Efficient Project Scheduling with Autonomous Learning Opportunities

References

• Ahuja RK, Magnanti TL, Orlin JB (1988) Network Flows (Pearson, London).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Artigues C (2017) On the strength of time-indexed formulations for the resource-constrained project scheduling problem. Oper. Res. Lett. 45(2):154–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babu A, Suresh N (1996) Project management with time, cost, and quality considerations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 88(2):320–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bai D, Tang M, Zhang ZH, Santibanez-Gonzalez ED (2018) Flow shop learning effect scheduling problem with release dates. Omega 78:21–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biskup D (2008) A state-of-the-art review on scheduling with learning effects. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 188(2):315–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao H, Hall NG, Wan G, Zhao W (2024) Optimal intraproject learning. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 26(2):681–700.Link, Google Scholar
• De Reyck B, Herroelen W (1999) The multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem with generalized precedence relations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 119(2):538–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dodin B, Elimam A (1997) Audit scheduling with overlapping activities and sequence-dependent setup costs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 97(1):22–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus H (1885) Über das Gedächtnis. Untersuchungen zur experimentellen Psychologie (Duncker & Humblot, Leipzig, Germany).Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby SE, Kamburowski J (1992) The analysis of activity networks under generalized precedence relations (GPRs). Management Sci. 38(9):1245–1263.Link, Google Scholar
• Glock CH, Grosse EH, Jaber MY, Smunt TL (2019) Applications of learning curves in production and operations management: A systematic literature review. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 131:422–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall NG (2012) Project management: Recent developments and research opportunities. J. Systems Sci. Systems Engrg. 21(2):129–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartmann S, Briskorn D (2010) A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartmann S, Briskorn D (2022) An updated survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 297(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heuser P, Letmathe P, Vossen TW (2024) Skill development in the field of scheduling: A structured literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Hill A, Ticktin J, Vossen TWM (2021) A computational study of constraint programming approaches for resource-constrained project scheduling with autonomous learning effects. Stuckey PJ, ed. Integration of Constraint Programming Artificial Intelligence Oper. Res. 18th Internat. Conf. CPAIOR 2021 Proc., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 12735 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 26–44.Google Scholar
• Hochbaum DS (2016) A polynomial time repeated cuts algorithm for the time cost tradeoff problem: The linear and convex crashing cost deadline problem. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 95:64–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson TJR (1967) An algorithm for the resource constrained project scheduling problem. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Kelley JE Jr (1961) Critical-path planning and scheduling: Mathematical basis. Oper. Res. 9(3):296–320.Link, Google Scholar
• Kolisch R, Sprecher A (1997) PSPLIB—A project scheduling problem library: OR software—ORSEP operations research software exchange program. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 96(1):205–216.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Korytkowski P, Malachowski B (2019) Competence-based estimation of activity duration in IT projects. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 275(2):708–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laborie P, Rogerie J, Shaw P, Vilím P (2018) IBM ILOG CP Optimizer for scheduling. Constraints 23(2):210–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee WC, Wu CC, Hsu PH (2010) A single-machine learning effect scheduling problem with release times. Omega 38(1–2):3–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Möhring RH, Skutella M, Stork F (2004) Scheduling with and/or precedence constraints. SIAM J. Comput. 33(2):393–415.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Möhring RH, Schulz AS, Stork F, Uetz M (1999) Resource-constrained project scheduling: Computing lower bounds by solving minimum cut problems. Eur. Sympos. Algorithms ESA ‘99, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1643 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 139–150.Google Scholar
• Pritsker AAB, Waiters LJ, Wolfe PM (1969) Multiproject scheduling with limited resources: A zero-one programming approach. Management Sci. 16(1):93–108.Link, Google Scholar
• Qian J, Steiner G (2013) Fast algorithms for scheduling with learning effects and time-dependent processing times on a single machine. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 225(3):547–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reyck BD, Demeulemeester E, Herroelen W (1999) Algorithms for scheduling projects with generalized precedence relations. Węglarz J, ed. Project Scheduling, International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 14 (Springer, Boston), 77–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwindt C, Zimmermann J, eds. (2015) Handbook on Project Management and Scheduling (Springer, Cham, Switzerland).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Peteghem V, Vanhoucke M (2015) Influence of learning in resource-constrained project scheduling. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 87:569–579.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vanhoucke M (2008) Setup times and fast tracking in resource-constrained project scheduling. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 54(4):1062–1070.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vanhoucke M, Debels D (2008) The impact of various activity assumptions on the lead time and resource utilization of resource-constrained projects. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 54(1):140–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright TP (1936) Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. J. Aeronaut. Sci. 3(4):122–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yelle LE (1979) The learning curve: Historical review and comprehensive survey. Decision Sci. 10(2):302–328.Crossref, Google Scholar