Speeding Up Paulson’s Procedure for Large-Scale Problems Using Parallel Computing
Published Online:4 Jun 2021https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2020.1054
References
- (1954) A single-sample multiple decision procedure for ranking means of normal populations with known variances. Ann. Math. Statist. 25(1):16–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) Stochastic Models of Manufacturing Systems (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
- (2015) Ranking and selection: Efficient simulation budget allocation. Fu M, ed. Handbook of Simulation Optimization (Springer, New York), 45–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Subjective probability and Bayesian methodology. Henderson SG, Nelson BL, eds. Elsevier Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Simulation (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 225–257.Google Scholar
- (2014) Simulation optimization library. Retrieved August 25, 2019, http://www.simopt.org.Google Scholar
- (2006) Fully sequential indifference-zone selection procedures with variance-dependent sampling. Naval Res. Logist. 53(5):464–476.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Discrete optimization via simulation. Fu M, ed. Handbook of Simulation Optimization (Springer, New York), 9–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Speeding up pairwise comparisons for large scale ranking and selection. Roeder TMK, Frazier PI, Szechtman R, Zhou E, Huschka T, Chick SE, eds. Proc. 2016 Winter Simulation Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 749–757.Google Scholar
- (1980) Asymptotically optimal procedures for sequential adaptive selection of the best of several normal means. Technical report, Department of Operations Research and Industrial Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
- (1980) Sequential selection procedures based on confidence sequences for normal populations. Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 9(16):1657–1676.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) A fully sequential procedure for indifference-zone selection in simulation. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simulation 11(3):251–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2006) Selecting the best system. Henderson SG, Nelson BL, eds. Elsevier Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Simulation (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 501–534.Google Scholar
- (2011) Large-scale ranking and selection using cloud computing. Jain S, Creasey RR, Himmelspach J, White KP, Fu M, eds. Proc. 2011 Winter Simulation Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 4051–4061.Google Scholar
- (2015) Fully sequential procedures for large-scale ranking-and-selection problems in parallel computing environments. Oper. Res. 63(5):1177–1194.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) An efficient fully sequential selection procedure guaranteeing probably approximately correct selection. Chan WKV, D’Ambrogio A, Zacharewicz G, Mustafee M, eds. Proc. 2017 Winter Simulation Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 2225–2236.Google Scholar
- (2001) Simple procedures for selecting the best simulated system when the number of alternatives is large. Oper. Res. 49(6):950–963.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Efficient ranking and selection in parallel computing environments. Oper. Res. 65(3):821–836.Link, Google Scholar
- (1964) A sequential procedure for selecting the population with the largest mean from k normal populations. Ann. Math. Statist. 35(1):174–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) A new framework for parallel ranking & selection using an adaptive standard. Rabe M, Juan AA, Mustafee N, Skoogh A, Jain S, Johansson B, eds. Proc. 2018 Winter Simulation Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 2201–2212.Google Scholar
- (1969) A comparison of the asymptotic expected sample sizes of two sequential procedures for ranking problem. Ann. Math. Statist. 40(6):2198–2202.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1978) On two-stage selection procedures and related probability-inequalities. Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 7(8):799–811.Crossref, Google Scholar

