Decision Making Under Cumulative Prospect Theory: An Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers

References

• Acerbi C (2002) Spectral measures of risk: A coherent representation of subjective risk aversion. J. Banking Finance 26(7):1505–1518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja RK, Orlin JB (2001) A fast scaling algorithm for minimizing separable convex functions subject to chain constraints. Oper. Res. 49(5):784–789.Link, Google Scholar
• Ayer M, Brunk HD, Ewing GM, Reid WT, Silverman E (1955) An empirical distribution function for sampling with incomplete information. Ann. Math. Statist. 26(4):641–647.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bai X, Sun J, Zheng X (2021) An augmented Lagrangian decomposition method for chance-constrained optimization problems. INFORMS J. Comput. 33(3):1056–1069.Link, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Huang M (2008) Stocks as lotteries: The implications of probability weighting for security prices. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(5):2066–2100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N, Xiong W (2009) What drives the disposition effect? An analysis of a long-standing preference-based explanation. J. Finance 64(2):751–784.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barlow RE, Bartholomew DJ, Bremner JM, Brunk H (1972) Statistical Inference Under Order Restrictions: The Theory and Application of Isotonic Regression, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics (John Wiley & Sons, London), 388.Google Scholar
• Barro D, Corazza M, Nardon M (2020) Cumulative prospect theory portfolio selection. Department of Economics Research Paper Series No. 26, University Ca’Foscari of Venice, Venice, Italy.Google Scholar
• Bazaraa MS, Sherali HD, Shetty CM (2006) Nonlinear Programming: Theory and Algorithms (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beck A (2017) First-Order Methods in Optimization (SIAM, Philadelphia).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernard C, Ghossoub M (2010) Static portfolio choice under cumulative prospect theory. Math. Financial Econom. 2(4):277–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Best MJ, Chakravarti N (1990) Active set algorithms for isotonic regression; a unifying framework. Math. Programming 47(1):425–439.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Best MJ, Chakravarti N, Ubhaya VA (2000) Minimizing separable convex functions subject to simple chain constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 10(3):658–672.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyd S, Xiao L, Mutapcic A (2003) Subgradient methods. Lecture notes of EE392o, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Boyd S, Parikh N, Chu E, Peleato B, Eckstein J (2011) Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers, Foundations and Trends Machine Learning, vol. 3 (now Publishers, Hanover, MA), 1–122.Google Scholar
• Clarke FH (1990) Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis (SIAM, Philadelphia).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Combettes PL, Pesquet JC (2007) A Douglas–Rachford splitting approach to nonsmooth convex variational signal recovery. IEEE J. Selected Topics Signal Processing 1(4):564–574.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui Z, Lee C, Zhu L, Zhu Y (2021) Non-convex isotonic regression via the Myersonian approach. Statist. Probab. Lett. 179:109210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui X, Jiang R, Shi Y, Xiao R, Yan Y (2024) Decision making under cumulative prospect theory: An alternating direction method of multipliers. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2023.0243.cd, https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2023.0243.Google Scholar
• Cui X, Sun X, Zhu S, Jiang R, Li D (2018) Portfolio optimization with nonparametric value at risk: A block coordinate descent method. INFORMS J. Comput. 30(3):454–471.Link, Google Scholar
• De Giorgi E, Legg S (2012) Dynamic portfolio choice and asset pricing with narrow framing and probability weighting. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 36(7):951–972.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhaene J, Vanduffel S, Goovaerts MJ, Kaas R, Tang Q, Vyncke D (2006) Risk measures and comonotonicity: A review. Stochastic Models 22(4):573–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duffie D, Pan J (1997) An overview of value at risk. J. Derivatives 4(3):7–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eeckhoudt L, Schlesinger H (2006) Putting risk in its proper place. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):280–289.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glowinski R, Marrocco A (1977) Numerical solution of two-dimensional magnetostatic problems by augmented Lagrangian methods. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 12(1):33–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gurobi Optimization (2023) Gurobi Optimizer Suite release 11.0.0. Accessed February 27, 2024, https://docs.gurobi.com/projects/optimizer/en/current/reference/misc/detailedreleasenotes.html.Google Scholar
