Convergence Analysis of Stochastic Kriging-Assisted Simulation with Random Covariates

References

• Ahmed MA, Alkhamis TM (2009) Simulation optimization for an emergency department healthcare unit in Kuwait. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 198:936–942.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ankenman BE, Nelson BL, Staum J (2010) Stochastic kriging for simulation metamodeling. Oper. Res. 58(2):371–382.Link, Google Scholar
• Benini L, Hodgson R, Siegel P (1998) System-level power estimation and optimization. Chandrakasan A, Kiaei S, eds. Proc. Internat. Sympos. on Low Power Electronics and Design (ACM Press, New York), 173–178.Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Kallus N, Weinstein AM, Zhuo YD (2017) Personalized diabetes management using electronic medical records. Diabetes Care 40(2):210–217.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen CH, Lee LH (2011) Stochastic Simulation Optimization: An Optimal Computing Budget Allocation (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore).Google Scholar
• Chen X, Ankenman BE, Nelson BL (2013) Enhancing stochastic kriging metamodels with gradient estimators. Oper. Res. 61(2):512–528.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen CH, He D, Fu M, Lee LH (2008) Efficient simulation budget allocation for selecting an optimal subset. INFORMS J. Comput. 20(4):579–595.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen CH, Lin J, Yücesan E, Chick SE (2000) Simulation budget allocation for further enhancing the efficiency of ordinal optimization. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems 10:251–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dai L (1996) Convergence properties of ordinal comparison in the simulation of discrete event dynamic systems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 91(2):363–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ding H, Benyoucef L, Xie X (2005) A simulation optimization methodology for supplier selection problem. Internat. J. Comput. Integrated Manufacturing 18:210–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frazier PI, Powell WB, Dayanik S (2008) A knowledge-gradient policy for sequential information collection. SIAM J. Control Optim. 47(5):2410–2439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao S, Chen W (2017) Efficient feasibility determination with multiple performance measure constraints. IEEE Trans. Automated Control 62:113–122.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao S, Chen W, Shi L (2017) A new budget allocation framework for the expected opportunity cost. Oper. Res. 65:787–803.Link, Google Scholar
• Gao S, Du J, Chen CH (2019a) Selecting the optimal system design under covariates. Cappelleri D, Dimarogonas D, Dotoli M, Fanti MP, Lutz P, Seatzu C, Xie X, eds. Proc. IEEE 15th Internat. Conf. on Automation Sci. and Engrg. (IEEE, New York), 547–552.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gao S, Li C, Du J (2019b) Rate analysis for offline simulation online application. Mustafee N, Bae K-HG, Lazarova-Molnar S, Rabe M, Szabo C, Haas P, Son Y-J, eds. Proc. Winter Simulation Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 3468–3479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud SS, Karimi IA, Kraft M (2017) Design of computer experiments: A review. Comput. Chemical Engrg. 106:71–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glynn P, Juneja S (2004) A large deviations perspective on ordinal optimization. Ingalls RG, Rossetti MD, Smith JS, Peters BA, eds. Proc. Winter Simulation Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 577–585.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gu C (2002) Smoothing Spline ANOVA Models (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hensman J, Fusi N, Lawrence N (2014) Gaussian processes for big data. Proc. 29th Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (AUAI Press, Corvallis, OR), 282–290.Google Scholar
• Hong LJ, Jiang G (2019) Offline simulation online application: A new framework of simulation-based decision making. Asia-Pacific J. Oper. Res. 36(6):1940015.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsing T, Eubank R (2015) Theoretical Foundations of Functional Data Analysis, with an Introduction to Linear Operators (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Nelson BL (2006) Selecting the best system. Henderson SG, Nelson BL, eds. Simulation. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 501–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleijnen JPC (1993) Simulation and optimization in production planning: A case study. Decision Support Systems 9(3):269–280.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleijnen JPC (2009) Kriging metamodeling in simulation: A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 192(3):707–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Law AM (2015) Simulation Modeling and Analysis, 5th ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York.)Google Scholar
• Li C, Gao S, Du J (2022) Version v2021.0329. https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2021.0329.Google Scholar
• Luo Y, Duraiswami R (2013) Fast near-GRID Gaussian process regression. Carvalho CM, Ravikumar P, eds. Proc. 16th Internat. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence and Statist. (PMLR, Cambridge, MA), 424–432.Google Scholar
• Ni EC, Ciocan DF, Henderson SG, Hunter SR (2017) Efficient ranking and selection in parallel computing environments. Oper. Res. 65(3):821–836.Link, Google Scholar
• Qu H, Fu MC (2014) Gradient extrapolated stochastic kriging. ACM Trans. Modeling Comput. Simulations 24(4):3.Google Scholar
• Rasmussen CE, Williams CK (2006) Gaussian Process for Machine Learning (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Ryzhov IO (2016) On the convergence rates of expected improvement methods. Oper. Res. 64(6):1515–1528.Link, Google Scholar
• Sabuncuoglu I, Touhami S (2002) Simulation metamodeling with neural networks: An experimental investigation. Internat. J. Production Res. 40:2483–2505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santin G, Schaback R (2016) Approximation of eigenfunctions in kernel-based spaces. Adv. Comput. Math. 42(4):973–993.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shen H, Hong LJ, Zhang X (2021) Ranking and selection with covariates for personalized decision making. INFORMS J. Comput. 33(4):1500–1519.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Stein ML (1999) Interpolation for Spatial Data: Some Theory for Kriging (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steinwart I, Hush D, Scovel C (2009) Optimal rates for regularized least squares regression. Dasgupta S, Klivans A, eds. Proc. 22nd Annual Conf. on Learn. Theory, 79–93.Google Scholar
• van der Vaart AW, van Zanten JH (2011) Information rates of nonparametric Gaussian process methods. J. Machine Learn. Res. 12:2095–2119.Google Scholar
• Van Trees HL (2001) Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Wang B, Hu J (2018) Some monotonicity results for stochastic kriging metamodels in sequential settings. INFORMS J. Comput. 30(2):278–294.Link, Google Scholar
• Wilson A, Nickisch H (2015) Kernel interpolation for scalable structured Gaussian processes (KISS-GP). Bach F, Blei D, eds. Proc. Internat. Conf. on Machine Learn. (PMLR, Cambridge, MA), 1775–1784.Google Scholar
• Zhang T (2005) Learning bounds for kernel regression using effective data dimensionality. Neural Comput. 17:2077–2098.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou E, Xie W (2015) Simulation optimization when facing input uncertainty. Yilmaz L, Chan WKV, Moon I, Roeder TMK, Macal C, Rossetti MD, eds. Proc. Winter Simulation Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 3714–3724.Google Scholar