A Dynamic Programming Approach to Power Consumption Minimization in Gunbarrel Natural Gas Networks with Nonidentical Compressor Units

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2018.0833

References

  • Aggarwal A, Klawe MM, Moran S, Shor PW, Wilber RE (1987) Geometric applications of a matrix-searching algorithm. Algorithmica 2(1–4):195–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borraz-Sánchez C, Haugland D (2011) Minimizing fuel cost in gas transmission networks by dynamic programming and adaptive discretization. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 61(2):364–372.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borraz-Sánchez C, Ríos-Mercado RZ (2005) A hybrid meta-heuristic approach for natural gas pipeline network optimization. Blesa MJ, Blum C, Roli A, Sampels M, eds. Hybrid Metaheuristics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3636 (Springer, Berlin), 54–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borraz-Sánchez C, Ríos-Mercado RZ (2009) Improving the operation of pipeline systems on cyclic structures by tabu search. Comput. Chemical Engrg. 33(1):58–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carter RG (1998) Pipeline optimization: Dynamic programming after 30 years. Proc. 30th PSIG Annual Meeting (Pipeline Simulation Interest Group, Denver).Google Scholar
  • Chebouba A, Yalaoui F, Smati A, Amodeo L, Younsi K, Tairi A (2009) Optimization of natural gas pipeline transportation using ant colony optimization. Comput. Oper. Res. 36(6):1916–1923.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cobos-Zaleta D, Ríos-Mercado RZ (2002) A minlp model for minimizing fuel consumption on natural gas pipeline networks. Pradenas L, ed. Proc. 11th Latin-Ibero-Amer. Conf. Oper. Res. (Springer, New York), 90–94.Google Scholar
  • Conti J, Holtberg P, Beamon J, Napolitano S, Schaal A (2014) Annual energy outlook 2014 with projections to 2040. Report EIA-0383, U.S. Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Dantzig GB (1963) Linear Programming and Extensions (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Wolf D, Smeers Y (2000) The gas transmission problem solved by an extension of the simplex algorithm. Management Sci. 46(11):1454–1465.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Deng T (2015) Minimization of power usage in a compressor station with multiple compressors. J. Energy Engrg. 142(4):04015048.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Domschke P, Geissler B, Kolb O, Lang J, Martin A, Morsi A (2011) Combination of nonlinear and linear optimization of transient gas networks. INFORMS J. Comput. 23(4):605–617.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Flores-Villarreal HJ, Ríos-Mercado RZ (2003) Computational experience with a GRG method for minimizing fuel consumption on cyclic natural gas networks. Mastorakis NE, Stathopulos IA, Manikopoulos C, Antoniou GE, Mladenov VM, Gonos IF, eds. Computational Methods in Circuits and Systems Applications (WSEAS Press, Athens, Greece), 90–94.Google Scholar
  • Hellemo L, Midthun K, Tomasgard A, Werner A (2012) Natural gas infrastructure design with an operational perspective. Energy Procedia 26:67–73.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hu B (2014) Oil and gas cooperation between China and Central Asia in an environment of political and resource competition. Petroleum Sci. 11(4):596–605.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Humpola J, Joormann I, Oucherif D, Pfetsch ME, Schewe L, Schmidt M, Schwarz R (2015) GasLib – A library of gas network instances. Data library, Optimization Online. http://www.optimization-online.org/DB\_HTML/2015/11/5216.html.Google Scholar
  • International Energy Agency (2018) Key world energy statistics 2018. Accessed October 31, 2018, https://webstore.iea.org/key-world-energy-statistics-2018.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koch T, Hiller B, Pfetsch ME, Schewe L, eds. (2015) Evaluating Gas Network Capacities (SIAM, Philadelphia).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lall HS, Percell PB (1990) A dynamic programming based gas pipeline optimizer. Bensoussan A, Lions JL, eds. Analysis and Optimization of Systems (Springer, New York), 123–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li X, Tomasgard A, Barton PI (2010) Decomposition strategy for natural gas production network design under uncertainty. Proc. 49th IEEE Conf. Decision Control (CDC) (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 188–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li X, Armagan E, Tomasgard A, Barton PI (2011) Stochastic pooling problem for natural gas production network design and operation under uncertainty. AIChE J. 57(8):2120–2135.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Löfberg J (2004) Yalmip: A toolbox for modeling and optimization in matlab. Proc. 2004 IEEE Internat. Sympos. Comput. Aided Control Systems Design (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 284–289.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mahlke D, Martin A, Moritz S (2010) A mixed integer approach for time-dependent gas network optimization. Optim. Methods Software 25(4):625–644.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin A, Moller M, Moritz S (2006) Mixed integer models for the stationary case of gas network optimization. Math. Programming 105(2–3):563–582.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moritz S (2007) A mixed integer approach for the transient case of gas network optimization. PhD thesis, Darmstadt University of Technology, Darmstadt, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Nesterov Y (2004) Introductory Lectures on Convex Optimization: A Basic Course, vol. 87 (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Percell PB, Ryan MJ (1987) Steady state optimization of gas pipeline network operation. Proc. 19th PSIG Annual Meeting (Pipeline Simulation Interest Group, Tulsa, OK).Google Scholar
  • Powell W (2011) Approximate Dynamic Programming: Solving the Curses of Dimensionality, Series in Probability and Statistics (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ríos-Mercado RZ (2017) Metaheuristics for Natural Gas Pipeline Networks (Springer International Publishing, New York), 1–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ríos-Mercado RZ, Borraz-Sánchez C (2015) Optimization problems in natural gas transportation systems: A state-of-the-art review. Appl. Energy 147:536–555.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ríos-Mercado RZ, Kim S, Boyd EA (2006) Efficient operation of natural gas transmission systems: A network-based heuristic for cyclic structures. Comput. Oper. Res. 33(8):2323–2351.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ríos-Mercado RZ, Wu S, Scott LR, Boyd EA (2002) A reduction technique for natural gas transmission network optimization problems. Ann. Oper. Res. 117(1–4):217–234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rømo F, Tomasgard A, Hellemo L, Fodstad M, Eidesen BH, Pedersen B (2009) Optimizing the Norwegian natural gas production and transport. Interfaces 39(1):46–56.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sahinidis NV (2017) BARON 17.8.9: Global optimization of mixed-integer nonlinear programs. User's manual. Accessed December 12, 2018, http://www.minlp.com/downloads/docs/baron%20manual.pdf. (The Optimization Firm, LLC, http://www.minlp.com).Google Scholar
  • US Department of Transportation (2013) Annual report mileage for gas distribution systems. U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. Accessed October 31, 2018, https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/data-and-statistics/pipeline/annual-report-mileage-gas-distribution-systems.Google Scholar
  • Wong PJ, Larson RE (1968a) Optimization of natural-gas pipeline systems via dynamic programming. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 13(5):475–481.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wong PJ, Larson RE (1968b) Optimization of tree-structured natural-gas transmission networks. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 24(3):613–626.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu S, Ríos-Mercado R, Boyd E, Scott L (2000) Model relaxations for the fuel cost minimization of steady-state gas pipeline networks. Math. Comput. Model. 31(2–3):197–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yao F (1983) Speed-up in dynamic programming. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 3(4):532–540.Google Scholar
  • Zimmer H (1975) Calculating optimum pipeline operations. Presentation, AGA Transmission Conference, American Gas Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.