Understanding and Predicting Users’ Rating Behavior: A Cognitive Perspective

References

• Armstrong DJ, Hardgrave BC (2007) Understanding mindshift learning: The transition to object-oriented development. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 31(3):453–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bai J, Li L, Zeng D, Li Q (2017) Associated activation-driven enrichment: Understanding implicit information from a cognitive perspective. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 29(12):2655–2668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berinsky AJ, Huber GA, Lenz GS (2012) Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Anal. 20(3):351–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biocca F, Owen C, Tang A, Bohil C (2007) Attention issues in spatial information systems: Directing mobile users’ visual attention using augmented reality. J. Management Inform. Systems 23(4):163–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect. Psych. Sci. 6(1):3–5.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen M (2017) Efficient vector representation for documents through corruption. Proc. 5th Internat. Conf. Learn. Representations, Toulon, France.Google Scholar
• Chen H, Sun M, Tu C, Lin Y, Liu Z (2016) Neural sentiment classification with user and product attention. Proc. 2016 Conf. Empirical Methods Natl. Language Processing (Association for Computational Linguistics, Austin, TX), 1650–1659.Google Scholar
• Dou ZY (2017) Capturing user and product information for document level sentiment analysis with deep memory network. Proc. 2017 Conf. Empirical Methods Natl. Language Processing (Association for Computational Linguistics, Copenhagen), 521–526.Google Scholar
• Dou W, Lim KH, Su C, Zhou N, Cui N (2010) Brand positioning strategy using search engine marketing. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 34(2):261–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fuchs M, Zanker M (2012) Multi-criteria ratings for recommender systems: An empirical analysis in the tourism domain. Internat. Conf. Electronic Commerce Web Tech. (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 100–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gräbner D, Zanker M, Fliedl G, Fuchs M (2012) Classification of customer reviews based on sentiment analysis. 19th Conf. Inform. Comm. Tech. Tourism (ENTER) (Springer, Helsingborg, Sweden), 460–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta N, Di Fabbrizio G, Haffner P (2010) Capturing the stars: Predicting ratings for service and product reviews. Proc. Human Language Tech.: 11th Annual Conf. North Amer. Chapter Assoc. Comput. Linguistics (NAACL HLT) 2010 Workshop Semantic Search (Association for Computational Linguistics, Los Angeles), 36–43.Google Scholar
• Huang L, Tan CH, Ke W, Wei KK (2014) Do we order product review information display? How? Inform. Management 51(7):883–894.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin Z, Li Q, Zeng DD, Zhan Y, Liu R, Wang L, Ma H (2016) Jointly modeling review content and aspect ratings for review rating prediction. Proc. 39th Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. Res. Development Inform. Retrieval (ACM, Pisa, Italy), 893–896.Google Scholar
• Kalchbrenner N, Grefenstette E, Blunsom P (2014) A convolutional neural network for modelling sentences. Proc. 52nd Annual Meeting Assoc. Comput. Linguistics (Vol. 1: Long Papers) (Association for Computational Linguistics, Baltimore), 655–665.Google Scholar
• Khatri V, Vessey I, Ramesh V, Clay P, Park SJ (2006) Understanding conceptual schemas: Exploring the role of application and IS domain knowledge. Inform. Systems Res. 17(1):81–99.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim Y (2014) Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. Proc. 2014 Conf. Empirical Methods Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (Association for Computational Linguistics, Doha, Qatar), 1746–1751.Google Scholar
• Kinga D, Adam JB (2015) A method for stochastic optimization. Internat. Conf. Learn. Representations (ICLR), San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
• Kiros R, Zhu Y, Salakhutdinov RR, Zemel R, Urtasun R, Torralba A, Fidler S (2015) Skip-thought vectors. Proc. 29th Annual Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (NIPS) (Curran Associates, Red Hook, NY), 3294–3302.Google Scholar
• Lau RY, Song D, Li Y, Cheung TC, Hao JX (2009) Toward a fuzzy domain ontology extraction method for adaptive e-learning. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 21(6):800–813.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Le Q, Mikolov T (2014) Distributed representations of sentences and documents. Proc. 31st Internat. Conf. Machine Learn., Beijing, China, 1188–1196.Google Scholar
• Leal F, Malheiro B, Burguillo JC (2017) Prediction and analysis of hotel ratings from crowd-sourced data. World Conf. Inform. Systems Tech., Porto Santo Island, Madeira, Portugal, 493–502.Google Scholar
• LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521(7553):436–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li J, Yang H, Zong C (2018) Document-level multi-aspect sentiment classification by jointly modeling users, aspects, and overall ratings. Proc. 27th Internat. Conf. Comput. Linguistics, Santa Fe, NM, 925–936.Google Scholar
