Level 2 Reformulation Linearization Technique–Based Parallel Algorithms for Solving Large Quadratic Assignment Problems on Graphics Processing Unit Clusters

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2018.0866

References

  • Adams WP, Johnson TA (1994) Improved linear programming-based lower bounds for the quadratic assignment problem. DIMACS Ser. Discret. Math. Theor. Comput. Sci. 16:43–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adams WP, Guignard M, Peter MH, Hightower WL (2007) A level-2 reformulation–linearization technique bound for the Quadratic Assignment Problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 180(3):983–996.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anstreicher K, Brixius N, Goux J-P, Linderoth J (2002) Solving large quadratic assignment problems on computational grids. Math. Programming 91(3):563–588.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burer S, Vandenbussche D (2006) Solving lift-and-project relaxations of binary integer programs. SIAM J. Optim. 16(3):726–750.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burkard RE, Cela E, Pardalos PM, Pitsoulis LS (1998) The quadratic assignment problem. Du DZ, Pardalos PM, eds. Handbook of Combinatorial Optimization (Springer, Boston), 1713–1809.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burkard RE, Karisch SE, Rendl F (1997) QAPLIB–A quadratic assignment problem library. J. Global Optim. 10(4):391–403.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clausen J, Perregaard M (1997) Solving large quadratic assignment problems in parallel. Comput. Optim. Appl. 8(2):111–127.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Date K, Nagi R (2016) GPU-accelerated Hungarian algorithms for the linear assignment problem. Parallel Comput. 57:52–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frieze AM, Yadegar J (1983) On the quadratic assignment problem. Discrete Appl. Math. 5(1):89–98.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geoffrion AM (1974) Lagrangean relaxation for integer programming. Balinski ML, ed. Approaches to Integer Programming, Mathematical Programming Studies, vol 2. (Springer, Berlin), 82–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gonçalves AD, Pessoa AA, Bentes C, Farias R, Drummond LM (2017) A graphics processing unit algorithm to solve the quadratic assignment problem using level-2 reformulation-linearization technique. INFORMS J. Comput. 29(4):676–687.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hahn P, Grant T (1998) Lower bounds for the Quadratic Assignment Problem based upon a dual formulation. Oper. Res. 46(6):912–922.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hahn P, Roth A, Saltzman M, Guignard M (2013) Memory-aware parallelized RLT3 for solving quadratic assignment problems. Optimization Online. Accessed June 23, 2016, http://www.optimization-online.org/DB_FILE/2013/12/4144.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Hahn PM, Zhu Y-R, Guignard M, MacGregor Smith J (2010) Exact solution of emerging quadratic assignment problems. Internat. Trans. Oper. Res. 17(5):525–552.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hahn PM, Zhu Y-R, Guignard M, Hightower WL, Saltzman MJ (2012) A level-3 reformulation-linearization technique-based bound for the quadratic assignment problem. INFORMS J. Comput. 24(2):202–209.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Karisch SE, Rendl F (1995) Lower bounds for the quadratic assignment problem via triangle decompositions. Math. Programming 71(2):137–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaufman L, Broeckx F (1978) An algorithm for the quadratic assignment problem using bender’s decomposition. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2(3):207–211.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koopmans TC, Beckmann M (1957) Assignment problems and the location of economic activities. Econometrica J. Econometric Soc. 25(1):53–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawler EL (1963) The quadratic assignment problem. Management Sci. 9(4):586–599.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Loiola EM, Maia De Abreu NM, Boaventura-Netto PO, Hahn P, Querido T (2007) A survey for the quadratic assignment problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 176(2):657–690.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pardalos PM, Crouse JV (1989) A parallel algorithm for the quadratic assignment problem. Proc. 1989 ACM/IEEE Conf. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Washington, DC), 351–360.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peng J, Zhu T, Luo H, Toh K-C (2015) Semi-definite programming relaxation of quadratic assignment problems based on nonredundant matrix splitting. Comput. Optim. Appl. 60(1):171–198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ramachandran B, Pekny JF (1996) Dynamic matrix factorization methods for using formulations derived from higher order lifting techniques in the solution of the Quadratic Assignment Problem. Floudas CA, Pardalos PM, eds. State of the Art in Global Optimization (Springer, Boston), 75–92.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ramakrishnan KG, Resende MG, Ramachandran B, Pekny JF (2002) Tight QAP bounds via linear programming. Pardalos PM, Migdalas A, Burkard RE, eds. Combinatorial and Global Optimization, Series on Applied Mathematics, vol. 14 (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore), 297–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roucairol C (1987) A parallel branch and bound algorithm for the quadratic assignment problem. Discrete Appl. Math. 18(2):211–225.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sahni S, Gonzalez T (1976) P-complete approximation problems. J. ACM 23(3):555–565.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.