A Multilevel Simulation Optimization Approach for Quantile Functions

References

• Ankenman B, Nelson BL, Staum J (2010) Stochastic kriging for simulation metamodeling. Oper. Res. 58(2):371–382.Link, Google Scholar
• Asmussen S, Glynn PW (2007) Stochastic Simulation: Algorithms and Analysis, vol. 57 (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bahadur RR (1966) A note on quantiles in large samples. Ann. Math. Statist. 37(3):577–580.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bekki JM, Fowler JW, Mackulak GT, Nelson BL (2007) Using quantiles in ranking and selection procedures. Tew J, Barton R, Henderson S, Biller B, Hsieh M, Shortle J, eds. Proc. 39th Conf. Winter Simulation (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1722–1728.Google Scholar
• Bondell HD, Reich BJ, Wang H (2010) Noncrossing quantile regression curve estimation. Biometrika 97(4):825–838.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bull AD (2011) Convergence rates of efficient global optimization algorithms. J. Machine Learn. Res. 12(88):2879–2904.Google Scholar
• Chen EJ (2009) Metamodels for estimating quantiles of systems with one controllable parameter. Simulation 85(5):307–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen X, Kim KK (2016) Efficient VaR and CVaR measurement via stochastic kriging. INFORMS J. Comput. 28(4):629–644.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen X, Hemmati S, Yang F (2017) Stochastic co-kriging for steady-state simulation metamodeling. Page EH, Wainer G, Chan V, D'Ambroglio A, Zacharewicz, Mustafee N, eds. Proc. 2017 Winter Simulation Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1750–1761.Google Scholar
• Chen CH, Lin J, Yücesan E, Chick SE (2000) Simulation budget allocation for further enhancing the efficiency of ordinal optimization. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems 10(3):251–270.Google Scholar
• Cole T (1988) Fitting smoothed centile curves to reference data. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A. 151(3):385–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cope EW, Mignola G, Antonini G, Ugoccioni R (2009) Challenges in measuring operational risk from loss data. J. Oper. Risk. 4(4):3–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dabo-Niang S, Thiam B (2010) Robust quantile estimation and prediction for spatial processes. Statist. Probab. Lett. 80(17):1447–1458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dowd P (1982) Lognormal kriging—The general case. J. Internat. Assoc. Math. Geology 14(5):475–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He X (1997) Quantile curves without crossing. Amer. Statist. 51(2):186–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong LJ, Liu G (2009) Simulating sensitivities of conditional value at risk. Management Sci. 55(2):281–293.Link, Google Scholar
• Hong LJ, Nelson BL (2006) Discrete optimization via simulation using compass. Oper. Res. 54(1):115–129.Link, Google Scholar
• Hong LJ, Hu Z, Liu G (2014) Monte Carlo methods for value-at-risk and conditional value-at-risk: A review. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simulation 24(4):1–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang D, Allen TT, Notz WI, Zeng N (2006) Global optimization of stochastic black-box systems via sequential kriging meta-models. J. Global Optim. 34(3):441–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jalali H, Van Nieuwenhuyse I, Picheny V (2017) Comparison of kriging-based algorithms for simulation optimization with heterogeneous noise. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 261(1):279–301.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones DR (2001) A taxonomy of global optimization methods based on response surfaces. J. Global Optim. 21(4):345–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones DR, Schonlau M, Welch WJ (1998) Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. J. Global Optim. 13(4):455–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy MC, O’Hagan A (2000) Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available. Biometrika 87(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleijnen JP, Van Beers W, Van Nieuwenhuyse I (2012) Expected improvement in efficient global optimization through bootstrapped kriging. J. Global Optim. 54(1):59–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koenker R (1984) A note on l-estimates for linear models. Statist. Probab. Lett. 2(6):323–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koenker R, Hallock KF (2001) Quantile regression. J. Econom. Perspect. 15(4):143–156.Google Scholar
• Longerstaey J, Martin S (1996) Riskmetrics technical document (Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, New York).Google Scholar
• Mardia KV, Marshall RJ (1984) Maximum likelihood estimation of models for residual covariance in spatial regression. Biometrika 71(1):135–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nakayama MK (2014) Confidence intervals for quantiles using sectioning when applying variance-reduction techniques. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simulation 24(4):1–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nance RE, Sargent RG (2002) Perspectives on the evolution of simulation. Oper. Res. 50(1):161–172.Link, Google Scholar
• Pedrielli G, Wang S, Ng SH (2020) An extended two-stage sequential optimization approach: Properties and performance. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 287(3):929–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Picheny V (2015) Multiobjective optimization using Gaussian process emulators via stepwise uncertainty reduction. Statist. Comput. 25(6):1265–1280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Picheny V, Ginsbourger D, Richet Y, Caplin G (2013) Quantile-based optimization of noisy computer experiments with tunable precision. Technometrics 55(1):2–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quan N, Yin J, Ng SH, Lee LH (2013) Simulation optimization via kriging: A sequential search using expected improvement with computing budget constraints. IIE Trans. 45(7):763–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Regis RG, Shoemaker CA (2007) A stochastic radial basis function method for the global optimization of expensive functions. INFORMS J. Comput. 19(4):497–509.Link, Google Scholar
• Santner TJ, Williams BJ, Notz WI (2013) The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
• Seila AF (1982) A batching approach to quantile estimation in regenerative simulations. Management Sci. 28(5):573–581.Link, Google Scholar
• Shahriari B, Swersky K, Wang Z, Adams RP, De Freitas N (2016) Taking the human out of the loop: A review of Bayesian optimization. Proc. IEEE 104(1):148–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shim J, Hwang C, Seok KH (2009) Non-crossing quantile regression via doubly penalized kernel machine. Comput. Statist. 24(1):83–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivas N, Krause A, Kakade SM, Seeger M (2010) Gaussian process optimization in the bandit setting: No regret and experimental design. Furnkranz J, Joachims T, eds. Proc. 27th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (Omnipress, Haifa, Israel), 1015–1022.Google Scholar
• Torn A, Zilinskas A (1989) Global Optimization (Springer-Verlag, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang S, Ng SH (2017) A joint Gaussian process metamodel to improve quantile predictions. Page EH, Wainer G, Chan V, D'Ambroglio A, Zacharewicz, Mustafee N, eds. Proc. 2017 Winter Simulation Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1891–1902.Google Scholar
• Wang S, Ng SH, Haskell WB (2018) Quantile simulation optimization with stochastic co-kriging model. Johnson B, Jain S, Rose O, Rabe R, Skoogh A, Mustafee N, Juan AA, eds. 2018 Winter Simulation Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 2119–2130.Google Scholar
• Wipplinger E (2007) Philippe Jorion: Value at risk: The new benchmark for managing financial risk. Financial Markets Portfolio Management 21(3):397–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xie W, Wang B, Zhang Q (2018) Metamodel-assisted risk analysis for stochastic simulation with input uncertainty. Johnson B, Jain S, Rose O, Rabe R, Skoogh A, Mustafee N, Juan AA, eds. Proc. 2018 Winter Simulation Conf. (IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ), 1766–1777.Google Scholar
• Yi G, Shi J, Choi T (2011) Penalized Gaussian process regression and classification for high-dimensional nonlinear data. Biometrics 67(4):1285–1294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yin J, Ng SH, Ng KM (2011) Kriging metamodel with modified nugget-effect: The heteroscedastic variance case. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 61(3):760–777.Crossref, Google Scholar