Efficient VaR and CVaR Measurement via Stochastic Kriging

References

• Ankenman B, Nelson BL, Staum J (2010) Stochastic kriging for simulation metamodeling. Oper. Res. 58(2):371–382.Link, Google Scholar
• Asmussen S, Glynn PW (2007) Stochastic Simulation (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Bekki J, Chen X, Batur D (2014) Steady-state quantile parameter estimation: An empirical comparison of stochastic kriging and quantile regression. Tolk A, Diallo SY, Ryzhov IO, Yilmaz L, Buckley S, Miller JA, eds. Proc. 2014 Winter Simulation Conf. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., Washington, DC), 3880–3891.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butner K (2012) Combating risk with predictive intelligence. Technical report, IBM Global Services, Somers, NY.Google Scholar
• Chen EJ (2009) Metamodels for estimating quantiles of systems with one controllable parameter. Simulation 85(5):307–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen X, Kim K (2013) Building metamodels for quantile-based measures using sectioning. Pasupathy R, Kim SH, Tolk A, Hill R, Kuhl ME, eds. Proc. 2013 Winter Simulation Conf. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., Washington, DC), 521–532.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen X, Kim K (2014) Stochastic kriging with biased sample estimates. ACM Trans. Modeling Comput. Simulation 24:8/1–8/23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen X, Ankenman BE, Nelson BL (2012) The effects of common random numbers on stochastic kriging metamodels. ACM Trans. Modeling Comput. Simulation 22:7/1–7/20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen X, Ankenman BE, Nelson BL (2013) Enhancing stochastic kriging metamodels with gradient estimators. Oper. Res. 61(2):512–528.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Yu J (2015) Optimal jackknife for unit root models. Statist. Probab. Lett. 99:135–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chu F, Nakayama MK (2012) Confidence intervals for quantiles when applying variance-reduction techniques. ACM Trans. Modeling Comput. Simulation 22:10/1–10/25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dabo-Niang S, Thiam B (2010) Robust quantile estimation and prediction for spatial processes. Statist. Probab. Lett. 80(17–18):1447–1458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• David HA, Nagaraja HN (2003) Order Statistics, 3rd ed. (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellino G, Kleijnen JPC, Meloni C (2012) Robust optimization in simulation: Taguchi and Krige combined. INFORMS J. Comput. 24(3):471–484.Link, Google Scholar
• Efron B (1982) The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans (SIAM, Philadelphia).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Efron B, Stein C (1981) The jackknife estimate of variance. Ann. Statist. 9(3):586–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An Introduction to the Bootstrap (Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fu MC (2006) Graduent estimation. Henderson SG, Nelson BL, eds. Simulation, Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 13 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 575–616.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordy MB, Juneja S (2010) Nested simulation in portfolio risk measurement. Management Sci. 56(10):1833–1848.Link, Google Scholar
• Gorissen D, Crombecq K, Hendrickx W, Dhaene T (2007) Adaptive distributed metamodeling. Kuhl ME, Steiger NM, Armstrong FB, Joines JA, eds. Proc. 7th Internat. Conf. High Performance Comput. Computational Sci. (VECPAR 2006) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), 579–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hernandez AF, Grover MA (2013) Error estimation properties of Gaussian process models in stochastic simulations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 228(1):131–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong LJ (2009) Estimating quantile sensitivities. Oper. Res. 57(1):118–130.Link, Google Scholar
• Hong LJ, Liu G (2009) Simulating sensitivities of conditional value at risk. Management Sci. 55(2):281–293.Link, Google Scholar
• Hsu JC, Nelson BL (1990) Control variates for quantile estimation. Management Sci. 36(7):835–851.Link, Google Scholar
• Kiefer J (1967) On Bahadur’s representation of sample quantiles. Ann. Math. Statist. 38(5):1323–1342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleijnen JPC (2005) Supply chain simulation tools and techniques: A survey. Internat. J. Simulation Process Model. 1(1–2):82–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleijnen JPC (2015) Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiments, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York), 579–588.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ko B, Russo RP, Shyamalkumar ND (2009) A note on nonparametric estimation of the CTE. Astin Bull. 39(2):717–734.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koenker R (2005) Quantile Regression (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• L’Ecuyer P (1990) A unified view of the IPA, SF, and LR gradient estimation techniques. Management Sci. 36(11):1364–1383.Link, Google Scholar
• Li S, Peng J (2012) A new approach to risk comparison via uncertain measure. Indust. Engrg. Management Systems 11(2):176–182.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehdad E, Kleijnen JPC (2015) Classic Kriging versus Kriging with bootstrapping or conditional simulation: Classic Kriging’s robust confidence intervals and optimization. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 66(11):1804–1814.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nakayama MK (2014) Confidence intervals for quantiles using sectioning when applying variance-reduction techniques. ACM Trans. Modeling Comput. Simulation 24:19/1–19/21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nance RE, Sargent RG (2002) Perspectives on the evolution of simulation. Oper. Res. 50(1):161–172.Link, Google Scholar
• Phillips PCB, Yu J (2005) Jackknifing bond option prices. Rev. Financial Stud. 18(2):707–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Picheny V, Ginsbourger D, Richet Y, Caplin G (2013) Quantile-based optimization of noisy computer experiments with tunable precision (with comments and rejoinder). Technometrics 55(1):2–36.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ressler RL, Lewis PAW (1990) Variance reduction for quantile estimates in simulations via nonlinear controls. Comm. Statist.—Simulation Comput. 19(3):1045–1077.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rüschendorf L (2013) Mathematical Risk Analysis (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sacks J, Welch WJ, Mitchell TJ, Wynn HP (1989) Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statist. Sci. 4(4):409–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santner TJ, Williams BJ, Notz WI (2003) The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmitt AJ, Singh M (2012) A quantitative analysis of disruption risk in a multi-echelon supply chain. Internat. J. Production Econom. 139(1):22–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seila AF (1982) A batching approach to quantile estimation in regenerative simulations. Management Sci. 28(5):573–581.Link, Google Scholar
• Serfling RJ (1980) Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics (Wiley, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shao J (1993) Differentiability of statistical functionals and consistency of the jackknife. Ann. Statist. 21(1):61–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shao J, Tu D (1995) The Jackknife and Bootstrap (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shao J, Wu CFJ (1989) A general theory for jackknife variance estimation. Ann. Statist. 17(3):1176–1197.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simamora E, Subanar, Kartiko SH (2015) A comparison study of parametric and semiparametric bootstrapping in deterministic simulation. Internat. J. Appl. Math. Statist. 53(5):172–181.Google Scholar
• Tayur S, Ganeshan R, Magazine M (1998) Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
• Trindade AA, Uryasev S, Shapiro A, Zrazhevsky G (2007) Financial prediction with constrianed tail risk. J. Banking Finance 31(11):3524–3538.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang F, Ankenman BE, Nelson BL (2008) Estimating cycle time percentile curves for manufacturing systems via simulation. INFORMS J. Comput. 20(4):628–643.Link, Google Scholar
• Yin J, Ng SH, Ng KM (2009) A study on the effects of parameter estimation on kriging model’s prediction error in stochastic simulations. Rossetti MD, Hill RR, Johansson B, Dunkin A, Ingalls RG, eds. Proc. 2009 Winter Simulation Conf. (IEEE, Austin, TX), 674–685.Crossref, Google Scholar