The Continuous Time-Resource Trade-off Scheduling Problem with Time Windows

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2022.0142

References

  • Artigues C, Lopez P (2015) Energetic reasoning for energy-constrained scheduling with a continuous resource. J. Scheduling 18(3):225–241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Artigues C, Demassey S, Neron E, eds. (2008) Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Artigues C, Michelon P, Reusser S (2003) Insertion techniques for static and dynamic resource constrained project scheduling. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 149(2):249–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Artigues C, Hébrard E, Quilliot A, Toussaint H (2021) Multi-mode RCPSP with safety margin maximization: Models and algorithms. Parlier GH, Liberatore F, Demange M, eds. Proc. 10th Internat. Conf. Oper. Res. Enterprise Systems ICORES 2021 (SCITEPRESS, Setúbal, Portugal), 129–136.Google Scholar
  • Artigues C, Hébrard E, Quilliot A, Toussaint H (2024) The continuous time-resource tradeoff scheduling problem with time windows. https://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2022.0142, https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2022.0142.Google Scholar
  • Artigues C, Hébrard E, Pencolé Y, Schutt A, Stuckey PJ (2018a) A study of evacuation planning for wildfires. Seventeenth Internat. Workshop Constraint Model. Reformulation (ModRef 2018) (Lille, France).Google Scholar
  • Artigues C, Hébrard E, Pencolé Y, Schutt A, Stuckey PJ (2018b) Data instance generator and optimization models for evacuation planning in the event of wildfire. Di Stefano G, Navarra A, eds. Proc. GEOSAFE Workshop Robust Solutions Fire Fighting RSFF 2018, vol. 2146 (CEUR-WS, Germany), 75–86.Google Scholar
  • Bayram V (2016) Optimization models for large scale network evacuation planning and management: A literature review. Surveys Oper. Res. Management Sci. 21(2):63–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beşikci U, Bilge Ü, Ulusoy G (2015) Multi-mode resource constrained multi-project scheduling and resource portfolio problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 240(1):22–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brucker P, Neyer J (1998) Tabu-search for the multi-mode job-shop problem. OR Spectrum 20(1):21–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlier J, Sahli A, Jouglet A, Pinson E (2022) A faster checker of the energetic reasoning for the cumulative scheduling problem. Internat. J. Production Res. 60(11):3419–3434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dauzère-Pérès S, Roux W, Lasserre JB (1998) Multi-resource shop scheduling with resource flexibility. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 107(2):289–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Demeulemeester E, Herroelen WS (2006) Project Scheduling: A Research Handbook, vol. 49 (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
  • Demeulemeester E, De reyck B, Herroelen W (2000) The discrete time/resource trade-off problem in project networks: A branch-and-bound approach. IIE Trans. 32(11):1059–1069.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Even C, Pillac V, Van Hentenryck P (2015a) Convergent plans for large-scale evacuations. Bonet B, Koenig S, eds. Proc. Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA), 1121–1127.Google Scholar
  • Even C, Schutt A, Van Hentenryck P (2015b) A constraint programming approach for non-preemptive evacuation scheduling. Pesant G, ed. Principles Practice Constraint Programming - 21st Internat. Conf., CP 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 9255 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 574–591.Google Scholar
  • Fortemps P, Hapke M (1997) On the disjunctive graph for project scheduling. Foundations Comput. Decision Sci. 22(3):195–209.Google Scholar
  • Garey MR, Johnson DS (1979) Computers and Intractability, vol. 174 (Freeman, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  • GEO-SAFE (2020) Geospatial based environment for optimisation systems addressing fire emergencies. Accessed December 21, 2020, https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/691161.Google Scholar
  • Habib M, McConnell R, Paul C, Viennot L (2000) Lex-BFS and partition refinement, with applications to transitive orientation, interval graph recognition and consecutive ones testing. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 234(1–2):59–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hartmann S, Briskorn D (2010) A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207(1):1–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hasan MH, Van Hentenryck P (2020) Large-scale zone-based evacuation planning—Part I: Models and algorithms. Networks 77(1):127–146.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herroelen W (2005) Project scheduling—Theory and practice. Production Oper. Management 14(4):413–432.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Horn WA (1974) Some simple scheduling algorithms. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. 21(1):177–185.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kolisch R (1996) Serial and parallel resource-constrained project scheduling methods revisited: Theory and computation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 90(2):320–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kolisch R (2013) Project Scheduling Under Resource Constraints: Efficient Heuristics for Several Problem Classes (Springer Science & Business Media, New York).Google Scholar
  • Naber A (2017) Resource-constrained project scheduling with flexible resource profiles in continuous time. Comput. Oper. Res. 84:33–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Naber A, Kolisch R (2014) MIP models for resource-constrained project scheduling with flexible resource profiles. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 239(2):335–348.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nattaf M, Artigues C, Lopez P (2015) A hybrid exact method for a scheduling problem with a continuous resource and energy constraints. Constraints 20(3):304–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nattaf M, Horváth M, Kis T, Artigues C, Lopez P (2019) Polyhedral results and valid inequalities for the continuous energy-constrained scheduling problem. Discrete Appl. Math. 258:188–203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quilliot A, Artigues C, Hebrard E, Toussaint H (2019) Models and algorithms for natural disaster evacuation problems. Ganzha M, Maciaszek LA, Paprzycki M, eds. Proc. 2019 Federated Conf. Comput. Sci. Inform. Systems FedCSIS 2019, Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems, vol. 18 (Polish Information Processing Society, Warsaw, Poland), 143–146.Google Scholar
  • Schwindt C, Zimmermann J, eds. (2015) Handbook on Project Management and Scheduling, vol. 1 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland).Google Scholar
  • Seyed-Hosseini SM, Sabzehparvar M (2008) A mathematical model for the continuous time/resource trade-off problem. Kuwait J. Sci. Engrg. 35(1B):197–215.Google Scholar
  • Shahparvari S, Chhetri P, Abbasi B, Abareshi A (2016) Enhancing emergency evacuation response of late evacuees: Revisiting the case of Australian Black Saturday bushfire. Transportation Res. Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 93:148–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steeneck DW, Sarin SC (2015) Resource-constrained project scheduling with concave processing rate functions. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 66(5):794–806.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tao S, Dong ZS (2018) Multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem with alternative project structures. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 125:333–347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tomita E, Tanaka A, Takahashi H (2006) The worst-case time complexity for generating all maximal cliques and computational experiments. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 363(1):28–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tritschler M, Naber A, Kolisch R (2017) A hybrid metaheuristic for resource-constrained project scheduling with flexible resource profiles. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 262(1):262–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Peteghem V, Vanhoucke M (2014) An experimental investigation of metaheuristics for the multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem on new data set instances. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 235(1):62–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Waligóra G (2011) Heuristic approaches to discrete-continuous project scheduling problems to minimize the makespan. Comput. Optim. Appl. 48(2):399–421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weglarz J, Józefowska J, Mika M, Waligóra G (2011) Project scheduling with finite or infinite number of activity processing modes—A survey. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 208(3):177–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang M, Schutt A, Stuckey PJ (2019) Time table edge finding with energy variables. Schiex T, de Givry S, eds. Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming - 25th Internat. Conf., CP 2019, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11802 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 633–642.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.