• He XD, Zhou XY (2011) Portfolio choice under cumulative prospect theory: An analytical treatment. Management Sci. 57(2):315–331.Link, Google Scholar
• Hens T, Mayer J (2014) Cumulative prospect theory and mean variance analysis: A rigorous comparison. Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper No. 14-23, Swiss Finance Institute, Zurich.Google Scholar
• Jin H, Zhou XY (2008) Behavioral portfolio selection in continuous time. Math. Finance 18(3):385–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica 47:263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X, Wang W, Xu C, Li Z, Wang B (2015) Multi-objective optimization of urban bus network using cumulative prospect theory. J. Systems Sci. Complexity 28(3):661–678.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin Z, Li H, Fang C (2022) Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers for Machine Learning (Springer Nature, Singapore).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu W, Liu C, Ge M (2013) An order allocation model for the two-echelon logistics service supply chain based on cumulative prospect theory. J. Purchasing Supply Management 19(1):39–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luxenberg E, Schiele P, Boyd S (2024) Portfolio optimization with cumulative prospect theory utility via convex optimization. Comput. Econom., ePub ahead of print February 12, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-024-10556-x.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagarajan M, Shechter S (2014) Prospect theory and the newsvendor problem. Management Sci. 60(4):1057–1062.Link, Google Scholar
• Nocedal J, Wright SJ (1999) Numerical Optimization (Springer-Verlag, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parikh N, Boyd S (2014) Proximal Algorithms, Foundations and Trends in Optimization, vol. 1 (now Publishers, Hanover, MA), 127–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polkovnichenko V, Zhao F (2013) Probability weighting functions implied in options prices. J. Financial Econom. 107(3):580–609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pratt J (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32:122–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D (1998) The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66(3):497–527.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quiggin J, ed. (2012) Generalized Expected Utility Theory: The Rank-Dependent Model (Springer Science & Business Media, Dordrecht, Netherlands).Google Scholar
• Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2:21–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scheinberg K, Ma S, Goldfarb D (2010) Sparse inverse covariance selection via alternating linearization methods. Lafferty J, Williams C, Shawe-Taylor J, Zemel R, Culotta A, eds. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY), 23.Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Wen Z, Zhang Y (2014) Augmented Lagrangian alternating direction method for matrix separation based on low-rank factorization. Optim. Methods Software 29(2):239–263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Cui X, Li D (2015a) Discrete-time behavioral portfolio selection under cumulative prospect theory. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 61:283–302.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Cui X, Zhou XY (2023) Beta and coskewness pricing: Perspective from probability weighting. Oper. Res. 71(2):776–790.Link, Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Cui X, Yao J, Li D (2015b) Dynamic trading with reference point adaptation and loss aversion. Oper. Res. 63(4):789–806.Link, Google Scholar
• Strömberg U (1991) An algorithm for isotonic regression with arbitrary convex distance function. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 11(2):205–219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Fox CR (1995) Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psych. Rev. 102(2):269–283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 5(4):297–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Bilsen S, Laeven RJ (2020) Dynamic consumption and portfolio choice under prospect theory. Insurance Math. Econom. 91:224–237.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1947) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Yin W, Zeng J (2019) Global convergence of ADMM in nonconvex nonsmooth optimization. J. Sci. Comput. 78:29–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Yin W, Wen Z, Zhang Y (2012) An alternating direction algorithm for matrix completion with nonnegative factors. Frontiers Math. China 7(2):365–384.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yu Z, Chen X, Li X (2023) A dynamic programming approach for generalized nearly isotonic optimization. Math. Programming Comput. 15:195–225.Crossref, Google Scholar