Modelling Human Decision Behaviour with Preference Learning

References

• Agarwal M, Hanmandlu M, Biswas KK (2013) A probabilistic and decision attitude aggregation operator for intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Internat. J. Intelligent Systems 25(8):806–839.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aggarwal M (2015a) Compensative weighted averaging aggregation operators. Appl. Soft Comput. 28:368–378.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aggarwal M (2015b) Generalized compensative weighted averaging aggregation operators. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 87:81–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aggarwal M (2018) Attitudinal Choquet integrals and applications in decision making. Internat. J. Intelligent Systems 33(4):879–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alonso S, Cabrerizo FJ, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2009) Group decision making with incomplete fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Internat. J. Intelligent Systems 24(2):201–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bahamonde A, Bayon GF, Diez J, Quevedo JR, Luaces O, del Coz JJ, Alonso J, Goyache F (2004) Feature subset selection for learning preferences: A case study. Proc. 21st Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (The International Machine Learning Society, Banff, Canada), 49–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belles-Sampera J, Merigo JM, Guillen M, Santolino M (2014) Indicators for the characterization of discrete choquet integrals. Inform. Sci. 267(14):201–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berrah L, Mauris G, Montmain J (2008) Monitoring the improvement of an overall industrial performance based on a Choquet integral aggregation. Omega 36(3):340–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brochu E, de Freitas N, Ghosh A (2007) Active preference learning with discrete choice data. Platt JC, Koller D, Singer Y, Roweis ST, eds. Proc. 21st Annual Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (NIPS, La Jolla, CA), 409–416.Google Scholar
• Bustince H, Fernandez J, Mesiar R (2013) Aggregation functions in theory and in practise. Proc. 7th Internat. Summer School Aggregation Operators Public Univ. Navarra (Springer, Pamplona, Spain).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang KH, Wen TC (2010) A novel efficient approach for DFMEA combining 2-tuple and OWA operator. Expert Systems Appl. 37(3):2362–2370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choquet G (1954) Theory of capacities. Annales de l'Institut Fourier 5: 131–295. Available at http://www.numdam.org/item/AIF_1954__5__131_0.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daniels H, Kamp B (1999) Applications of MLP networks to bond rating and house pricing. Neural Comput. Appl. 8(3):226–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demsar J (2006) Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. J. Machine Learn. Res. 7(1):1–30.Google Scholar
• Doyle J (2004) Prospects for preferences. Comput. Intelligence 20(4):111–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyckhoff H, Pedrycz W (1984) Generalized means as a model of compensation connectives. Fuzzy Sets Systems 14(2):143–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fallah Tehrani A, Hüllermeier E (2013) Ordinal Choquistic regression. Proc. EUSFLAT Conf. (Atlantis Press, Milan).Google Scholar
• Fallah Tehrani A, Cheng W, Dembczyński K, Hüllermeier E (2011) Learning monotone nonlinear models using the Choquet integral. Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6913 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 414–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiechter C-N, Rogers S (2000) Learning subjective functions with large margins. Langley P, ed. Proc. 17th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco), 287–294.Google Scholar
• Fragnelli V, Moretti S (2008) A game theoretical approach to the classification problem in gene expression data analysis. Comput. Math. Appl. 55(5):950–959.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fürnkranz J, Hüllermeier E (2005) Preference learning. Künstliche Intelligenz 19(1):60–61.Google Scholar
• Fürnkranz J, Hüllermeier E (2010) Preference Learning (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg).Google Scholar
• Fürnkranz J, Hüllermeier E, Vanderlooy S (2009) Binary decomposition methods for multipartite ranking. Buntine W, Grobelnik M, Mladenic D, Shawe-Taylor J, eds. Proc. Eur. Conf. Machine Learn. Principles Practice Knowledge Discovery Databases (Springer, Bled, Slovenia), 359–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grabisch M (1995) Fuzzy integral in multicriteria decision making. Fuzzy Sets Systems 69(3):279–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grabisch M (1996) The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 89(3):445–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grabisch M (2000) Fuzzy integral for classification and feature extraction. Grabisch M, Murofushi, T, Sugeno M, eds. Fuzzy Measures and Integrals: Theory and Applications, Studies in fuzziness and soft computing, vol. 40 (Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany), 415–434.Google Scholar
