A Penalty Branch-and-Bound Method for Mixed Binary Linear Complementarity Problems

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2022.1216

References

  • Achterberg T, Koch T, Martin A (2005) Branching rules revisited. Oper. Res. Lett. 33(1):42–54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beck A (2017) First-Order Methods in Optimization, vol. 25 (SIAM).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benichou M, Gauthier JM, Girodet P, Hentges G, Ribiere G, Vincent O (1971) Experiments in mixed-integer linear programming. Math. Programming 1(1):76–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chandrasekaran R, Kabadi SN, Sridhar R (1998) Integer solution for linear complementarity problem. Math. Oper. Res. 23(2):390–402.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cottle RW, Pang JS, Stone RE (2009) The Linear Complementarity Problem (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cunningham WH, Geelen JF (1998) Integral solutions of linear complementarity problems. Math. Oper. Res. 23(1):61–68.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • De Santis M, Lucidi S, Rinaldi F (2013) A new class of functions for measuring solution integrality in the feasibility pump approach. SIAM J. Optim. 23(3):1575–1606.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dolan ED, Moré JJ (2002) Benchmarking optimization software with performance profiles. Math. Programming 91(2):201–213.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dubey D, Neogy SK (2018) Total dual integrality and integral solutions of the linear complementarity problem. Linear Algebra Appl. 557:359–374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fomeni FD, Gabriel SA, Anjos MF (2019a) Applications of logic constrained equilibria to traffic networks and to power systems with storage. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 70(2):310–325.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fomeni FD, Gabriel SA, Anjos MF (2019b) An RLT approach for solving the binary-constrained mixed linear complementarity problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 110:48–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabriel SA (1998) A hybrid smoothing method for mixed nonlinear complementarity problems. Comput. Optim. Appl. 9(2):153–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabriel SA (2017) Solving discretely constrained mixed complementarity problems using a median function. Optim. Engrg. 18(3):631–658.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabriel SA, Moré JJ (1997) Smoothing of mixed complementarity problems. Complementarity and Variational Problems: State of the Art, 105–116.Google Scholar
  • Gabriel SA, Leal M, Schmidt M (2021) Solving binary-constrained mixed complementarity problems using continuous reformulations. Comput. Oper. Res. 131:105208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabriel SA, Conejo AJ, Ruiz C, Siddiqui S (2013a) Solving discretely constrained, mixed linear complementarity problems with applications in energy. Comput. Oper. Res. 40(5):1339–1350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabriel SA, Siddiqui SA, Conejo AJ, Ruiz C (2013b) Solving discretely-constrained Nash–Cournot games with an application to power markets. Networks Spatial Econom. 13(3):307–326.Google Scholar
  • Gabriel SA, Conejo AJ, Fuller JD, Hobbs BF, Ruiz C (2012) Complementarity Modeling in Energy Markets, vol. 180 (Springer Science & Business Media).Google Scholar
  • Giannessi F, Tardella F (1998) Connections between nonlinear programming and discrete optimization. Handbook of Combinatorial Optimization (Springer), 149–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lucidi S, Rinaldi F (2010) Exact penalty functions for nonlinear integer programming problems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 145(3):479–488.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pardalos PM (1988) Linear complementarity problems solvable by integer programming. Optim. 19(4):467–474.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pardalos PM (1994) The Linear Complementarity Problem, vol. 275 (Springer, Netherlands), 39–49.Google Scholar
  • Pardalos PM (1996) Continuous Approaches to Discrete Optimization Problems (Springer US), 313–325.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pardalos PM, Nagurney A (1990) The integer linear complementarity problem. Internat. J. Comput. Math. 31(3–4):205–214.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pardalos PM, Rosen J (1988) Global optimization approach to the linear complementarity problem. SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput. 9(2):341–353.Google Scholar
  • Rinaldi F (2009) New results on the equivalence between zero-one programming and continuous concave programming. Optim. Lett. 3(3):377–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sumita H, Kakimura N, Makino K (2018) Total dual integrality of the linear complementarity problem. Ann. Oper. Res. 274(1–2):531–553.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Val PD (1940) The unloading problem for plane curves. Amer. J. Math. 62(1):307–311.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weinhold R, Gabriel SA (2020) Discretely constrained mixed complementary problems: Application and analysis of a stylised electricity market. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 71(2):237–249.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu WX (2003) Penalty parameter for linearly constrained 0–1 quadratic programming. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 116(1):229–239.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.