An Integer Programming Approach for Fault-Tolerant Connected Dominating Sets

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2014.0619

References

  • Ahn N, Park S (2014) An optimization algorithm for the minimum k-connected m-dominating set problem in wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Blum J, Ding M, Thaeler A, Cheng X (2005) Connected dominating set in sensor networks and manets. Du D-Z, Pardalos PM, eds. Handbook of Combinatorial Optimization, Volume 5 (Springer, New York), 329–369.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Buchanan A, Sung JS, Boginski V, Butenko S (2014) On connected dominating sets of restricted diameter. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 236(2):410–418.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Butenko S, Cheng X, Oliveira C, Pardalos PM (2004) A new heuristic for the minimum connected dominating set problem on ad hoc wireless networks. Butenko S, Murphey R, Pardalos PM, eds. Recent Developments in Cooperative Control and Optimization, Volume 3 (Springer, New York), 61–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen S, Ljubić I, Raghavan S (2010) The regenerator location problem. Networks 55(3):205–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cheng X, Huang X, Li D, Wu W, Du DZ (2003) A polynomial-time approximation scheme for the minimum-connected dominating set in ad hoc wireless networks. Networks 42(4):202–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christof T, Löbel A, Stoer M (1997) PORTA-polyhedron representation transformation algorithm. Accessed January 10, 2015, http://www.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/groups/comopt/software/PORTA/index.html.Google Scholar
  • Dai F, Wu J (2006) On constructing k-connected k-dominating set in wireless ad hoc and sensor networks. J. Parallel Distributed Comput. 66(7):947–958.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • do Forte V, Lucena A, Maculan N (2013) Formulations for the minimum 2-connected dominating set problem. Electronic Notes Discrete Math. 41:415–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Du DZ, Wan PJ (2013) Connected Dominating Set: Theory and Applications (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fan N, Watson JP (2012) Solving the connected dominating set problem and power dominating set problem by integer programming. Lin G, ed., Proc. 6th Internat. Conf., COCOA 2012, Banff, Alberta, Canada, 371–383.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fomin FV, Grandoni F, Kratsch D (2008) Solving connected dominating set faster than 2n. Algorithmica 52(2):153–166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fujie T (2003) An exact algorithm for the maximum leaf spanning tree problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 30(13):1931–1944.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fujie T (2004) The maximum-leaf spanning tree problem: Formulations and facets. Networks 43(4):212–223.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Füredi Z (1987) The number of maximal independent sets in connected graphs. J. Graph Theory 11(4):463–470.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabow HN (2006) Using expander graphs to find vertex connectivity. J. ACM 53(5):800–844.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gendron B, Lucena A, Salles da Cunha A, Simonetti L (2014) Benders decomposition, branch-and-cut, and hybrid algorithms for the minimum connected dominating set problem. INFORMS J. Comput. 26(4):645–657.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Grötschel M, Lovász L, Schrijver A (1981) The ellipsoid method and its consequences in combinatorial optimization. Combinatorica 1(2):169–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guha S, Khuller S (1998) Approximation algorithms for connected dominating sets. Algorithmica 20(4):374–387.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gurobi Optimization, Inc. (2013) Gurobi Optimizer Reference Manual, http://www.gurobi.com.Google Scholar
  • Gutwenger C, Mutzel P (2001) A linear time implementation of SPQR-trees. Marks J, ed., Proc. 8th Internat. Sympos., GD 2000, Colonial Williamsburg, VA, 77–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henzinger MR, Rao S, Gabow HN (2000) Computing vertex connectivity: New bounds from old techniques. J. Algorithms 34(2):222–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hopcroft JE, Tarjan RE (1973) Dividing a graph into triconnected components. SIAM J. Comput. 2(3):135–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hunt HB, Marathe MV, Radhakrishnan V, Ravi SS, Rosenkrantz DJ, Stearns RE (1998) NC-approximation schemes for NP-and PSPACE-hard problems for geometric graphs. J. Algorithms 26(2):238–274.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kanevsky A (1990) On the number of minimum size separating vertex sets in a graph and how to find all of them. Proc. First Ann. ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia), 411–421.Google Scholar
  • Kanevsky A, Ramachandran V (1991) Improved algorithms for graph four-connectivity. J. Comput. System Sci. 42(3):288–306.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khachian LG (1979) A polynomial algorithm in linear programming. Soviet Math. Doklady 20(1):191–194.Google Scholar
  • Kloks T, Kratsch D (1998) Listing all minimal separators of a graph. SIAM J. Comput. 27(3):605–613.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li Y, Wu Y, Ai C, Beyah R (2012) On the construction of k-connected m-dominating sets in wireless networks. J. Combinatorial Optim. 23(1):118–139.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lichtenstein D (1982) Planar formulae and their uses. SIAM J. Comput. 11(2):329–343.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lu HI, Ravi R (1998) Approximating maximum leaf spanning trees in almost linear time. J. Algorithms 29(1):132–141.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lucena A, Maculan N, Simonetti L (2010) Reformulations and solution algorithms for the maximum leaf spanning tree problem. Comput. Management Sci. 7(3):289–311.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Matula DW (1978) k-blocks and ultrablocks in graphs. J. Combin. Theory, Ser. B 24(1):1–13.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan M, Grout V (2008) Finding optimal solutions to backbone minimisation problems using mixed integer programming. Proc. 7th Internat. Network Conf. (INC 2008), Plymouth, UK, 53–64.Google Scholar
  • Neumann A (2011) Implementation of Schmidts algorithm for certifying triconnectivity testing. Master’s thesis, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Shang W, Wan P, Yao F, Hu X (2007) Algorithms for minimum m-connected k-tuple dominating set problem. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 381(1):241–247.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simonetti L, da Cunha AS, Lucena A (2011) The minimum connected dominating set problem: Formulation, valid inequalities and a branch-and-cut algorithm. Network Optim., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 6701 (Springer, New York),162–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tarjan RE (1972) Depth-first search and linear graph algorithms. SIAM J. Comput. 1(2):146–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thai MT, Zhang N, Tiwari R, Xu X (2007) On approximation algorithms of k-connected m-dominating sets in disk graphs. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 385(1–3):49–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weisstein EW (2013) Perrin sequence. Math World—A Wolfram Web Resource. Accessed January 10, 2015, http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Perrin.Sequence.html.Google Scholar
  • Wu Y, Li Y (2008) Construction algorithms for k-connected m-dominating sets in wireless sensor networks. Proc. 9th ACM Internat. Sympos. Mobile Ad Hoc Networking Comput., Hong Kong, 83–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yuan D (2005) Energy-efficient broadcasting in wireless ad hoc networks: Performance benchmarking and distributed algorithms based on network connectivity characterization. Proc. 8th ACM Internat. Sympos. Modeling, Anal. Simulation Wireless Mobile Systems, Montreal, 28–35.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang Z, Gao X, Wu W, Du D-Z (2009) A PTAS for minimum connected dominating set in 3-dimensional wireless sensor networks. J. Global Optim. 45(3):451–458.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou J, Zhang Z, Wu W, Xing K (2014) A greedy algorithm for the fault-tolerant connected dominating set in a general graph. J. Combinatorial Optim. 28(1):310–319.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.