Automated Multilateral Negotiation on Multiple Issues with Private Information

References

• Aknine S, Pinson S, Shakun MF (2004) An extended multi-agent negotiation protocol. Autonomous Agents Multi-Agent Systems 8(1):5–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bauschke H, Borwein J (1996) On projection algorithms for solving convex feasibility problems. SIAM Rev. 38(3):367–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Binmore K (1985) Bargaining and coalitions. Roth AE, ed. Game-Theoretic Models of Bargaining (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 269–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyd S, Vandenberghe L (2004) Convex Optimization (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buffett S, Spencer B (2005) Learning opponents’ preferences in multi-object automated negotiation. Seventh Internat. Conf. Electronic Commerce (ICEC’05), Xi’an, China.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chalamish M, Kraus S (2012) Automed: An automated mediator for multi-issue bilateral negotiations. Autonomous Agents Multi-Agent Systems 24(3):536–564.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chari K, Agrawal M (2007) Multi-issue automated negotiations using agents. INFORMS J. Comput. 19(4):588–595.Link, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee K, Samuelson W (1983) Bargaining under incomplete information. Oper. Res. 31(5):835–851.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen L, Pu P (2004) Survey of preference elicitation methods. Technical report IC/200467, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne.Google Scholar
• Cheney W, Goldstein A (1959) Proximity maps for convex sets. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 10(3):448–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Combettes PL (1997) Hilbertian convex feasibility problem: Convergence of projection methods. Appl. Math. Optim. 35(3):311–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Endriss U (2006) Monotonic concession protocols for multilateral negotiation. Proc. Fifth Internat. Joint Conf. Autonomous Agents Multiagent Systems, AAMAS ’06, Hakodate, Hokkaido, Japan, 392–399.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fatima S, Wooldridge MJ, Jennings NR (2004) An agenda-based framework for multi-issue negotiation. Artif. Intell. 152(1):1–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fatima S, Wooldridge M, Jennings N (2006) Multi-issue negotiation with deadlines. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 27(1):381–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant M, Boyd S (2015) CVX: MATLAB software for disciplined convex programming, version 2.1. Accessed March 31, 2016, http://cvxr.com/cvx.Google Scholar
• Hanson AJ (1988) Hyperquadrics: Smoothly deformable shapes with convex polyhedral bounds. Comput. Vision, Graphics, Image Processing 44(2):191–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harsanyi JC, Selten R (1972) A generalized Nash solution for two-person bargaining games with incomplete information. Management Sci. 18(5, Part 2):80–106.Link, Google Scholar
• Heiskanen P, Ehtamo H, Hamalainen RP (2001) Constraint proposal method for computing Pareto solutions in multi-party negotiations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 133(1):44–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ito T, Hattori H, Klein M (2007) Multi-issue negotiation protocol for agents: Exploring nonlinear utility spaces. Proc. 20th Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’07), Hyderabad, India, 1347–1352.Google Scholar
• Kalai E (1977) Proportional solutions to bargaining situations: Intertemporal utility comparisons. Econometrica 45(7):1623–1630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalai E, Smorodinsky M (1975) Other solutions to Nash’s bargaining problem. Econometrica 43(3):513–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein M, Faratin P, Sayama H, Bar-Yam Y (2003) Negotiating complex contracts. Group Decision Negotiation 12(2):111–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lai G, Sycara K (2009) A generic framework for automated multi-attribute negotiation. Group Decision Negotation 18(2):169–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lange A, Löschel A, Vogt C, Ziegler A (2010) On the self-interested use of equity in international climate negotiations. Eur. Econom. Rev. 54(3):359–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lensberg T (1988) Stability and the Nash solution. J. Econom. Theory 45(2):330–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li C, Tesauro G (2003) A strategic decision model for multi-attribute bilateral negotiation with alternating offers. Nisan N, ed. Proc. ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM Press, New York), 208–209.Google Scholar
• Lin R, Kraus S, Wilkenfeld J, Barry J (2008) Negotiating with bounded rational agents in environments with incomplete information using an automated agent. Art. Intell. 172(6–7): 823–851.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lopes de Lima M, Camponogara E, Limon Marruedo D, Munoz de la Pena D (2015) Distributed satisficing MPC. Control Systems Tech., IEEE Trans. 23(1):305–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerson RB (1979) Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem. Econometrica 47(1):61–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nash J (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18(2):155–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE (1977) Individual rationality and Nash’s solution to the bargaining problem. Math. Oper. Res. 2(1):64–65.Link, Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A (1982) Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50(1):97–109.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shakun MF (2005) Multi-bilateral multi-issue e-negotiation in e-commerce with a tit-for-tat computer agent. Group Decision Negotiation 14(5):383–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simon HA (1956) Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psych. Rev. 63(2):129–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stirling WC (2003) Satisficing Games and Decision Making: With Applications to Engineering and Computer Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stirling WC (2005) Social utility functions-part i: Theory. Systems, Man, Cybernetics, Part C: Appl. Rev., IEEE Trans. 35(4):522–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sycara K, Dai T (2010) Agent reasoning in negotiation. Kilgour D, Eden C, eds. Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation (Springer, New York), 437–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu M, de Weerdt MM, Poutre HL (2009) Efficient methods for multi-agent multi-issue negotiation: Allocating resources. Yang JJ, Yokoo M, Ito T, Jin Z, Scerri P, eds. Proc. PRIMA, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5925 (Springer, New York), 97–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeng DD (2001) Managing flexibility for inter-organizational electronic commerce. Electronic Commerce Res. 1(1–2):33–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zheng R, Chakraborty N, Dai T, Sycara K (2013a) Multiagent negotiation on multiple issues with incomplete information. Proc. Twelfth Internat. Conf. Autonomous Agents Multiagent Systems, Saint Paul, MN, 1279–1280.Google Scholar
• Zheng R, Chakraborty N, Dai T, Sycara K, Lewis M (2013b) Automated bilateral multi-issue negotiation with no information about opponent. Proc. Hawaii Internat. Conf. Systems Sci., Wailea, Maui, HI, 520–527.Google Scholar