Active Learning with Multiple Localized Regression Models

References

• Abe N, Mamitsuka H (1998) Query learning strategies using boosting and bagging. Proc. ICML ’98 (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco), 1–9.Google Scholar
• Agarwal D, Merugu S (2007) Predictive discrete latent factor models for large scale dyadic data. Proc. 13th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York), 26–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumann T, Germond AJ (1993) Application of the Kohonen network to short-term load forecasting. Proc. ANNPS ’93 (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 407–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bilgic M, Bennett PN (2012) Active query selection for learning rankers. Proc. 35th Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. Res. Development Inform. Retrieval (ACM, New York), 1033–1034.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (1984) Classification and Regression Trees (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
• Burbidge R, Rowland JJ, King RD (2007) Active learning for regression based on query by committee. Proc. Intelligent Data Engrg. Automated Learn. (IDEAL) (Springer, New York), 209–218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohn D, Atlas L, Ladner R (1994) Improving generalization with active learning. Machine Learn. 15(2):201–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohn D, Ghahramani Z, Jordan M (1996) Active learning with statistical models. J. Artificial Intelligence Res. 4:129–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deodhar M, Ghosh J (2008) Simultaneous co-segmentation and predictive modeling for large, temporal marketing data. Proc. Data Mining Design Marketing, ICDM 2008 Workshop (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 806–815.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deodhar M, Ghosh J (2010) SCOAL: A framework for simultaneous co-clustering and learning from complex data. J. ACM Trans. Knowledge Discovery from Data 4(3):Article no. 10.Google Scholar
• Djukanovic M, Babic B, Sobajic D, Pao Y (1993) Unsupervised/supervised learning concept for 24-hour load forecasting. IEE Proc.-Generation, Transmission Distribution 140(4):311–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fedorov V (1972) Theory of Optimal Experiments (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Fukumizu K (2000) Statistical active learning in multilayer perceptrons. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 11(1):17–26.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gill P, Murray W, Wright M (1981) Practical Optimization (Academic Press, London).Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2001) The Elements of Statistical Learning (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang Z (2007) Selectively acquiring ratings for product recommendation. Proc. 9th Internat. Conf. Electronic Commerce (ICEC ’07) (ACM, New York), 379–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanamori T, Shimodaira H (2003) Active learning algorithm using the maximum weighted log-likelihood estimator. J. Statist. Planning Inference 116(1):149–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiefer J (1959) Optimum experimental designs. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. 21(2):272–304.Google Scholar
• Kim B, Sullivan M (1998) The effect of parent brand experience on line extension trial and repeat purchase. Marketing Lett. 9(2):181–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohavi R, Longbotham R, Sommerfield D, Henne1 R (2009) Controlled experiments on the web: Survey and practical guide. Data Mining Knowledge Discovery 18(1):140–181.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koren Y (2008) Factorization meets the neighborhood: A multifaceted collaborative filtering model. Proc. 14th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York), 426–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis DD, Gale WA (1994) A sequential algorithm for training text classifiers. Croft BW, van Rijsbergen CJ, eds. Proc. SIGIR ’94 (Springer, London), 3–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu TY (2011) Learning to Rank for Information Retrieval (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Long B, Bian J, Chapelle O, Zhang Y, Inagaki Y, Chang Y (2015) Active learning for ranking through expected loss optimization. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 27(5):1180–1191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melville P, Saar-Tsechansky M, Provost F, Mooney R (2005) An expected utility approach to active feature-value acquisition. Proc. ICDM ’05 (IEEE Computer Society, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menon AK, Jian X, Kim J, Vaidya J, Ohno-Machado L (2013) Detecting inappropriate access to electronic health records using collaborative filtering. Machine Learn. 95(1):87–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quinlan JR (1992) Learning with continuous classes. Proc. AI ’92 (World Scientific, Singapore), 343–348.Google Scholar
• RayChaudhuri T, Hamey LGC (1995) Minimisation of data collection by active learning. Proc. ICNN ’95 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ),1338–1341.Google Scholar
• Roy N, McCallum AK (2001) Toward optimal active learning through sampling estimation of error reduction. Proc. ICML ’01 (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco), 441–448.Google Scholar
• Rubens N, Sugiyama M (2007) Influence-based collaborative active learning. Proc. RecSys ’07 (ACM, New York), 145–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saar-Tsechansky M, Provost F (2004) Active sampling for class probability estimation and ranking. Machine Learn. 54(2):153–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saar-Tsechansky M, Melville P, Provost F (2009) Active feature-value acquisition. Management Sci. 55(4):664–684.Link, Google Scholar
• Seetharaman PB, Ainslie A, Chintagunta PK (1999) Investigating household state dependence effects across categories. J. Marketing Res. 36(4):488–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Settles B (2012) Active Learning (Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning) (Morgan and Claypool Publishers, San Rafael, CA).Google Scholar
• Seung HS, Opper M, Smopolinsky H (1992) Query by committee. Proc. COLT ’92 (ACM, New York), 287–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sugiyama M (2006) Active learning in approximately linear regression based on conditional expectation of generalization error. J. Machine Learn. Res. 7:141–166.Google Scholar
• Sugiyama M, Nakajima S (2009) Pool-based active learning in approximate linear regression. Machine Learn. 75(3):249–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sugiyama M, Rubens N (2008) Active learning with model selection in linear regression. Proc. SIAM Internat. Conf. Data Mining (SIAM, Philadelphia), 518–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Witten IH (1997) Inducing model trees for continuous classes. van Someren M, Widmer G, eds. Proc. ECML ’97, Prague.Google Scholar
• Wedel M, Steenkamp J (1991) A clusterwise regression method for simultaneous fuzzy market structuring and benefit segmentation. J. Marketing Res. 28(4):385–396.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiens D (2000) Robust weights and designs for biased regression models: Least squares and generalized m-estimation. J. Statist. Planning Inference 83(2):395–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Chen T (2002) An active learning framework for content-based information retrieval. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 4(2):260–268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zheng Z, Padmanabhan B (2006) Selectively acquiring customer information: A new data acquisition problem and an active learning-based solution. Management Sci. 52(5):697–712.Link, Google Scholar