• Grabisch M, Duchene J, Lino F, Perny P (2002) Subjective evaluation of discomfort in sitting position. Fuzzy Optim. Decision Making 1(3):287–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grabisch M, Marichal J, Mesiar R, Pap E (2009) Aggregation Functions, 1st ed. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications, book 127 (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grabisch M, Marichal JL, Mesiar R, Pap E (2011) Aggregation functions: Means. Inform. Sci. 181(1):1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herbrich R, Graepel T, Obermayer K (2000) Advances in Large Margin Classifiers, Large Margin Rank Boundaries for Ordinal Regression (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 115–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Houlsby N, Miguel Hernandez-Lobato J, Huszar F, Ghahramani Z (2012) Collaborative Gaussian processes for prefernce learning. Proc. Annual Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (NIPS), Lake Tahoe, NV, 2105–2113.Google Scholar
• Krishnapuram R, Lee J (1992) Fuzzy-connective-based hierarchical aggregation networks for decision making. Fuzzy Sets Systems 46(1):11–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liginlal D, Ow TT (2005) On policy capturing with fuzzy measures. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 167(2):461–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu JW, Cheng CH, Chen YH, Chen TL (2010) OWA rough set model for forecasting the revenues growth rate of the electronic industry. Expert Systems Appl. 37(1):610–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luhandjula MK (1982) Compensatory operators in fuzzy linear programming with multiple objectives. Fuzzy Sets Systems 8(3):245–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marichal JL (2002) Aggregation of interacting criteria by means of the discrete Choquet integral. Calvo T, Mayor G, Mesiar R, eds. Aggregation Operators: New Trends and Applications, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. 97 (Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany), 224–244.Google Scholar
• Marichal JL (2007) K-intolerant capacities and Choquet integrals. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 177(3):1453–1468.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merigo JM (2010) Fuzzy decision making with immediate probabilities. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 58(4):651–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merigo JM (2011) Fuzzy multi-person decision making with fuzzy probabilistic aggregation operators. Internat. J. Fuzzy Systems 13(3):163–174.Google Scholar
• Merigo JM (2012) Probabilities with OWA operators. Expert Systems Appl. 39(13):11456–11467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merigo JM, Casanovas M (2010) The fuzzy generalized OWA operator and its application in strategic decision making. Cybernetics Systems 41(5):359–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merigo JM, Gil-Lafuente AM (2009) The induced generalized OWA operator. Inform. Sci. 179(6):729–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merigo JM, Gil-Lafuente AM (2011) Decision-making in sport management based on OWA operator. Expert Systems Appl. 38(8):10408–10413.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merigo JM, Casanovas M, Engemann KJ (2012) Group decision making with generalized and probabilistic aggregation operators. Internat. J. Innovative Comput. Inform. Control 8(7A):4823–4835.Google Scholar
• Mesiar R, Mesiarová-Zemánková A, Ahmad K (2011) Discrete Choquet integral and some of its symmetric extensions. Fuzzy Sets Systems 184(1):148–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murofushi T, Soneda S (1993) Techniques for reading fuzzy measures (III): Interaction index. Proc. 9th Fuzzy Systems Sympos., Sapporo, Japan, 693–696.Google Scholar
• Nasiri M, Berlik S (2009) Modeling of polyester dyeing using an evolutionary fuzzy system. Paulo Carvalho J, Dubois D, Kaymak U, Costa Sousa JM, eds. Proc. Joint Internat. Fuzzy Systems Assoc. World Congress Eur. Soc. Fuzzy Logic Tech. Conf. (IFSA/EUSFLAT, Lisbon, Portugal), 1246–1251.Google Scholar
