Now You See It, Now You Don’t: Obfuscation of Online Third-Party Information Sharing

References

• Acar G, Englehardt S, Narayanan A (2020) No boundaries: Data exfiltration by third parties embedded on web pages. Proc. Privacy Enhancing Tech. 2020(4):220–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof G (1970) The market for lemons: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. 84(3):488–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA, Shiller RJ (2015) Phishing for Phools: The Economics of Manipulation and Deception (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA, Shiller RJ (2016) Manipulation and deception as part of a phishing equilibrium. Bus. Econom. 51(4):207–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1985) The economics of agency. Pratt JW, Zeckhauser RJ, eds. Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business (Harvard Business School Press, Boston), 37–51.Google Scholar
• Bai X, Gopal R, Nunez M, Zhdanov D (2012) On the prevention of fraud and privacy exposure in process information flow. INFORMS J. Comput. 24(3):416–432.Link, Google Scholar
• Bushee BJ, Gow ID, Taylor DJ (2018) Linguistic complexity in firm disclosures: Obfuscation or information? J. Accounting Res. 56(1):85–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chellappa RK, Shivendu S (2007) An economic model of privacy: A property rights approach to regulatory choices for online personalization. J. Management Inform. Systems 24(3):193–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cisco (2021) Cisco 2021 consumer privacy survey. Accessed November 20, 2021, https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/about/doing_business/trust-center/docs/cisco-cybersecurity-series-2021-cps.pdf.Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM (1989) Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. 14(1):57–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G, Wolitzky A (2012) A search cost model of obfuscation. RAND J. Econom. 43(3):417–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Englehardt S, Narayanan A (2016) Online tracking: A 1-million-site measurement and analysis. Proc. ACM SIGSAC Conf. on Comput. and Comm. Security (ACM, New York), 1388–1401.Google Scholar
• Englehardt S, Reisman D, Eubank C, Zimmerman P, Mayer J, Narayanan A, Felten EW (2015) Cookies that give you away: The surveillance implications of web tracking. Proc. 24th Internat. Conf. on World Wide Web (ACM, New York), 289–299.Google Scholar
• Goldstein A, Eaton C (2021) Asymmetry by design? Identity obfuscation, reputational pressure, and consumer predation in U.S. for-profit higher education. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 86(5):896–933.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gopal RD, Hidaji H, Patterson RA, Rolland E, Zhdanov D (2018) How much to share with third parties? User privacy concerns and website dilemmas. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 42(1):143–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gu Y, Wenzel T (2014) Strategic obfuscation and consumer protection policy. J. Industry Econom. 62(4):632–660.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta R, Bagchi A, Sarkar S (2007) Improving linkage of web pages. INFORMS J. Comput. 19(1):127–136.Link, Google Scholar
• Harsanyi JC (1968) Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players. Part ii. Bayesian equilibrium points. Management Sci. 14(5):320–334.Link, Google Scholar
• Hölmstrom B (1979) Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. 10(1):74–91.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jenson MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. 3(4):305–360.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khatibloo F, Liu S, Pilecki M, Flug M, Hartig K (2018) Right Your Privacy Ship Before It Capsizes (Forrester).Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy B, Naryshkin K, Wills C (2011) Privacy leakage vs. protection measures: The growing disconnect. Proc. Web, vol. 2 (ACM, New York, NY), 1–10.Google Scholar
• Li Y (2012) Theories in online information privacy research: A critical review and an integrated framework. Decision Support Systems 54(1):471–481.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Libert T (2015) Exposing the hidden web: An analysis of third-party http requests on 1 million websites. Preprint, submitted November 2, https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.00619.Google Scholar
• Mare RD (1980) Social background and school continuation decisions. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 75(370):295–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA (2011) State of the information privacy literature: Where are we now and where should we go? Management Inform. Systems Quart. 35(4):977–988.Crossref, Google Scholar
• PewResearch (2019) Americans and privacy: Concerned, confused and feeling lack of control over their personal information. Accessed November 24, 2021, https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/11/15/americans-attitudes.Google Scholar
• Quintin C (2015) Healthcare.gov Sends Personal Data to Dozens of Tracking Websites (Electronic Frontier Foundation).Google Scholar
• Roesner F, Kohno T, Wetherall D (2012) Detecting and defending against third-party tracking on the web. Proc. 9th USENIX Sympos. on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (USENIX, Berkeley, CA), 155–168.Google Scholar
• Salesforce (2019) State of the connected customer. Accessed November 20, 2021, https://www.salesforce.com/news/stories/state-of-the-connected-customer.Google Scholar
• Smith HJ, Dinev T, Xu H (2011) Information privacy research: An interdisciplinary review. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 35(4):989–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• TechTimes (2020) Safe browsing made easy: Benefits of using web of trust. Accessed November 24, 2021, https://www.techtimes.com/articles/248191/20200319/safe-browsing-made-easy-benefits-of-using-web-of-trust.Google Scholar
• Vincent J (2021) California bans ‘dark patterns’ that trick users into giving away their personal data. Accessed November 24, 2021, https://www.theverge.com/2021/3/16/22333506.Google Scholar
• Wilson CM (2010) Ordered search and equilibrium obfuscation. Internat. J. Industrial Organ. 28(5):496–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Liu H, Cai Y (2013) Discovery of online shopping patterns across websites. INFORMS J. Comput. 25(1):161–176.Link, Google Scholar
• Yu Z, Macbeth S, Modi K, Pujol JM (2016) Tracking the trackers. Proc. 25th Internat. Conf. on World Wide Web (ACM, New York), 121–132.Google Scholar