Bifidelity Surrogate Modelling: Showcasing the Need for New Test Instances

References

• Aleman DM, Romeijn HE, Dempsey JF (2009) A response surface approach to beam orientation optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning. INFORMS J. Comput. 21(1):62–76.Link, Google Scholar
• Andrés-Thió N (2022) Bifidelity surrogate modelling. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6208147, available for download at https://github.com/nandresthio/Bifidelity-Surrogate-Modelling.Google Scholar
• Andrés-Thió N, Muñoz M, Smith-Miles K (2021) Bi-fidelity surrogate modelling: Showcasing the need for new test instances. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6578060, available for download at https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2021.0299.Google Scholar
• Andrés-Thió N, Muñoz MA, Smith-Miles K (2022) Data folder. http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19196594.v1, available for download at https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_folder/19196594/1.Google Scholar
• Dong H, Song B, Wang P, Huang S (2015) Multi-fidelity information fusion based on prediction of Kriging. Structural Multidisciplinary Optim. 51(6):1267–1280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duchon J (1977) Splines minimizing rotation-invariant semi-norms in Sobolev spaces. Constructive Theory of Functions of Several Variables (Springer, Berlin), 8–100.Google Scholar
• Durantin C, Rouxel J, Désidéri JA, Glière A (2017) Multifidelity surrogate modeling based on radial basis functions. Structural Multidisciplinary Optim. 56(5):1061–1075.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernández-Godino MG, Park C, Kim NH, Haftka RT (2019) Issues in deciding whether to use multifidelity surrogates. AIAA J. 57(5):2039–2054.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forrester AI (2010) Black-box calibration for complex-system simulation. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A Math. Physical Engrg. Sci. 368(1924):3567–3579.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forrester AI, Sóbester A, Keane AJ (2007) Multi-fidelity optimization via surrogate modelling. Proc. Roy. Soc. A Math. Physical Engrg. Sci. 463(2088):3251–3269.Google Scholar
• Gutmann HM (2001) A radial basis function method for global optimization. J. Global Optim. 19(3):201–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen N, Auger A, Ros R, Mersmann O, Tušar T, Brockhoff D (2021) COCO: A platform for comparing continuous optimizers in a black-box setting. Optim. Methods Software 36(1):114–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones DR (2001) A taxonomy of global optimization methods based on response surfaces. J. Global Optim. 21(4):345–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kennedy MC, O’Hagan A (2000) Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available. Biometrika 87(1):1–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krige DG (1951) A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the witwatersrand. J. Southern Africa Inst. Mining Metallurgy 52(6):119–139.Google Scholar
• Liu B, Koziel S, Zhang Q (2016) A multi-fidelity surrogate-model-assisted evolutionary algorithm for computationally expensive optimization problems. J. Comput. Sci. 12:28–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu H, Ong YS, Cai J (2018a) A survey of adaptive sampling for global metamodeling in support of simulation-based complex engineering design. Structural Multidisciplinary Optim. 57(1):393–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Chen S, Wang F, Xiong F (2018b) Sequential optimization using multi-level coKriging and extended expected improvement criterion. Structural Multidisciplinary Optim. 58(3):1155–1173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu H, Ong YS, Cai J, Wang Y (2018c) Cope with diverse data structures in multi-fidelity modeling: A Gaussian process method. Engrg. Appl. Artificial Intelligence 67:211–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lv L, Zong C, Zhang C, Song X, Sun W (2021) Multi-fidelity surrogate model based on canonical correlation analysis and least squares. J. Mech. Design 143(2):021705.Crossref, Google Scholar
• March A, Willcox K (2012) Provably convergent multifidelity optimization algorithm not requiring high-fidelity derivatives. AIAA J. 50(5):1079–1089.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matheron G (1963) Principles of geostatistics. Econom. Geology 58(8):1246–1266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Müller J (2020) An algorithmic framework for the optimization of computationally expensive bi-fidelity black-box problems. INFOR Inform. Systems Oper. Res. 58(2):264–289.Google Scholar