• Ma D, Li S, Zhang X, Wang H (2017) Interactive attention networks for aspect-level sentiment classification. Proc. 26th Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, Melbourne, Australia, 4068–4074.Google Scholar
• Mayer RE, Moreno R (2003) Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist 38(1):43–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mikolov T, Chen K, Corrado G, Dean J (2013a) Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. Internat. Conf. Learn. Representations (ICLR) Workshop Track, Scottsdale, AZ.Google Scholar
• Mikolov T, Sutskever I, Chen K, Corrado GS, Dean J (2013b) Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 26:3111–3119.Google Scholar
• Moghaddam S, Ester M (2011) Ilda: Interdependent lda model for learning latent aspects and their ratings from online product reviews. Proc. 34th Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. Res. Development Inform. Retrieval (ACM, New York), 665–674.Google Scholar
• Mudambi  SM, Schuff D (2010) What makes a helpful review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quart. 34(1):185–200.Google Scholar
• Nelson P (1970) Information and consumer behavior. J. Political Econom. 78(2):311–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Qu L, Ifrim G, Weikum G (2010) The bag-of-opinions method for review rating prediction from sparse text patterns. Proc. 23rd Internat. Conf. Comput. Linguistics (Tsinghua University Press, Beijing), 913–921.Google Scholar
• Rumelhart DE (2017) Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. Spiro RJ, Bruce BC, Brewer WF, eds. Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension (Routledge, Abingdon, UK), 33–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rush AM, Chopra S, Weston J (2015) A neural attention model for abstractive sentence summarization. Proc. 2015 Conf. Empirical Methods Natl. Language Processing (Association for Computational Linguistics, Lisbon, Portugal), 379–389.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snyder B, Barzilay R (2007) Multiple aspect ranking using the good grief algorithm. Proc. Conf. North Amer. Chapter Assoc. Comput. Linguistics (Association for Computational Linguistics, Rochester, NY), 300–307.Google Scholar
• Swanson RA, Law BD (1993) Whole-part-whole learning model. Performance Improvement Quart. 6(1):43–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sweller J (1988) Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Sci. 12(2):257–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang D, Qin B, Liu T (2015) Document modeling with gated recurrent neural network for sentiment classification. Proc. 2015 Conf. Empirical Methods Natl. Language Processing (Association for Computational Linguistics, Lisbon, Portugal), 1422–1432.Google Scholar
• Tang D, Qin B, Liu T (2016) Aspect level sentiment classification with deep memory network. Proc. 2016 Conf. Empirical Methods Natl. Language Processing (Association for Computational Linguistics, Austin), 214–224.Google Scholar
• Vali H, Xu D, Yildirim B (2015a) The effects of repeating purchase cues and mixed reviews on product attribution. Proc. 36th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems, Fort Worth, TX.Google Scholar
• Vali H, Xu D, Yildirim M (2015b) The effect of conflicting consumer reviews on the accuracy of a purchase decisions. 21st Americas Conf. Inform. Systems, Puerto Rico.Google Scholar
• Vegas J, Crestani F, De La Fuente P (2007) Context representation for web search results. J. Inform. Sci. 33(1):77–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang W, Benbasat I (2009) Interactive decision aids for consumer decision making in e-commerce: The influence of perceived strategy restrictiveness. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 33(2):293–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang H, Lu Y, Zhai C (2010) Latent aspect rating analysis on review text data: A rating regression approach. Proc. 16th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York), 783–792.Google Scholar
• Wang H, Lu Y, Zhai C (2011) Latent aspect rating analysis without aspect keyword supervision. Proc. 17th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York), 618–626.Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Huang M, Zhu X, Zhao L (2016) Attention-based LSTM for aspect-level sentiment classification. Proc. 2016 Conf. Empirical Methods Natl. Language Processing, Austin, TX, 606–615.Google Scholar
• Winn W (2013) Cognitive perspectives in psychology. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (Routledge, Abingdon, UK), 90–123.Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Yang D, Dyer C, He X, Smola AJ, Hovy EH (2016) Hierarchical attention networks for document classification. Proc. 2016 Conf. North Amer. Chapter Assoc. Comput. Linguistics, San Diego, CA, 1480–1489.Google Scholar
• Yin D, Bond SD, Zhang H (2013) Anxious or angry? Effects of discrete emotions on the perceived helpfulness of online reviews. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 38(2):539–560.Google Scholar
• Yu J, Zha ZJ, Wang M, Chua TS (2011) Aspect ranking: Identifying important product aspects from online consumer reviews. Proc. 49th Annual Meeting Assoc. Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, vol. 1 (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 1496–1505.Google Scholar
• Zha ZJ, Yu J, Tang J, Wang M, Chua TS (2014) Product aspect ranking and its applications. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. 26(5):1211–1224.Crossref, Google Scholar