Distributionally Robust Design for Redundancy Allocation

References

• Ardakan MA, Hamadani AZ (2014) Reliability optimization of series-parallel systems with mixed redundancy strategy in subsystems. Reliability Engrg. System Safety 130:132–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A, Brekelmans R, den Hertog D, Vial J-P (2017) Globalized robust optimization for nonlinear uncertain inequalities. INFORMS J. Comput. 29(2):350–366.Link, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Sim M (2004) The price of robustness. Oper. Res. 52(1):35–53.Link, Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Gupta V, Kallus N (2018) Data-driven robust optimization. Math. Programming 167(2):235–292.Google Scholar
• Bhunia AK, Sahoo L, Roy D (2010) Reliability stochastic optimization for a series system with interval component reliability via genetic algorithm. Appl. Math. Comput. 216(3):929–939.Google Scholar
• Cheng Z, Wang X, Tian C, Wang F (2009). Mission reliability simulation of high-speed EMU service braking system. Proc. 8th Internat. Conf. Reliability Maintainability Safety (ICRMS 2009) (IEEE, Chengdu, China), 253–256.Google Scholar
• Chern MS (1992) On the computational complexity of reliability redundancy allocation in a series system. Oper. Res. Lett. 11(5):309–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coit DW (2003) Maximization of system reliability with a choice of redundancy strategies. IIE Trans. 35(6):535–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coit DW, Smith AE (1998) Redundancy allocation to maximize a lower percentile of the system time-to-failure distribution. IEEE Trans. Reliability 47(1):79–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coit DW, Smith AE (2002) Genetic algorithm to maximize a lower-bound for system time-to-failure with uncertain component Weibul parameters. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 41(14):423–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coit DW, Jin T, Wattanapongsakorn N (2004) System optimization with component reliability estimation uncertainty: A multi-criteria approach. IEEE Trans. Reliability 53(3):369–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elegbede AC, Chu C, Adjallah KH, Yalaoui F (2003) Reliability allocation through cost minimization. IEEE Trans. Reliability 52(1):106–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsayed EA (2012) Reliability Engineering, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Feizollahi MJ, Modarres M (2012) The robust deviation redundancy allocation problem with interval component reliabilities. IEEE Trans. Reliability 61(4):957–965.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feizollahi MJ, Ahmed S, Modarres M (2014) The robust redundancy allocation problem in series-parallel systems with budgeted uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Reliability 63(1):239–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feizollahi MJ, Soltan R, Feyzollahi H (2015) The robust cold standby redundancy allocation in series-parallel systems with budgeted uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Reliability 64(2):799–806.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Govindan K, Jafarian A, Azbari ME, Choi TM (2017) Optimal bi-objective redundancy allocation for systems reliability and risk management. IEEE Trans. Cybernetics 46(8):1735–1748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanasusanto GA, Roitch V, Kuhn D, Wiesemann W (2017) Ambiguous joint chance constraints under mean and dispersion information. Oper. Res. 65(3):715–767.Link, Google Scholar
• Hasegawa I, Uchida S (1999) Braking systems. Japan Railway Transport Rev. 20:52–59.Google Scholar
• Hooker JN (2002) Logic, optimization, and constraint programming. INFORMS J. Comput. 14(4):295–321.Link, Google Scholar
• Kreuser A, Johanson G (2017) Recent insights from the international common-cause failure data exchange project. Nuclear Engrg. Tech. 49(2):327–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuo W, Wan R (2007) Recent advances in optimal reliability allocation. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernetics—Part A: Systems Humans 37(2):143–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuo W, Prasad VR, Tillman FA, Hwang CL (2001) Optimal Reliability Design: Fundamentals and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Li YF, Ding Y, Zio E (2014) Random fuzzy extension of the universal generating function approach for the reliability assessment of multi-state systems under aleatory and epistemic uncertainties. IEEE Trans. Reliability 63(1):13–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X, Hu X (2008) Some new stochastic comparisons for redundancy allocations in series and parallel systems. Statist. Probab. Lett. 78(18):3388–3394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liao L, Köttig F (2014) Review of hybrid prognostics approaches for remaining useful life prediction of engineered systems, and an application to battery life prediction. IEEE Trans. Reliability 63(1):191–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nemirovski A, Shapiro A (2006) Convex approximations of chance constrained programs. SIAM J. Optim. 17(4):969–996.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ng SY, Xing Y, Tsui KL (2014) A naive Bayes model for robust remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion battery. Appl. Energy 118:114–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pecht M (2008) Prognostics and Health Management of Electronics (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prasad VR, Kuo W, Kim KO (2001) Maximization of a percentile life of a series system through component redundancy allocation. IIE Trans. 33(12):1071–1079.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prékopa A (1998) Bounds on probabilities and expectations using multivariate moments of discrete distributions. Studia Scientiarum Mathematiearum Hungarica 34:349–378.Google Scholar
• Rausand M, Høyland A (2004) System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Shapiro A (2001) On duality theory of conic linear problems. Goberna MÁ, López MA, eds. Semi-Infinite Programming (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston), 135–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun MX, Li YF, Zio E (2017) On the optimal redundancy allocation for multi-state series-parallel systems under epistemic uncertainty. Reliability Engrg. System Safety., ePub ahead of print December 5, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.11.025.Google Scholar
• Tang S, Yu C, Wang X, Guo X, Si X (2014) Remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on the Wiener process with measurement error. Energies 7(2):520–547.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tekiner-Mogulkoc H, Coit DW (2011) System reliability optimization considering uncertainty: Minimization of the coefficient of variation for series-parallel systems. IEEE Trans. Reliability 60(30):667–674.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wierman TE, Rasmuson DM, Mosleh A (2007) Common-Cause Failure Database and Analysis System: Event Data Collection, Classification, and Coding (NUREG/CR-6268) (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• Wiesemann W, Kuhn D, Sim M (2014) Distributionally robust convex optimization. Oper. Res. 62(6):1358–1376.Link, Google Scholar
• Xie W, Ahmed S (2018) Distributionally robust chance constrained optimal power flow with renewables: A conic reformulation. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 33(2):1860–1867.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yalaoui A, Chatelet E, Chu C (2005) A new dynamic programming method for reliability redundancy allocation in a parallel-series system. IEEE Trans. Reliability 54(2):254–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yanikoglu I, den Hertog D (2013) Safe approximations of ambiguous chance constraints using historical data. INFORMS J. Comput. 25(4):666–681.Link, Google Scholar
• Zaretalab A, Hajipour V, Sharifi M, Shahriari MR (2015) A knowledge-based archive multi-objective simulated annealing algorithm to optimize series-parallel system with choice of redundancy strategies. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 80:33–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao P, Chan PS, Ng HKT (2011) Optimal allocation of redundancies in series systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 220(3):673–683.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao R, Liu B (2003) Stochastic programming models for general redundancy-optimization problems. IEEE Trans. Reliability 52(2):181–191.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zymler S, Kuhn D, Rustem B (2013) Distributionally robust joint chance constraints with second-order moment information. Math. Programming 137(1–2):167–198.Crossref, Google Scholar