The role mining problem: Finding a minimal descriptive set of roles. Proc. 12th ACM Sympos. Access Control Models Tech. (ACM, New York), 175–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) The role mining problem: A formal perspective. ACM Tran. Inform. System Security 13(3):Article 27.Google Scholar
- (2008) Migrating to optimal RBAC with minimal perturbation. Proc. 13th ACM Sympos. Access Control Models Tech. (ACM, New York), 11–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Approximation Algorithms (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).Google Scholar
- (2012) Algorithms for mining meaningful roles. Proc. 17th ACM Sympos. Access Control Models Tech. (ACM, New York), 57–66.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) A generalization of the weighted set covering problem. Naval Res. Logist. 52(2):142–149.Crossref, Google Scholar

