Unified Framework for Choice-Based Facility Location Problem
References
- (2007) Competitive facility location and design problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 182(1):40–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Luce rule with limited consideration. Math. Social Sci. 93:52–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) p-hub approach for the optimal park-and-ride facility location problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 226(2):277–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) The maximum capture problem with random utilities: Problem formulation and algorithms. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 143(3):518–530.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Branch-and-bound algorithm for a competitive facility location problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 40(8):2062–2070.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Models and algorithms for competitive facility location problems with different customer behavior. Ann. Math. Artificial Intelligence 76(1–2):93–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Mixed-integer rounding enhanced benders decomposition for multiclass service-system staffing and scheduling with arrival rate uncertainty. Management Sci. 63(7):2073–2091.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Fractional 0–1 programming: Applications and algorithms. J. Global Optim. 69(1):255–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) The p-median bilevel problem under preferences of the customers. Ríos-Mercado RZ, Camacho-Vallejo JF, González-Velarde JL, Laguna M, eds. Recent Advances in Theory, Methods, and Practice of Operations Research (UANL, Monterrey, Mexico), 121–127.Google Scholar
- (2006) Capacitated plant selection in a decentralized manufacturing environment: A bilevel optimization approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 169(1):97–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Solving the p-median bilevel problem with order through a hybrid heuristic. Appl. Soft Comput. 60:73–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Competitive facility location with selfish users and queues. Oper. Res. 67(2):479–497.Abstract, Google Scholar
- (2015) A leader–follower model for discrete competitive facility location. Comput. Oper. Res. 64:51–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Competitive facility location with random attractiveness. Oper. Res. Lett. 46(3):312–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) General luce model. Econom. Theory 68(4):811–826.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Closest assignment constraints in discrete location problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 219(1):49–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) New heuristic algorithms for discrete competitive location problems with binary and partially binary customer behavior. Comput. Oper. Res. 79:12–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) The huff vs. the pareto-huff customer choice rules in a discrete competitive location model. Gervasi O, Murgante B, Misra S, Stankova E, Torre CM, Rocha AMAC, Taniar D, Apduhan BO, Tarantino E, Ryu Y, eds. Proc. Internat. Conf. on Comput. Sci. and Its Applications (Springer, Berlin), 583–592.Google Scholar
- (2021) Exact and heuristic solutions of a discrete competitive location model with pareto-huff customer choice rule. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 385:113200.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) The competitive facility location problem in a duopoly: Advances beyond trees. Oper. Res. 66(4):1058–1067.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) A comparison of linear reformulations for multinomial logit choice probabilities in facility location models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 232(3):689–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1964) Defining and estimating a trading area. J. Marketing 28(3):34–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Preventive healthcare facility location planning with quality-conscious clients. OR Spectrum 43(1):59–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Solution of asymmetric discrete competitive facility location problems using ranking of candidate locations. Soft Comput. 24(23):17705–17713.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021a) Branch-and-cut approach based on generalized benders decomposition for facility location with limited choice rule. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 293(1):109–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021b) Generalized benders decomposition for competitive facility location with concave demand and zone-specialized variable attractiveness. Comput. Oper. Res. 130:105236.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022b) Locating facilities under competition and market expansion: Formulation, optimization, and implications. Production Oper. Management 31(7):3021–3042.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Unified framework for choice-based facility location problem. https://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2022.0366.cd, https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2022.0366.Google Scholar
- (2022a) Profit-maximizing parcel locker location problem under threshold luce model. Transportation Res. Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 157:102541.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Outer approximation and submodular cuts for maximum capture facility location problems with random utilities. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 266(1):46–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) A multicut outer-approximation approach for competitive facility location under random utilities. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 284(3):874–881.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Revealed attention. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(5):2183–2205.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Store location with multipurpose shopping trips and a new random utility customers’ choice model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 305(2):708–721.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Discretization results for the huff and pareto-huff competitive location models on networks. TOP 6(2):247–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Competitive multifacility location on networks: The (r|xp)-medianoid problem. J. Regulatory Sci. 44(3):569–588.Google Scholar
- (2012) The impact of client choice on preventive healthcare facility network design. OR Spectrum 34(2):349–370.Crossref, Google Scholar