• Müller J, Shoemaker CA (2014) Influence of ensemble surrogate models and sampling strategy on the solution quality of algorithms for computationally expensive black-box global optimization problems. J. Global Optim. 60(2):123–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muñoz MA, Smith-Miles KA (2017) Performance analysis of continuous black-box optimization algorithms via footprints in instance space. Evolutionary Comput. 25(4):529–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park C, Haftka RT, Kim NH (2017) Remarks on multi-fidelity surrogates. Structural Multidisciplinary Optim. 55(3):1029–1050.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park C, Haftka RT, Kim NH (2018) Low-fidelity scale factor improves Bayesian multi-fidelity prediction by reducing bumpiness of discrepancy function. Structural Multidisciplinary Optim. 58(2):399–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajnarayan D, Haas A, Kroo I (2008) A multifidelity gradient-free optimization method and application to aerodynamic design. Proc. 12th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Anal. Optim. Conf., 6020.Google Scholar
• Regis RG, Shoemaker CA (2007) A stochastic radial basis function method for the global optimization of expensive functions. INFORMS J. Comput. 19(4):497–509.Link, Google Scholar
• Ruan X, Jiang P, Zhou Q, Hu J, Shu L (2020) Variable-fidelity probability of improvement method for efficient global optimization of expensive black-box problems. Structural Multidisciplinary Optim. 62(6):3021–3052.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shahpar S, Brooks C, Forrester A, Keane A (2011) Multi-fidelity design optimisation of a transonic compressor rotor. 9th Eur. Conf. Turbomachinery Fluid Dynamics Thermodynamics, Istanbul, Turkey, vol. 2.Google Scholar
• Shi M, Lv L, Sun W, Song X (2020) A multi-fidelity surrogate model based on support vector regression. Structural Multidisciplinary Optim. 61:2363–2375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song X, Lv L, Sun W, Zhang J (2019) A radial basis function-based multi-fidelity surrogate model: Exploring correlation between high-fidelity and low-fidelity models. Structural Multidisciplinary Optim. 60(3):965–981.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Surjanovic S, Bingham D (2020) Virtual library of simulation experiments: Test functions and datasets. Retrieved December 14, 2020, from http://www.sfu.ca/~ssurjano.Google Scholar
• Toal DJ (2015) Some considerations regarding the use of multi-fidelity Kriging in the construction of surrogate models. Structural Multidisciplinary Optim. 51(6):1223–1245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Rijn S, Schmitt S, van Leeuwen M, Bäck T (2022) Finding efficient trade-offs in multi-fidelity response surface modeling. Engrg. Optim. 1–18.Google Scholar
• Wang H, Jin Y, Doherty J (2017) A generic test suite for evolutionary multifidelity optimization. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Comput. 22(6):836–850.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilcoxon F (1992) Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Breakthroughs in Statistics (Springer, New York), 196–202.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wild SM, Regis RG, Shoemaker CA (2008) ORBIT: Optimization by radial basis function interpolation in trust-regions. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 30(6):3197–3219.Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Hu J, Zhou Q, Wang S, Jin P (2020) An active learning multi-fidelity metamodeling method based on the bootstrap estimator. Aerospace Sci. Tech. 106:106116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiong S, Qian PZ, Wu CJ (2013) Sequential design and analysis of high-accuracy and low-accuracy computer codes. Technometrics 55(1):37–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao H, Gao Z, Xu F, Xia L (2021) Adaptive multi-fidelity sparse polynomial chaos-Kriging metamodeling for global approximation of aerodynamic data. Structural Multidisciplinary Optim. 64:829–858.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou Q, Wu Y, Guo Z, Hu J, Jin P (2020) A generalized hierarchical Co-Kriging model for multi-fidelity data fusion. Structural Multidisciplinary Optim. 62:1885–1904.Crossref, Google Scholar