An Efficient Scenario Reduction Method for Problems with Higher Moment Coherent Risk Measures

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2022.0375

References

  • Aksaraylı M, Pala O (2018) A polynomial goal programming model for portfolio optimization based on entropy and higher moments. Expert Systems Appl. 94:185–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arpón S, Homem-de Mello T, Pagnoncelli B (2018) Scenario reduction for stochastic programs with conditional value-at-risk. Math. Programming 170(1):327–356.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber JM, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 9(3):203–228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beltran F, de Oliveira W, Finardi EC (2017) Application of scenario tree reduction via quadratic process to medium-term hydrothermal scheduling problem. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 32(6):4351–4361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Tal A, Teboulle M (1986) Expected utility, penalty functions, and duality in stochastic nonlinear programming. Management Sci. 32(11):1445–1466.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ben-Tal A, Teboulle M (2007) An old-new concept of convex risk measures: The optimized certainty equivalent. Math. Finance 17(3):449–476.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Z, Yan Z (2018) Scenario tree reduction methods through clustering nodes. Comput. Chemical Engrg. 109:96–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delbaen F (2002) Coherent risk measures on general probability spaces. Sandman K, Schönbucher PJ, eds. Advances in Finance and Stochastics (Springer, Berlin), 1–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dupačová J, Gröwe-Kuska N, Römisch W (2003) Scenario reduction in stochastic programming. Math. Programming 95(3):493–511.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fairbrother A, Turner A, Wallace SW (2018) Scenario generation for single-period portfolio selection problems with tail risk measures: Coping with high dimensions and integer variables. INFORMS J. Comput. 30(3):472–491.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fairbrother J, Turner A, Wallace SW (2022) Problem-driven scenario generation: An analytical approach for stochastic programs with tail risk measure. Math. Programming 191:141–182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feng Y, Ryan SM (2013) Scenario construction and reduction applied to stochastic power generation expansion planning. Comput. Oper. Res. 40(1):9–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gao J, Li D (2013) Optimal cardinality constrained portfolio selection. Oper. Res. 61(3):745–761.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • He X, Zhang W (2023) Two-stage international portfolio models with higher moment risk measures. Comput. Oper. Res. 154:106200.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He X, Zhang W (2024) An efficient scenario reduction method for problems with higher moment coherent risk measures. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2022.0375.cd, https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2022.0375.Google Scholar
  • Heitsch H, Römisch W (2003) Scenario reduction algorithms in stochastic programming. Comput. Optim. Appl. 24(2–3):187–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heitsch H, Römisch W (2007) A note on scenario reduction for two-stage stochastic programs. Oper. Res. Lett. 35(6):731–738.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hitaj A, Zambruno G (2018) Portfolio optimization using modified Herfindahl constraint. Consigli G, Stefani S, Zambruno G, eds. Handbook of Recent Advances in Commodity and Financial Modeling: Quantitative Methods in Banking, Finance, Insurance, Energy and Commodity Markets (Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland), 211–239.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hu J, Li H (2019) A new clustering approach for scenario reduction in multi-stochastic variable programming. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 34(5):3813–3825.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hu J, Li H, Liu Z (2021) Scenario reduction based on correlation sensitivity and its application in microgrid optimization. Internat. Trans. Electr. Energy Systems 31(3):e12747.Google Scholar
  • Kalayci CB, Polat O, Akbay MA (2020) An efficient hybrid metaheuristic algorithm for cardinality constrained portfolio optimization. Swarm Evolutionary Comput. 54:100662.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kovacevic R, Pichler A (2015) Tree approximation for discrete time stochastic processes: A process distance approach. Ann. Oper. Res. 235(1):395–421.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krokhmal PA (2007) Higher moment coherent risk measures. Quant. Finance 7(4):373–387.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krokhmal P, Zabarankin M, Uryasev S (2011) Modeling and optimization of risk. Surveys Oper. Res. Management Sci. 16(2):49–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Latorre JM, Cerisola S, Ramos A (2007) Clustering algorithms for scenario tree generation: Application to natural hydro inflows. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181(3):1339–1353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li Z, Floudas CA (2014) Optimal scenario reduction framework based on distance of uncertainty distribution and output performance: I. Single reduction via mixed integer linear optimization. Comput. Chemical Engrg. 70:50–66.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li Z, Floudas CA (2016) Optimal scenario reduction framework based on distance of uncertainty distribution and output performance: II. Sequential reduction. Comput. Chemical Engrg. 84:599–610.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li Z, Li Z (2016) Linear programming-based scenario reduction using transportation distance. Comput. Chemical Engrg. 88:50–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu W, Yang L, Yu B (2021) KDE distributionally robust portfolio optimization with higher moment coherent risk. Ann. Oper. Res. 307(1):363–397.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Matmoura Y, Penev S (2013) Multistage optimization of option portfolio using higher order coherent risk measures. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 227(1):190–198.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pflug GC (2009) Version-independence and nested distributions in multistage stochastic optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 20(3):1406–1420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pflug GC, Pichler A (2012) A distance for multistage stochastic optimization models. SIAM J. Optim. 22(1):1–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pflug GC, Pichler A (2015) Dynamic generation of scenario trees. Comput. Optim. Appl. 62(3):641–668.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pineda S, Conejo A (2010) Scenario reduction for risk-averse electricity trading. IET Generation Transmission Distribution 4(6):694–705.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Post T, Potì V (2017) Portfolio analysis using stochastic dominance, relative entropy, and empirical likelihood. Management Sci. 63(1):153–165.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rahimian H, Bayraksan G, Homem-de Mello T (2019) Identifying effective scenarios in distributionally robust stochastic programs with total variation distance. Math. Programming 173(1):393–430.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2013) The fundamental risk quadrangle in risk management, optimization and statistical estimation. Surveys Oper. Res. Management Sci. 18(1):33–53.Google Scholar
  • Rockafellar RT, Wets RJB (1998) Variational Analysis (Springer, Berlin), 238–297.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rysz M, Vinel A, Krokhmal P, Pasiliao EL (2015) A scenario decomposition algorithm for stochastic programming problems with a class of downside risk measures. INFORMS J. Comput. 27(2):416–430.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sahinidis NV (2004) Optimization under uncertainty: State-of-the-art and opportunities. Comput. Chemical Engrg. 28(6):971–983.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saranya K, Prasanna PK (2014) Portfolio selection and optimization with higher moments: Evidence from the Indian stock market. Asia Pacific Financial Markets 21(2):133–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro A, Dentcheva D, Ruszczyński A (2014) Lectures on Stochastic Programming: Modeling and Theory, 2nd ed. (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Topaloglou N, Vladimirou H, Zenios SA (2020) Integrated dynamic models for hedging international portfolio risks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 285(1):48–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vinel A, Krokhmal PA (2017) Certainty equivalent measures of risk. Ann. Oper. Res. 249:75–95.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang Y, Liu Y, Kirschen DS (2017) Scenario reduction with submodular optimization. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 32(3):2479–2480.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Woerheide W, Persson D (1992) An index of portfolio diversification. Financial Services Rev. 2(2):73–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xu D, Chen Z, Yang L (2012) Scenario tree generation approaches using K-means and LP moment matching methods. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 236(17):4561–4579.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.