• Nather W, Walder K (2007) Applying fuzzy measures for considering interaction effects in root dispersal models. Fuzzy Sets Systems 158(5):572–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ozbey O, Karwan MH (2014) An interactive approach for multicriteria decision making using a Tchebycheff utility function approximation. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. 21(3–4):153–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pahikkala T, Waegeman W, Tsivtsivadze E, Salakoski T, De Baets B (2010) Learning intransitive reciprocal relations with kernel methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 206(3):676–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pelaez JI, Dona JM, Gomez-Ruiz JA (2007) Analysis of OWA operators in decision making for modelling the majority concept. Appl. Math. Comput. 186(2):1263–1275.Google Scholar
• Saito K, Watanabe Y, Hashimoto H, Uchiyama A (2007) An application of fuzzy integral model for the clinical diagnosis. J. Biomed. Fuzzy Systems Assoc. 1(1):17–24.Google Scholar
• Su ZX, Xia G-P, Chen M-Y, Wang L (2012) Induced generalized intuitionistic fuzzy OWA operator for multi-attribute group decision making. Expert Systems Appl. 39(2):1902–1910.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sugeno M (1974) Theory of Fuzzy Integrals and its Application. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo.Google Scholar
• Tan C, Chen X (2010) Induced Choquet ordered averaging operator and its application in group decision making. Internat. J. Intelligent Systems 25(1):59–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tan C, Chen X (2011) Induced intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral operator for multicriteria decision making. Internat. J. Intelligent Systems 26(7):659–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Torra V (1997) The weighted OWA operator. Internat. J. Intelligent Systems 12(2):153–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Torra V, Narukawa Y (2008) The h-index and the number of citations: Two fuzzy integrals. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems 16(3):795–797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang Y-M, Parkan C (2007) A preemptive goal programming method for aggregating OWA operator weights in group decision making. Inform. Sci. 177(8):1867–1877.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wei GW (2008) Induced intuitionistic fuzzy ordered weighted averaging operator and its application to multiple attribute group decision making. Wang G, Li T, Grzymala-Busse JW, Miao D, Skowron A, Yao Y, eds. Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5009 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 124–131.Google Scholar
• Xu Z (2007) Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems 15(6):1179–1187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu Z (2010) Choquet integrals of weighted intuitionistic fuzzy information. Inform. Sci. 180(5):726–736.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu ZS, Da QL (2002) The ordered weighted geometric averaging operators. Internat. J. Intelligent Systems 17(7):709–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernetics 18(1):183–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yager RR (1992) On a semantics for neural networks based on fuzzy quantifiers. Internat. J. Intelligent Systems 7(8):765–786.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yager RR (1995) Fuzzy aggregation of modular neural networks with ordered weighted averaging operators. Internat. J. Approximation Reasoning 13(4):359–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yager RR (2004a) Choquet aggregation using order inducing variables. Internat. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowledge Based Systems 12(1):69–88.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yager RR (2004b) Generalized OWA aggregation operators. Fuzzy Optim. Decision Making 3(1):93–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yager RR (2008) Using trapezoids for representing granular objects: Applications to learning and OWA aggregation. Inform. Sci. 178(2):363–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yager RR, Filev DP (1999) Induced ordered weighted averaging operators. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernetics 29(2):141–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yager RR, Kacprzyk J (1997) The Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators: Theory and Applications (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yager RR, Zadeh LA (1992) An Introduction to Fuzzy Logic Applications in Intelligent Systems (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Nowell, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yager RR, Engemann KJ, Filev DP (1995) On the concept of immediate probabilities. Internat. J. Intelligent Systems 10(4):373–397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zimmermann HJ, Zysno P (1980) Latent connectives in human decision making. Fuzzy Sets Systems 4(1):37–51.Crossref, Google Scholar