L0-Regularized Learning for High-Dimensional Additive Hazards Regression
Published Online:13 Jun 2022https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2022.1208
References
- (1980) A Model for Nonparametric Regression Analysis of Counting Processes (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1982) Cox’s regression model for counting processes: A large sample study. Ann. Statist. 10(4):1100–1120.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Risk bounds for model selection via penalization. Probab. Theory Related Fields 113(3):301–413.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Square-root Lasso: Pivotal recovery of sparse signals via conic programming. Biometrika 98(4):791–806.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Program evaluation and causal inference with high-dimensional data. Econometrica 85(1):233–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Best subset selection via a modern optimization lens. Ann. Statist. 44(2):813–852.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Simultaneous analysis of Lasso and Dantzig selector. Ann. Statist. 37(4):1705–1732.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1987) Statistical Methods in Cancer Research, 2: The Design and Analysis of Case-Control Studies (IARC, Lyon, France).Google Scholar
- (2011) Statistics for High-Dimensional Data: Methods, Theory and Applications (Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) The Dantzig selector: Statistical estimation when p is much larger than n. Ann. Statist. 35(6):2313–2351.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Panning for gold: ‘Model-X’ knockoffs for high dimensional controlled variable selection. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B. Statist. Methodology 80(3):551–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Asymptotically normal and efficient estimation of covariate-adjusted Gaussian graphical model. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 111(513):394–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Understanding the impact of individual users’ rating characteristics on the predictive accuracy of recommender systems. INFORMS J. Comput. 32(2):303–320.Abstract, Google Scholar
- (1972) Regression models and life-tables. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B. Statist. Methodology 34(2):187–220.Google Scholar
- (1980) Analysis of Survival Data (Chapman and Hall, London).Google Scholar
- (2004) Least angle regression (with discussions). Ann. Statist. 32(2):407–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Variable selection via nonconcave penalized likelihood and its oracle properties. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 96(456):1348–1360.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) A selective overview of variable selection in high dimensional feature space. Statist. Sinica 20(1):101–148.Google Scholar
- (2012) Variance estimation using refitted cross-validation in ultrahigh dimensional regression. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B. Statist. Methodology 74(1):37–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Sparse high dimensional models in economics. Annual Rev. Econom. 3(1):291–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Innovated scalable efficient estimation in ultra-large Gaussian graphical models. Ann. Statist. 44(5):2098–2126.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Tuning parameter selection in high dimensional penalized likelihood. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B. Statist. Methodology 75(3):531–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) A neural network model for survival data. Statist. Medicine 14(1):73–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Coordinate descent methods for the penalized semiparametric additive hazards model. J. Statist. Software 47(9):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1982) Evaluating the yield of medical tests. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. 247(18):2543–2546.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin).Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) A constructive approach to l0 penalized regression. J. Machine Learning Res. 19(10):1–37.Google Scholar
- (2008) Random survival forest. Ann. Appl. Statist. 2:841–860.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) High-dimensional variable selection for survival data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 105(489):205–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Credit risk models. Annual Rev. Financial Econom. 1(1):37–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) A primal dual active set with continuation algorithm for the l0-regularized optimization problem. Appl. Comput. Harmonic Anal. 39(3):400–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) DeepSurv: Personalized treatment recommender system using a Cox proportional hazards deep neural network. BMC Medical Res. Methodology 18(1):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) On Cox processes and credit risky securities. Rev. Derivatives Res. 2(2–3):99–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) DeepHit: A deep learning approach to survival analysis with competing risks. Proc. 32th AAAI Conf. Artificial Intelligence 32(1):2314–2321.Google Scholar
- (2007) Path consistent model selection in additive risk model via Lasso. Statist. Medicine 26(20):3753–3770.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) High-dimensional sparse additive hazards regression. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 108(501):247–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Semiparametric analysis of the additive risk model. Biometrika 81(1):61–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Faster kriging: Facing high-dimensional simulators. Oper. Res. 68(1):233–249.Link, Google Scholar
- (2015) Extended Bayesian information criterion in the Cox model with a high-dimensional feature space. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 67(2):287–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) A unified approach to model selection and sparse recovery using regularized least squares. Ann. Statist. 37(6A):3498–3528.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Covariate selection for the semiparametric additive risk model. Scandinavian J. Statist. 36(4):602–619.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) A partly parametric additive risk model. Biometrika 81(3):501–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Efficient large-scale internet media selection optimization for online display advertising. J. Marketing Res. 55(4):489–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Variable inclusion and shrinkage algorithms. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 103(483):1304–1315.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) Regularization paths for Cox’s proportional hazards model via coordinate descent. J. Statist. Software 39(05):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 100(14):8418–8423.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Scaled sparse linear regression. Biometrika 99(4):879–898.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Penalized high-dimensional empirical likelihood. Biometrika 97(4):905–920.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B. Statist. Methodology 58(1):267–288.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2011) On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data. Statist. Medicine 30(10):1105–1117.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 415:530–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) BoXHED: Boosted eXact Hazard Estimator with Dynamic covariates. Proc. Machine Learning Res. 119:9973–9982.Google Scholar
- (2020) Convex optimization for group feature selection in networked data. INFORMS J. Comput. 32(1):182–198.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Statistical optimization in high dimensions. Oper. Res. 64(4):958–979.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) Variable screening for survival data in the presence of heterogeneous censoring. Scandinavian J. Statist. 47(4):1171–1191.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) High-dimensional macroeconomic forecasting and variable selection via penalized regression. Econom. J. 22(1):34–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Nearly unbiased variable selection under minimax concave penalty. Ann. Statist. 38(2):894–942.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Oracle inequalities and selection consistency for weighted Lasso in high-dimensional additive hazards model. Statist. Sinica 27(4):1903–1920.Google Scholar
- (2006) On model selection consistency of Lasso. J. Machine Learning Res. 7(12):2541–2563.Google Scholar
- (2014) High dimensional thresholded regression and shrinkage effect. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B. Statist. Methodology 76(3):627–649.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Nonsparse learning with latent variables. Oper. Res. 69(1):346–359.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) A polynomial algorithm for best-subset selection problem. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 117(52):33117–33123.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B. Statist. Methodology 67(2):301–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) One-step sparse estimates in nonconcave penalized likelihood models. Ann. Statist. 36(4):1509–1533.Google Scholar

